Guerrillas in the Mist
Member
Why the fuck did I buy a Seagate drive for my second drive?
It's kind of crazy that HGST is the most reliable, because it was originally the IBM drive division that created the least reliable hard drive model ever.
.Seagate is garbage.
Some things will never change.
As before, this doesn't mean that anyone with a Seagate disk is at risk of an imminent hard disk failure (though you should always have backups!). Backblaze operates disks outside of the manufacturer's specified parameters.
So you operate hard drives outside the manufacturers parameters and publish data to the world about their failure rate. SMH.
Too be honest if they are reliable outside parameters they should be even more reliable within them. People shouldn't just look at the graph because it's misleading because as Back Blaze suggests "All hard drives will eventually fail, but based on our environment if you are looking for good drive at a good value, its hard to beat the current crop of 4 TB drives from HGST and Seagate." within the same report.So you operate hard drives outside the manufacturers parameters and publish data to the world about their failure rate. SMH.
Few months ago they toyed with using eco drives in their storage pods and it was disaster. Power cut offs were to frequent ect.It's how almost everything in the world is stress tested.
So you operate hard drives outside the manufacturers parameters and publish data to the world about their failure rate. SMH.
So you operate hard drives outside the manufacturers parameters and publish data to the world about their failure rate. SMH.
This is how stress tests are done.
I think I know a bit more about stress testing hard drives then folks on this board. It's quite possible to push a HD outside it's operational envelope and get it to fail but the drive will still be reliable if operating within the manufactures operational specifications.
I think I know a bit more about stress testing hard drives then folks on this board. It's quite possible to push a HD outside it's operational envelope and get it to fail but the drive will still be reliable if operating within the manufactures operational specifications.
Seagate drives are shit and have been for years, every single drive they make is a ticking time bomb of inevitability.
It's not just consumer drives either the enterprise drives are all sorts hell, the last time I had to use them well forced to use them - thanks HP! - the fail rate was insane.
You can get PCI-Express drives at 3.2TB or more. These are not targeted to standard consumers though.Huh, really?
I went off of a SSD search on PCpartpicker. Got a max of 1.2 TB but those were absurdly priced, the limit of reasonably priced was at 1 TB.
Not true at all in reference to their enterprise drives. I have nearly a thousand enterprise seagates,as well.has Hitachi. From 1tb 3.5's to 4tb. Also a hundred or so 2.5 1tb as members of raid0 stripes. All of these spin almost 24/7. My oldest are 4.x years old, and have been in near constant use since then. Typical use means continuous iterative write then read streams to near capacity for weeks or months at a time.
Although, this is in a climate controlled data center with perfectly clean power, as well.as almost zero power cycles. Also properly.cooled hand well engineered hardware.
Bravo! But because your experience is different to mine doesn't mean its not true. There is a reason HP now use Hitachi HDs in all of there disk storage systems (StoreServ etc) now.
Ah, an expert are you?
Only that Seagate are consistently shite in real world reliability and Backblaze's experience using them in servers (not exactly dropping them from buildings) seems to corroborate this.
Well, shit. Looks like im fucked.
A nearly 45% failure rate is insane. How are they allowed to even sell such a broken product?
As before, this doesn't mean that anyone with a Seagate disk is at risk of an imminent hard disk failure (though you should always have backups!). Backblaze operates disks outside of the manufacturer's specified parameters.
Seagate bought WD last year so prepare for everything to suck or get better.
http://www.storagenewsletter.com/ru...-wd-for-16-billion-new-company-named-seawest/
Seagate bought WD last year so prepare for everything to suck or get better.
http://www.storagenewsletter.com/ru...-wd-for-16-billion-new-company-named-seawest/