Did you read Ultimate Spider-Man?And why would a film not revolve around a comic books universe or multi-verse?
Here's an example: Spiderman 1,2,3. Didn't follow the comics and bombed.
Superman sucked horribly and didn't follow the comics.
Andrew Garfield wanted the reboot to follow the comics origin and did great.
Sure that if things were changed to better the films overall story, I don't see why it shouldn't.
Please, don't let nostalgia blind you. Halo 3 is an awful game.
More complicated? LOL. You yield, and then you go. And it's much more quick than a 4-way stop.
Dragon Age II and Assassin's Creed: Revelations are $10 each at Bestbuy right now.
Should I pull the trigger?
Took me a sec to unravel what I think is an accidental use of a double negative, but I think I get what you're saying. Sometimes comic history can be very convoluted, or dense or it simply does not work in cinema depending on the style a director is going for.And why wouldn't a film not revolve around a comic books universe or multi-verse?
Factually incorrect. All 3 Spider-Man films were huge box office successes. Spider-Man 3 is just a very bad movie and the fault doesn't lie with it not sticking closely to the comics.Here's a horrible example: Spiderman 1,2,3. Didn't follow the comics and bombed.
Andrew Garfield is an actor, not a director. The reboot was a success because it's a genuinely great movie. Sticking closely to the source material is the frosting on an already delicious and moist cake.Andrew Garfield wanted the reboot to follow the comics origin and did great.
That's basically what it all boils down to. The comics serve as reference materials, a source of ideas for directors and screenwriters to pull from, unless they are straight up adapting a story like the Lord of the Rings films. Even then, certain segments of the books are might be cut (they were), or certain elements might be changed to accommodate a different format or a modified story (this also happened). Christopher Nolan isn't adapting any specific Batman story, but instead pulling ideas from a ton of sources including Year One, The Long Halloween, No Man's Land, Knightfall and The Dark Knight Returns.Sure that if things were changed to better the films overall story, I don't see why it shouldn't.
Well said.Because the number of people who would see a Batman movie if done well is much greater than the number of people that give a fuck about comic book continuity, so tying a film to something as silly as a multi-verse filled with ridiculous and impenetrable history is a needless burden.
That would be because films are usually one and done. An ongoing comic book series needs to keep reusing a stable of villians.Yes. Many flaws were made in the films when comparing to the Ultimate Spiderman Comics. Villains were killed in the films but in the Ultimate Spider-Man sent them to prison.
Yes. Many flaws were made in the films when comparing to the Ultimate Spiderman Comics. Villains were killed in the films but in the Ultimate Spider-Man sent them to prison.Did you read Ultimate Spider-Man?
Ahh Thank you for clarifying all this.Took me a sec to unravel what I think is an accidental use of a double negative, but I think I get what you're saying. Sometimes comic history can be very convoluted, or dense or it simply does not work in cinema depending on the style a director is going for.
For example, people would have probably scoffed if Nolan used the Lazarus Pits in his movies to revive Ra's al Ghul. That supernatural element simply does not fit in his more realistic take on the Batman mythos.
Factually incorrect. All 3 Spider-Man films were huge box office successes. Spider-Man 3 is just a very bad movie and the fault doesn't lie with it not sticking closely to the comics.
And like Hypertrooper said, see Ultimate Spider-Man.
Andrew Garfield is an actor, not a director. The reboot was a success because it's a genuinely great movie. Sticking closely to the source material is the frosting on an already delicious and moist cake.
That's basically what it all boils down to. The comics serve as reference materials, a source of ideas for directors and screenwriters to pull from, unless they are straight up adapting a story like the Lord of the Rings films. Even then, certain segments of the books are might be cut (they were), or certain elements might be changed to accommodate a different format or a modified story (this also happened). Christopher Nolan isn't adapting any specific Batman story, but instead pulling ideas from a ton of sources including Year One, The Long Halloween, No Man's Land, Knightfall and The Dark Knight Returns.
I never said that the Batman films shouldn't try to stay close to the source material, all I was trying to say is that the two continuities are completely separate entities. Nolan's films exist in a vacuum, they're not some sort of parallel Earth to the comics.
Well said.
Worst roads in north America goes to Montreal. Potholes galore and just poorly maintained roads
Fixing one problem out of many problems doesn't make Halo 3 mighty. The game would still have nerfed utility weapons, horrible linear aggressive maps, ineffective strafes, rockets with the blast radius of a wimpy fart, and many more problems I don't want to type.
Please, don't let nostalgia blind you. Halo 3 is an awful game.
Also Cartoon/Animated Series.That would be because films are usually one and done. An ongoing comic book series needs to keep reusing a stable of villians.
Yeah...Canada is part of North America, the American continent is divided into Central America, north America and South America.
Either That or he was referring to the highways in the USA that lead to Montreal.
Most important question. I want some interaction when I bagTo anyone who has played Halo 4, what's the word on the ragdolls? Can you interact with them like Halo 3? Or are the unmovable like in Reach?
We do, but they are called CHAOS VORTICES here. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=479765&highlight=weakness+vacuum
Why is Infection in Anniversary FFA? There's an entire playlist dedicated to Infection. Why is it appearing elsewhere?
I could understand if it were changed, like BTB Snipers (8v8 instead of 4v4).
Why is Infection in Anniversary FFA? There's an entire playlist dedicated to Infection. Why is it appearing elsewhere?
I could understand if it were changed, like BTB Snipers (8v8 instead of 4v4).
Roundabouts don't work in America because American drivers do not understand the concept of this road sign:
I laughed pretty hard at this.We do, but they are called CHAOS VORTICES here. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=479765&highlight=weakness+vacuum
Just got back from TDKR. Excellent film, TDK is definitively better though for those that like to compare.
Halo 3 makes Reach look like one of the greatest games of all time. That bad.
How did this blue car teleport?!
Roundabouts don't work in America because American drivers do not understand the concept of this road sign:
Halo 3 makes Reach look like one of the greatest games of all time. That bad.
trolling???
Halo 3 has its fair share of shortcomings. I died a little inside today when I saw that you only need about 3 bullets from an AR to kill someone with a single beat down and then saw that you need 3 BR bursts for a melee to kill. So bad.
Halo 3 has its fair share of shortcomings. I died a little inside today when I saw that you only need about 3 bullets from an AR to kill someone with a single beat down and then saw that you need 3 BR bursts for a melee to kill. So bad.
Holy shit. Power just came back!
Thank you Jesus.
Mobile. Public wifi.I do not understand how you were posting without power. Internet anywhere wireless stick thingy I assume?
Achievements dude.Why is Infection in Anniversary FFA? There's an entire playlist dedicated to Infection. Why is it appearing elsewhere?
I could understand if it were changed, like BTB Snipers (8v8 instead of 4v4).
Infection isn't even a free-for-all gametype. It's a team of humans against a team of zombies.
Halo 3 makes Reach look like one of the greatest games of all time. That bad.