lol Christopher Judge just indirectly confirmed that he's in a new GOW game that will be revealed this summer. This is probably that cory game. I guess GOW Egypt. But since he says you will be hearing what we are doing, its highly likely that he's in that game and its a GOW game.
There have been some theorycrafters saying that the reason the remakes are coming out is partially to retcon or change a thing or two for the egypt games, using clips from 2018 and Ragnarok.
I am still cautiously optimistic. the right people with the right engine and the right plan can make one hell of a graphics showcase [RAD's The Order 1886] and maybe even a great game
I feel like this isn't true at all. Most UE5 games which are using Lumen and target 60 are usually in the 720p to 1080p range.
So this is pretty fucking far from a "click of a button".
Don't be surprised those fuckers mangers and on top of them hirman hulst destroyed sony
looks far more original and exciting than the new Forza horizon game, and the past few NFS titles.
watch some of the Digital foundry videos of UE5 games. Pretty much all of them are in the 1440p range with DRS going from 1296-1512p. Wukong was the first game that was patched to run at 1080p after launch and they had to revert it back to 1440p because people were like this looks even worse. IIRC, they increased some of the shadows and level of detail settings which brought the DRS down to 1080p but then reverted back to the original settings to get back to a higher resolution. they ended up disabling lumen for the 60 fps version a year later.
obviously there is work required, but its not complex. devs have been baking in lighting data since forever. the UE5 editor lets you see the results with the press of a button. Im sure there is more work to be done after that, but its much better than releasing a game that runs at 720p and looks like shit.
this is bigger than sony. A couple of days ago, a few tweets went viral about devs with lots of Rockstar, ND, Ubisoft. Rocksteady and other AAA experience not being able to find work after a year of searching.
To this point I was just naively baffled about Sony's general incompetence this gen.
There goes my hope for the remake. let alone a new game
Looks great. I kind of feel like these games should be episodic adventures you release every few months though. I wouldn't pay more than 10-20 for these type of games if Little Nightmares is anything to go by.Just another quick reminder, if you haven't played REANIMAL, please do
You'll be doing your eyes and your mind a huge favour.
It's an extremely beautiful game
for our rock connoisseurs here:
profits over everything. the corporate takeover of this industry is now complete. they ruined hollywood then music and food, and now its gamings turn. baseball is set for a shutdown next year which may result in a 2-3 year strike. all because a bunch of private equity guys took over and started outbidding everyone else.
Just cancel it and get over with. Can't even remake a game. And not just this one. Pathetic studio.
Yups, looks like hydra is in same place where this witcher3 version exist:
They gotta have that Switch 2 version
IDK... the more I see Wolverine, the more I notice the PS4 rooted ahh graphical quality in many areas it's quite shocking especially after viewing it on my 65inch 4K TV.
Like...look at this shit!
1. Flat textures & models.
2. Great bike model, but the overall distant detail & lighting are pretty lacking.
3. Flat shadowing & blocky mountain cliffs, barely any better than Uncharted Lost Legacy.
4. Spider Man PS4 2018 rain cutscene where you get surrounded by all villains looks as good if not better.
5. Again, very lacking in detail & bad lighting/reflections. Early PS4 look.
6. Looks good here, but still why are object density & geometry not pushed enough?
7. This looks embarrassing tbh, literally PS3 stuff.
There are great looking moments but it looks soooo inconsistent (like Spider Man 2) so far, hopefully they iron out those weaknesses, can't be getting a Sony AAA game looking like this especially next to GTA 6.
I may have exaggerated it, but it really looks outdated in those moments.
Quote my reply, it's OK, I'll do better next time. That said though there's still more than enough here to differentiate a really great looking scene VS not so great looking scene, doncha' think?
it could look better, but dont go by youtube screenshots. especially of fast moving scenes.IDK... the more I see Wolverine, the more I notice the PS4 rooted ahh graphical quality in many areas it's quite shocking especially after viewing it on my 65inch 4K TV.
Like...look at this shit!
1. Flat textures & models.
2. Great bike model, but the overall distant detail & lighting are pretty lacking.
3. Flat shadowing & blocky mountain cliffs, barely any better than Uncharted Lost Legacy.
4. Spider Man PS4 2018 rain cutscene where you get surrounded by all villains looks as good if not better.
5. Again, very lacking in detail & bad lighting/reflections. Early PS4 look.
6. Looks good here, but still why are object density & geometry not pushed enough?
7. This looks embarrassing tbh, literally PS3 stuff (well not PS3 but you get my drift).
There are great looking moments but it looks soooo inconsistent (like Spider Man 2) so far, hopefully they iron out those weaknesses, can't be getting a Sony AAA game looking like this especially next to GTA 6.
I usually agree with you on most takes, but to just say bake your lighting as if it's just a quick stage is baffling. It's not that simple even for a static game, what about when they have dynamic time of day, weather, dynamic environments etc. Ubisoft did a whole presentation on how much more work it was for static lighting in AC Shadows and that's a massive studio. Smaller studios either need to start with baked lighting from the start and plan their design around it or go with dynamic lighting and accept the performance cost. To just say oh they can just bake it in quickly is crazy. Wukong only adding a lumen disabled option a whole year later is clear evidence of that.
The game is like 4 hours length max. Def worth on a sale for $10. Anything more is a rip-off.
The issue is that the increased revenue is not coming from people buying new AAA games to the same a degree as it is from MTX spending.
Thats what a lot of these guys have been doing, and it generally doesn't work out. Also no matter how "small" the games are, assembling a new credible team requires capital, and that means funding. Venture capitalists are not going to be pumping nearly as much investment as the growth prospects of the industry continue to flatten.
