Wasn't it just oneGodhand the thread.
I thought it had good reviews at least, the jump to 60+fps and popularity of DOOM 2016 probably helped.
Windwaker got plenty of praise back then. It was only years later when people started to admit that it didn't have enough dungeons and fishing for Triforce was the absolute shits. It's the worst 3D Zelda.
The topic is about the game not being a big deal for either at the time.I played Doom 64 last year, maybe for console players of that era it was a big deal, compared to the PC FPS games of that era it's an average game.
2007 Crysis iz shit, it's just a tech demah.
2021 Why don't they make games like Crysis anymore?
TP is worse, Skyward Sword is worse. C'mon manWindwaker got plenty of praise back then. It was only years later when people started to admit that it didn't have enough dungeons and fishing for Triforce was the absolute shits. It's the worst 3D Zelda.
Arkane needs more recognition in general.Maybe not on the same level, but I think Prey (2017) only got the recognition it deserves years after its release.
This.Doom 64's revival is helped by now being able to see without cranking the brightness up to 100 on your tv.
As far as systems go it’s Arkane’s most immersive sim game yet, the problem I had with the game and why I stopped playing it are is the shitty loading screen time. You are travelling between different areas constantly and to do that you have to endure the painstakingly long loading screens, it just killed the pacing of the game for me.Maybe not on the same level, but I think Prey (2017) only got the recognition it deserves years after its release.
People with good taste.Who cares about Doom 64?
lol, Nope.I played Doom 64 last year, maybe for console players of that era it was a big deal, compared to the PC FPS games of that era it's an average game.
Demon souls got great reviews though, magazine i read at the time gave it 10/10I can think of a few. Demon's Souls, Gothic, Deadly Premonition, Vampire the Masquerade, God Hand, Pathologic...
So first person shooters used to be called corridor games?Here's how DOOM 64 was received in UK and most of Europe:
The "it's not really DOOM" line is especially ironic reading it nowadays.
Yeah, i remember they used the term "corridor shooters" a lot.So first person shooters used to be called corridor games?
That was after the original release, though. When the game first came out in Japan it got middling reviews and Shuhei Yoshida himself famously thought it was crap. The only reason it later got North American and European releases was due to positive word of mouth from players who had imported Asian copies of the game.Demon souls got great reviews though, magazine i read at the time gave it 10/10
There is no universe in the multiverse where TWW was dismissed at release. If anything, it’s overrated today as it was back then.
Came here to say Driveclub, and I also think for Wind Waker is actually the opposite
Jeff was extremely harsh on games of that era(PS1/N64/Saturn). I respected his opinions even though I didn't always agree because to be fair most of them ran at poor framerates and looked like ass.
I always forget how wrong that dude is about certain things.
Jeff was extremely harsh on games of that era(PS1/N64/Saturn). I respected his opinions even though I didn't always agree because to be fair most of them ran at poor framerates and looked like ass.
So first person shooters used to be called corridor games?
By 1997 it had to compete with games like Blood, Shadow Warrior, Duke Nukem 3D, Quake, Turok and Hexen II, all better more innovative games.lol, Nope.
It's not always a dick measuring contest between games either.
Solid game in 2021 which means it was a solid game in 97.
It didn't need to compete with half of those as they were not available for consoles. Also, Doom 64 became popular because of Doom 64 EX, a port done to the PC. This has nothing to do with historical revisionism. As OP pointed out, the game receiving better reviews now than back then speaks volumes.By 1997 it had to compete with games like Blood, Shadow Warrior, Duke Nukem 3D, Quake, Turok and Hexen II, all better more innovative games.
People acting like Doom 64 was among the best FPS of the era are revisionists Nintendo fanboys.
It didn't need to compete with half of those as they were not available for consoles. Also, Doom 64 became popular because of Doom 64 EX, a port done to the PC. This has nothing to do with historical revisionism. As OP pointed out, the game receiving better reviews now than back then speaks volumes.
Games like Quake or Turok did a whole lot more on the technical side of things and I also would agree that Duke 3D or Blood are better games (I also like those games better than vanilla Doom tbh), however, Doom 64 managed to hold its own over the years and going back to it it's just a very well made shooter. Aesthetically it aged very well and gameplay-wise it is classic Doom. The soundtrack is very dense too. I think a lot of critics back then failed to see the game as its own entity and were too biased because of titles like Quake and Turok so they didn't give Doom 64 a fair shot. Nowadays that doesn't matter much anymore though.but Duke Nukem 3D is a game that came out at the time and a game that was WAY better. Doom 64 is liked these days because it is a somewhat classic style Doom game. it is the retro appeal that people like about it.
It's not just that though.Doom 64 is liked these days because it is a somewhat classic style Doom game. it is the retro appeal that people like about it.