TheLegendary
Member
Did Victor check the vector?
He didnt have clearance, Clarence.
Did Victor check the vector?
Wasn't the golf course one a forced landing due to plane malfunction? I think it wasn't his fault, and that he avoided a bigger disaster by staying clear of residential areas.http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/03/entertainment/harrison-ford-faa-investigation/
Was following some google links and apparently he's been cleared of the incident. Kind of mind blowing really. Everyone is human and makes mistakes but damn when your mistakes seriously endanger the lives of over 100 people...wonder how big of a check he had to cut for this.
I'd be scared shitless to be in the vicinity when he's out flying. He crashed a plane on a golf course and apparently he's also crashed a helicopter and also clipped a runway.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/04/03/entertainment/harrison-ford-faa-investigation/
Was following some google links and apparently he's been cleared of the incident. Kind of mind blowing really. Everyone is human and makes mistakes but damn when your mistakes seriously endanger the lives of over 100 people...wonder how big of a check he had to cut for this.
I'd be scared shitless to be in the vicinity when he's out flying. He crashed a plane on a golf course and apparently he's also crashed a helicopter and also clipped a runway.
Wasn't the golf course one a forced landing due to plane malfunction? I think it wasn't his fault, and that he avoided a bigger disaster by staying clear of residential areas.
how did he make the mistake?
by being careless
I'd say he was grossly negligent. He came dangerously close to a fuelled airliner full of passengers on that taxiway.
In an industry that has investigations into near misses based upon hundreds of meters to a mile of distance, you can't dismiss this as a mistake.
None of his previous incidents prior to this were his fault. He actually was praised for what he did about the gold plane crash, he did all he could to avoid landing it in an area with a lot of people.
Yep, exactly.
It's a weird double-edged sword. He gets to keep his license, but the whole world knows he's a terrible pilot.Being rich and famous allows you to get away with a lot of shit. After all his incidents he shouldn't be allowed to have a license anymore.
But the fact he keeps having these incidents, his fault or not, means he has been extremely lucky to have not killed himself or anyone else. Eventually that luck is going to run out. If my 74 year old grandfather kept having incidents in his car, I think it would be time to have a family intervention and teach him how to uber.
People used to say the same thing about my ex.
They haven't revoked his license yet? Never mind his track record of incidents, dude gets injured on the sets of fake aircraft.
Today the FAA released the ATC audio of the incident.
https://www.faa.gov/data_research/accident_incident/2017-02-13/
Here is an excellent visualization of what happened with the audio synchronized.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzy9jCFk0Iw
People used to say the same thing about my ex.
The FAA considers the filing of a report with NASA concerning an incident or occurrence involving a violation of 49 U.S.C. subtitle VII or the 14 CFR to be indicative of a constructive attitude. Such an attitude will tend to prevent future violations. Accordingly, although a finding of violation may be made, neither a civil penalty nor certificate suspension will be imposed if:
The violation was inadvertent and not deliberate;
The violation did not involve a criminal offense, accident, or action under 49 U.S.C. § 44709, which discloses a lack of qualification or competency, which is wholly excluded from this policy;
The person has not been found in any prior FAA enforcement action to have committed a violation of 49 U.S.C. subtitle VII, or any regulation promulgated there for a period of 5 years prior to the date of occurrence; and
The person proves that, within 10 days after the violation, or date when the person became aware or should have been aware of the violation, he or she completed and delivered or mailed a written report of the incident or occurrence to NASA.
NOTE: Paragraph 9 does not apply to air traffic controllers, who are covered under the provisions of the Air Traffic Safety Action Program (ATSAP), as described in the ATSAP Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).