its a fact ff9 was capped at 20fps in combat and when on world map, which even then looked and fellt terrible, i remember it to this day and back then i didnt know even what framerate was, i was teenager, game just fellt choppy/unresponsive af even tho it hat atb systemIt's already hard to pick games that have aged well, if you disqualify based on framerate we are fucking done
I played on my father leftovers pc since forever so i was used to games running at shit framerates.its a fact ff9 was capped at 20fps in combat and when on world map, which even then looked and fellt terrible, i remember it to this day and back then i didnt know even what framerate was, i was teenager, game just fellt choppy/unresponsive af even tho it hat atb system
Yeah. When you think that it was a Saturn game to begin with, then became multiplat, then was cancelled on Saturn. Really sad for us Saturn playersI thought Heart of Darkness looked amazing
Yeah. When you think that it was a Saturn game to begin with, then became multiplat, then was cancelled on Saturn. Really sad for us Saturn players
Well.. all thanks to Nintendo backward-ass hardware mentality that cuffs developers hands.
I have a particular fondness for Rage Racer too. Even though that Type 4 is indeniably for advanced in areas like texture smoothness, lighting, post processing effects and car models, Rage Racer remained unmatched in matter of sheer track detail and sense of speed. In 1996 it was actually quite jaw dropping, like a near magical sense of having a cutting edge acade racer right at home. Another graphically very impressive and somewhat underrated racer was Porche Challenge in my opinion. Exquisite really, albeit with some obvious popping and only a single car model (still, the best car rendering until Gran Turismo i think).
