John Wick
Member
Quantum Break takes the cake right know, ultra 1440p on a 980Ti stays on low 20´s fps.
Demanding? Not a game that is poorly coded and unoptimised.
Quantum Break takes the cake right know, ultra 1440p on a 980Ti stays on low 20´s fps.
But doesn't 100Hz+ require you to run games at 100+ FPS? Isn't that super difficult with modern games even with one of these new cards?
You don't have to run at 100fps all the time (or run max settings all the time :/ ). The frame rate of the game 99% of the time is independent of the refresh rate of your monitor (unless its a bad bad port). I play 60fps capped games like Dark Souls 1-3 at 120hz. Sometimes you have to use work arounds like borderless windowed to force your desktop refresh for games that don't support over 60hz in fullscreen (like Dark Souls 1-3 :/ ).
For best visual results, the monitor and the game should run (and be capped with something like RTSS) on the same timing ratio e.g. 24fps, 30fps, 60fps all divide evenly into 120fps; 25fps, 50fps divides into 100hz.
I know I'm waiting for at least the custom versions - if EVGA puts out a water-cooled one, like their current Hybrid.
GTX 980 is fine for me.
I'm 1080p G-synching @ 75hz until 2020.
That's the next piece of the puzzle: how much longer until the manufacturers get their own custom releases out?
I'd love to wait for the 1080 as I'm rocking a 770 right now but it really seems like an upgrade to the 390X is a far better choice thanks to the cheaper AUD price tag. The 390X is currently ~$480AUD while the 1080 will most likely launch at +$600AUD, and its still quite a substantial performance jump from the 770 4GB model I have.
I think I'll stick to what I've been doing in previous upgrade paths, change in-between gens. This will especially be the case if I get a 390X and then upgrade later in 2019 or 2020 with HBM2 gen 2 or gen 3 cards.
If the new 1080 is using GDDR5X vs HBM2 and they claim now it's roughly faster, but in reality can be 20% faster. Let's theoretically assume it is noticeably faster but not glaring, why is there a reluctance to buy it just because of the memory? What difference is that going to make if in the end it is still putting out better numbers. Are the people saying this the same ones that own a 980 or 980ti and for them the upgrade is not significant enough. Or, is it mostly people who own 970 and below and still feel it's not worth an upgrade? I've been needing an upgrade for a longtime and now and was specifically waiting for this new gen and
I feel reluctant after reading some comments.
Why anyone would be looking to upgrade in May when both Pascal and Polaris are likely to launch in the next 4-6 weeks?
Why anyone would be looking to upgrade in May when both Pascal and Polaris are likely to launch in the next 4-6 weeks?
cost? though I will wait for all the cost to be reveled.
I'm still hoping the Polaris with GTX 980 Ti performance at $300.
VRWhy anyone would be looking to upgrade in May when both Pascal and Polaris are likely to launch in the next 4-6 weeks?
You don't have to run at 100fps all the time (or run max settings all the time :/ ). The frame rate of the game 99% of the time is independent of the refresh rate of your monitor (unless its a bad bad port). I play 60fps capped games like Dark Souls 1-3 at 120hz. Sometimes you have to use work arounds like borderless windowed to force your desktop refresh for games that don't support over 60hz in fullscreen (like Dark Souls 1-3 :/ ).
For best visual results, the monitor and the game should run (and be capped with something like RTSS) on the same timing ratio e.g. 24fps, 48fps, and 72fps divides into 144hz; 24fps, 30fps, 60fps all divide evenly into 120fps; 25fps, 50fps divides into 100hz; 30fps and 45fps for 90hz.
this was good advice.This is how I see things...
1080p 60Hz
-Don't upgrade: 780 or above
-Upgrade: 770 or below.
- Get: 1070. Watch Maxwell price drops and used market
1080p 100Hz+
- Don't upgrade: 980, 980 Ti, Titan X
- Upgrade: 970 or below
- Get: 1070
1440p 60Hz
- Don't upgrade: 980 980 Ti, Titan X
- Upgrade: 970 or below
- Get 1070
1440p 100Hz+
-Don't upgrade: 980 Ti, Titan X
-Upgrade: Anything but a 980 Ti, Titan X
- Get 1080 if you are on old hardware, those with Maxwell wait for 1080 Ti w/HBM2
4K 60Hz
- Don't upgrade: SLI 980 Ti or SLI Titan X
- Upgrade: Everybody else
- Get: 1080 if on old hardware but don't expect future AAA titles to run 4K/60. 1080 Ti will be a safer bet.
4K/3560x1440 100Hz+ HDR
- Nothing out there can run this
- Get: 1080 Ti or Pascal Titan and nothing less. 4K 100hz+ w/HDR will likely need SLI 1080 Ti.
Is it worth it to upgrade my 980 Ti to the 1070?
So instead of waiting for price drops in June/July, people should buy in May right before the new cards are released?
This is how I see things...
1080p 60Hz
-Don't upgrade: 780 or above
-Upgrade: 770 or below.
- Get: 1070. Watch Maxwell price drops and used market
1080p 100Hz+
- Don't upgrade: 980, 980 Ti, Titan X
- Upgrade: 970 or below
- Get: 1070
1440p 60Hz
- Don't upgrade: 980 980 Ti, Titan X
- Upgrade: 970 or below
- Get 1070
1440p 100Hz+
-Don't upgrade: 980 Ti, Titan X
-Upgrade: Anything but a 980 Ti, Titan X
- Get 1080 if you are on old hardware, those with Maxwell wait for 1080 Ti w/HBM2
4K 60Hz
- Don't upgrade: SLI 980 Ti or SLI Titan X
- Upgrade: Everybody else
- Get: 1080 if on old hardware but don't expect future AAA titles to run 4K/60. 1080 Ti will be a safer bet.
4K/3560x1440 100Hz+ HDR
- Nothing out there can run this
- Get: 1080 Ti or Pascal Titan and nothing less. 4K 100hz+ w/HDR will likely need SLI 1080 Ti.
So I have a 980ti. Is it worth using the "Step It Up" Program to get the 1080 or would you guys recommend just waiting for the 1080ti/Titan eventually and selling the 980ti on ebay or something?
My main focus is VR. If the 1080 isn't a whole lot faster or faster at all I feel it might be just worth waiting on for something that really is a big step up.
980ti owners, what are your plans?
My 970 is already outdated![]()
Last year I went from 7970 to 290X to maintain 1080p/high/60 at comfortable margin. But now it is starting to feel like the later 7970 years again. Reason being that the upcoming X1.5/PS4K could reset the "High" baseline.390X right now is pretty damn cheap, and I don't see it dropping substantially in a month or two. Though its not like I'll be getting one tomorrow anyway but it isn't a bad thing for those running something like my 770 4GB to just get a 390X/980ti as it'll more than cover them even with these upcoming cards.
that sounds like a pain in the ass, doesn't gsync and freesync fix that?
Already? It's almost 2 years old, If anything it took too long for it to get "outdated". (I also have a 970)My 970 is already outdated![]()
I have an R9 290 4gb with a stock cooler. It performs ok for the most part (I wouldn't mind more power), my main issue is how damn loud it is. Kind of a redundant question given the lack of information at the moment but would these be a good upgrade?
Still happy with my GTX760.
Stock cooler on R9 290 is awful. Not only it was loud, but it would throttle a lot I changed it for a 30 aftermarket cooler, not only the thing is damn silent but it never goes past 74°C. The stock cooler reach 94°C easily... and then throttles your GPU hard. You're easily losing 20% of performances thanks to the GPU throttling.
Guy who knows NOTHING about PCs, but needs one for VR with another (dumb?) question:
Could these new cards, although apparently not being a lot more powerful, have something that would be specifically beneficial for VR?