Allnamestakenlol
Member
Be interesting to see how much vram it's going to eat up. Big environments, fairly detailed textures, etc. Unity made me hit the 4gb wall pretty fast.
GTA V PC Performance Thread
- Thread starter noomi
- Start date
I agree, just 8 more hours until we can get our facts on anyway.
That would be nice. I just need it to last one more year or less until I finally pull the trigger on a rebuild.
d00d3n
Member
But SLI compatibility bits are not out, right?
noomi
Member
I'm very interested in this as well, I think Rockstar mentioned at least 4GB for 4K resolutions.
They're out with the new driver.
Included in the Game Driver release in OP
d00d3n
Member
Makes sense for 4k and gives me hope that I can pull a lot of those sliders to the max @1080p with 4GB VRAM.
digitalrelic
Banned
i7 4790k OC'ed to 4.7ghz
GTX 980 OC'ed to 1350mhz core, 2000mhz mem
Samsung EVO 840 1TB
16 GB 1866mhz RAM
Fully expect to max this game out (minus crazy AA) @1080P with a locked 60FPS.
GTX 980 OC'ed to 1350mhz core, 2000mhz mem
Samsung EVO 840 1TB
16 GB 1866mhz RAM
Fully expect to max this game out (minus crazy AA) @1080P with a locked 60FPS.
d00d3n
Member
Thinking about putting this on my SSD but there isnt enough room for both this and BF4
I share your pain. It was excruciating to clean up my SSDs for this game. Mostly my own fault for not finishing games I buy, but it was not fun.
Mad Season
Banned
better performance
Backfoggen
Banned
Man I want to see benchmarks so bad. GameGPU, PCGH.de better be on their game.
I think I saw one screen where the person was using nearly 6GB, presumably at 4K.
Thinking about putting this on my SSD but there isnt enough room for both this and BF4
I only have a single 120gb ssd that had around 15gb available so finding space was rough. In the end I had to download a HDD space analyzer, and I found that I for some reason still had 8gb of Vram reserved and 8gb of hibernation space reserved. Turned my vram down to the minimum recommended and turned hibernation off and that was a solid 15gb right there. Might be worth looking into if you don't ever use hibernate and you have a lot of physical ram (8gb+).
Also, everyone should be looking into their multiple Nvidia folders on their PCs, because they store a ton of garbage. I had 3gb in each folder of old driver .exes that were literally doing nothing worthwhile, just rotting.
noomi
Member
Damn, well my monitor is limited to 1080p anyway, I'll be happy to run it at that resolution with ultra setting if I can stay under 4GB.
Doubt you will with MSAA, without it, sure I guess.
Buffer allocation doesn't necessarily mean buffered utilized or even needed though. It's why that measurement in Fraps or what have you isn't all that useful without tying it it to performance.
Dries
Member
I would hope so... I'm going for 1440p maxed with a i5 2500K 4.4Ghz and OC'ed 980 as well. I could settle for 30 fps though.
I have the same spec so I hope for the same results.
True, but other shots don't seem to indicate it's the type of game that just uses what's there.
We'll see. Anyways, 6GB at 4K using turned up settings isn't really so surprising anyways.
VisceralBowl
Member
3570k @ 4.2 GHz
GTA 780 3GB
16GB RAM
I hope it runs well.
GTA 780 3GB
16GB RAM
I hope it runs well.
thechristoph
Sir!
i7 2600k
GTA 750Ti 2mb
8gb RAM
24 inch 1080p monitor.
I don't think I can go crazy on the mesh quality and all of the post processing effects, but I think I'll be cool with textures and hopefully AA.
GTA 750Ti 2mb
8gb RAM
24 inch 1080p monitor.
I don't think I can go crazy on the mesh quality and all of the post processing effects, but I think I'll be cool with textures and hopefully AA.
IMACOMPUTA
Member
Scared/mad that my 780ti is only 3gb. Why Nvidia, why?
1440p here... :/
1440p here... :/
the_firewithin
Member
3770k (stock)
970 SSC
8GB ram
this shouldn't be a problem to get max at 1080 with 60fps right?
970 SSC
8GB ram
this shouldn't be a problem to get max at 1080 with 60fps right?
You're right! Have to try if it works in borderless window mode now.
Now if they only got DSR+SLI+G-Sync working...
CyanideFuse
Member
I have been downloading the game through the Social Club software and I noticed that whilst playing Lords of the Fallen my framerate was about 3-5fps down. When I closed the software (didn't try minimising) the framerate returned to normal. I guess it is to do with what you have mentioned.
Yep, whoever did the code for the downloader made it very inefficient!
Windom Earle
Member
Got the same setup albeit the RAM and my CPU runs at 4,4. We shall see.
So this time even the installer is CPU limited.
here4payne
Member
i5-3470 3.2 ghz
GTX 770 2GB
8 GB RAM
Meet the recommended requirements which isn't suprising considering this game was built for last gen consoles, but not expecting to run this completely maxed out. Hoping for 60 fps at 1080p.
GTX 770 2GB
8 GB RAM
Meet the recommended requirements which isn't suprising considering this game was built for last gen consoles, but not expecting to run this completely maxed out. Hoping for 60 fps at 1080p.
0.1.1.2.3.5.8.13.21.34.55
Banned
you can always downsample
GearDraxon
Member
Specs-brother! I'm hoping to do the same, perhaps with a tiny bit of DSR? Fingers crossed.
First attempt at installing 350.12 led to an initial failure of Windows 7 to boot (first time in 2 years I've seen a problem resulting from a driver update on this particular rig).
Subsequent reboot showed no issues.
Later reboot resulted in a failure to boot Windows 7 again.
Checked installation and no sign of PhysX installation.
Deleted driver and re-installed.
All good again and PhysX once again present.
Subsequent reboot showed no issues.
Later reboot resulted in a failure to boot Windows 7 again.
Checked installation and no sign of PhysX installation.
Deleted driver and re-installed.
All good again and PhysX once again present.
I did update through GeForce Experience and everything went fine.