Are you saying that you're voting LoC because you think he's voldemort, or is this just a standard avatar quote response?
I'm only worried in Killing a good Player with a Power Role before he/she can use the power at least one time.
Exactly, which is why Burb should probably die today. Kill the known quantity, and clean the conversation slate.
I'm not voting yet to avoid any mischief, but I will firmly say at this point that barring any unforseen occurrences I will be voting Burb.
For me Flame_AC has been acting a bit aggressive for some time now, he has been pushing my lynch lot of his posts ever since he noted that he was running for being the top leader in votes. It's kinda interesting, though for now I can't really pinpoint if it gives my scumvibes or not. Trying to kickstart a bandwagon...?
Vote: No Lynch
Reasoning: no lynch is better than lynching Burb. There's a huge chance he's town, and he does not need to be a subject of conversation moving forward. I'm fine with trusting him unless we get information otherwise.
Vote: No Lynch
I'm distracting town player only if you want to think so, Flame. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Crabs vote is still on me on the count.
So you don't think that on Day 2/3/4 when you haven't been killed during the night, that it would be extremely suspicious? A 'confirmed' town player is a mafia's worst enemy as the town can coalesce around them. If the Death Eaters leave you be for a couple of days, no one here will trust you and you will once again be the focus of conversation. I'd rather talk about other people too, but I know that you will be a topic so long as you survive.
Are you saying that you're voting LoC because you think he's voldemort, or is this just a standard avatar quote response?
So you don't think that on Day 2/3/4 when you haven't been killed during the night, that it would be extremely suspicious? A 'confirmed' town player is a mafia's worst enemy as the town can coalesce around them. If the Death Eaters leave you be for a couple of days, no one here will trust you and you will once again be the focus of conversation. I'd rather talk about other people too, but I know that you will be a topic so long as you survive.
I'm surely biased on this case, because I am the topic of conversation here, but I will say that I could be an easy target for bandwagoning, at least for Scum team.
This might go bit meta, but in the last game (NX Mafia), when a Miller claimed D1, this was the first reactions of the scum team:
Scum 1: Did not comment, said he would think about it later. Did not really return to the subject.
Scum 2: I believe the claim, but could be a problem, might need to lynch said person.
Scum 3: I believe the claim, maybe shouldn't lynch. I will accept lynch, if we obtain information about it.
Might not mean anything, but both Scums who commented there had kinda similar first reactions.
I get that, but that's why it's a good idea to get Burb right now. We know what he is and so we won't run the risk of eliminating someone with a great role, unless of course he lied to us.
Maybe it's because he is Darth Icky XD
I will post at least once before the the deadline, unfortunately can't right now...
You both are making an anti-town move in voting for a no lynch. Burb is likely town, but he is a distracting town that Death Eaters can focus the daily conversation on. The longer Burb stays alive, the more his claim falls apart and the more we have to believe him.
Is there anything I can do to convince either of you?
hey, if the 'No Lynch' option gets majority vote, will Burb be off the hook
Yes.
hey, if the 'No Lynch' option gets majority vote, will Burb be off the hook
Yes.
Be sure to vote.
Mods backing me up here, VOTE
Also everyone voting no lynch is on my suspicion list for the following days. You're letting scum make the first play here
It's exactly this mentality that will lead the Mafia to keep me alive, to make people like you keep mentioning me time and time again, and make the game distracted from the game.
However consider this:
In this case, is the fault really on me?
Or is it on the players who do keep putting me as the main topic of the day, people who would not like to talk about other players, other than me?
I would say definitely the latter. And there is a good chance there would be scums there. Could very well be in Day 1 too.
Scums 2/3 both fit this criteria. They both believed said Miller was the real deal, yet pushed lightly on the Miller's lynch. However, in this case the Miller did not stay as the hot potato-topic of the game, even though he survived almost until the end (was NK'd).
I just noticed what time this Day Phase ends and I won't be here around that time. Or for 7 to 8 hours before that either. That's the time I get up and drive to work so I will be a no show for end of the day shenanigans for this game unless the time changes. Sorry folks.
While I wholeheartedly agree we should keep you alive it seems like a good amount of the others don't think this should be the case. I know it's Day 1 so they aren't going to be strong but could you post a list of reads on everyone? Specifically with your 'Miller Scum Tell' points in mind? If you do end up being lynched and flip Town then it would be really beneficial for us if you have your thoughts down.
I disagree. Yeah, if burbeting stays alive, he will always be a thought in the back of our minds and may be discussed during the day, but you make it sound like that would prevent us from talking about other things. Day phases are 4 days long, I think we can talk about burbeting and other people at the same time.
I think that Burb should live today but if we still have a no lynch lead tomorrow then I will change my vote to him. Ideally someone else would also be in the running by that time and I would vote for them. Who that is is the problem.
It's exactly this mentality that will lead the Mafia to keep me alive, to make people like you keep mentioning me time and time again, and make the game distracted from the game.
However consider this:
In this case, is the fault really on me?
Or is it on the players who do keep putting me as the main topic of the day, people who would not like to talk about other players, other than me?
I'll unvote for now, and think about it tonight/later tomorrow morning(europe time).
UNVOTE
So if I play mafia with you again, and I am miller, I should stay quiet because your policy is to just get rid of any doubt? There is going to be doubt if Burb goes, or if he stays. If anything I should start to consider voting you because you are making an anti-town move, getting rid of someone who is most likely town.
Mods backing me up here, VOTE
Also everyone voting no lynch is on my suspicion list for the following days. You're letting scum make the first play here
Yeah, at least until later in the game. We eliminate a source of conflict on later days as that is exactly what the Death Eaters would want, they want us to focus on someone like Burb who is somehow still alive on like Day 5. If you think what I'm doing is anti-town, well, I just don't understand your reasoning. All I want to do is make it so we have a good Day 2 or Day 3, this day is always going to be bad for the town, but it is a necessary evil for us to gain information.
I could post reads on everyone, but problem is that so many people have said so little, that there will be lot of "dunno what to think about this person" with just four to five pages of posts/28 players. But I'll look on what I can do, at least with the Miller reactions.
Yeah, at least until later in the game. We eliminate a source of conflict on later days as that is exactly what the Death Eaters would want, they want us to focus on someone like Burb who is somehow still alive on like Day 5. If you think what I'm doing is anti-town, well, I just don't understand your reasoning. All I want to do is make it so we have a good Day 2 or Day 3, this day is always going to be bad for the town, but it is a necessary evil for us to gain information.
From what I understand, the gathering of information is based on what we vote, not on who is killed, so that information is already there, no matter what. As far as creating conflict in later days, can't you just say that it's acting anti-town like you are right now with me, and target them?
Flame keeps pushing me as the main topic + Scums wanting most likely to keep me main topic = Flame is ???
What info can be gained there, especially if Burb dies now?
I don't like a No Lynch as much as you do but I don't see why lynching Burb gains us info.
Vote means Voting No Lynch is perfectly valid, if you don´t vote any way you want it does not count as No Lynch.
Listen, you say that if I survive more than the first night, I will be surely the main hot potato of the game for rest of the game as well. This is exactly what the Scum would want, which would keep me alive, thus then validate your theory. So yes, it would be a very self-fulfilling prophecy.
I'm not saying that questioning me is a bad thing, on the contrary, it's propably a good thing to do. But it does not need to be the main topic of day 1, nor later days if I stay alive. It only becomes a main topic of conversation every day, if people make it so. Let's put it this way: Right now only one pushing me to the main topic of conversation is you, Flame.
The Scum team knows I'm not a Scum. Also, for them it would be beneficial to keep me the main topic for all the times, so people wouldn't think about other people. Team Scum would most likely also want to push for my lynch any day too, as it would be a very safe lynch for them. They might want to keep me alive for few more days just to spin this narrative.
Flame keeps pushing me as the main topic + Scums wanting most likely to keep me main topic = Flame is ???
I'm still sticking with not voting as I don't have a half-decent read on anybody yet. I will eventually vote since a "no lynch" vote seems counter-productive as hell for town because scum will have an advantage on us after the night phase.
I don't think I understand what you're getting at. I'm not looking to create conflict, I'm trying to eliminate someone who I think will hurt discussion moving forward. I don't think we can ignore him if we simply allow him to live on Day 2/3/4/5, the longer he lives, the more likely he is to take a day's discussion.
What I was trying to say is, right now you are calling me scum for not wanting to eliminate Burb as you think (and it very well could) it will cause distractions in the future days. I'm suggesting that the people who cause major distractions like that could also be seen as scum.
DA MEMBERS
1. CM
2. Kawl
3. BSP
4. Burb
5. Roy
6. Rynam
7. Gorlak
8. TheExodu5
I don't buy Burb being a Miller but I think he's Snape.
swamped, care to tell me why did you put Exodu5 in your "top town" list, when he had posted just two sentences long post before it? It seemed kinda weird inclusion, since at that point he had not said anything, really (which has changed now, obviously). You mentioned something about him responding to you about something, but could you point out to me what it was, because I seriously can't find it. At this point I feel like you put him there for no reason, so bit more explanation would be good.
I'm still inclined to believe Burb honestly. I think there was way to much risk for him to claim this early. I feel bad for him too. It's a fucked role. Claim now and risk possible death or claim after investigation and risk certain death. Do or don't certainly.
Im not sure who to lynch today. I'm kinda leaning Blarg because of how distracting he'll be but I'm not sure enough to cast. Not enough info yet. I'll mull it over today and make a gut call.
Ill probably throw a pressure vote out later at the very least.
Exactly, which is why Burb should probably die today. Kill the known quantity, and clean the conversation slate.
The easy choice isn't necessarily a bad one.
I'm not voting yet to avoid any mischief, but I will firmly say at this point that barring any unforseen occurrences I will be voting Burb.
UnVote: Matt Attack
I don't have much time at the moment, but somebody had a solid reasoning against burb until he mentioned letting neutrals win because it's fun. Have to look into this tomorrow, it was really weird to read.
Some of you are nervous about hitting a powerful role, and four of you are even voting for the dreaded No Lynch. I am offering myself as a safe lynch target for today. Put your vote on me, and we can eliminate a liability.
Alright, here's my crazy logic for the day. Some scum likely voted for KK. Some Scum would have avoided him to avoid association with other scum. Would the Scum have simply not voted? Doubtful, considering how much we harped on it, and the fact that they would have gotten pressure from their own chat as well.
So if we go with the smaller pool of players, we had 4 votes NOT on KK. Nin and myself voted for Sorian. Hyper and Kalor voted for Salva. I know that I'm not Mafia, and I'm pretty certain that Nin isn't, thanks to Cabot. So for now, I'm going to vote for either Hyper or Kalor. I'll switch with Kalor initially, because I still worry about him from D1.
Vote: Kalor
Cabot, if you agree with this in general, post a corgi meme. Everyone else, get your votes in somewhere, please. It's irritating to see 3 people didn't vote yesterday.
Alright guys. I wanted to let this day play out as naturally as possible before dropping this, and now we're approaching the deadline. I promise you, this isn't a gambit. I didn't come to this decision lightly, but I believe it's for the best.
I am Town, and I have a role. But I consider my role to be very anti-Town. Ideally I would simply choose not to utilize it, but that choice won't always be given to me. I believe I am too dangerous to be kept alive. I am intentionally being vague about this, because if I survive into the night, the enemy could use this information against us.
Some of you are nervous about hitting a powerful role, and four of you are even voting for the dreaded No Lynch. I am offering myself as a safe lynch target for today. Put your vote on me, and we can eliminate a liability.
I don't have much time at the moment, but somebody had a solid reasoning against burb until he mentioned letting neutrals win because it's fun. Have to look into this tomorrow, it was really weird to read.
Alright guys. I wanted to let this day play out as naturally as possible before dropping this, and now we're approaching the deadline. I promise you, this isn't a gambit. I didn't come to this decision lightly, but I believe it's for the best.
I am Town, and I have a role. But I consider my role to be very anti-Town. Ideally I would simply choose not to utilize it, but that choice won't always be given to me. I believe I am too dangerous to be kept alive. I am intentionally being vague about this, because if I survive into the night, the enemy could use this information against us.
Some of you are nervous about hitting a powerful role, and four of you are even voting for the dreaded No Lynch. I am offering myself as a safe lynch target for today. Put your vote on me, and we can eliminate a liability.
What an interesting gambit you are running, could you possibly elaborate on what might happen if you stay alive?
I still think flame is underestimating the ability of this group to ensure Burb doesn't become to much of a distraction. I think we have plenty of good players that will prevent that from happening. And yeah, scum may try to use Burb as a sort of "emergency plan" to try to get attention away if one of them is becoming a topic of discussion. But if they do that, we could use that kind of behavior to try and find more scum,and take a good hard look at the people that wanted to shift discussion to Burb.
Unfortunately, I'm basing my reasoning on other games where once there's a topic, it never disappears. This happened with Blarg and Cthulhu, and what can I say, it jaded me.