Kilau
Member
Mamma Mia!What is the problem with that.
Mamma Mia!What is the problem with that.
I think I read it's coming to Peacock as soon as it leaves theaters. So those in the US with Xfinity should be able to stream it for free.Will this movie come to Netflix or any streaming service?
I think I read it's coming to Peacock as soon as it leaves theaters. So those in the US with Xfinity should be able to stream it for free.
That's kind of weird. Do they have a major holiday coming up?This movie is yet to release in Japan and South Korea...
That's kind of weird. Do they have a major holiday coming up?
$871,836,610 worldwide now.
Yessir. My feedback:
Good
- Fun to watch with the wife for the various Nintendo tropes
- Target is really going to resonate more with children. Teens not so much. Adults, maybe for some of the game-related gags or a niche of the fandom crowd
- Implementation: Animation was fine for 3D. No hidden socio/poltical signalling in the writing, scoring was great and fully orchestrated
So-so
- Jack Black can't help being the same immature Tencious D-like guy
- John DiMaggio, Carlos Alazraqui and Martinet had minor voice roles. Forgettable big name celebs just don't fit characters for a simple franchise like Mario. Those bigger names took the spotlite for billing of course...
- Simple writing does make it easier to mass market internationally. That said, you can't go in with expectations too. If that's your angle...John Wick: 4 is still in select theaters
Other than that, if you have the time give it a go. Or...wait for it to roll out on streaming platforms.
To be fair too, not all big named celebs like Robin Williams hurt the movies they voice acted in. They fit the roles and sometimes exceeded. However, the majority (especially today) are not attached to the role as you'll see at a table reading with real voice actors. They can't identify with fictional cartoon characters of which they have no interest. But they add some effort for the large salary and royalties which minor VAs could only dream of seeing.The bolded. I have to add before 1992 Aladdin, animated films almost never used big name celebs. Robin Williams was the voice of the genie in that film and he was hesitant to take the role, because he was worried that voice actors would lose out to real live action movie stars. He was hoping that wouldn't be the case, but he was wrong. Now very good voice actors don't get these parts that they might be suited for, it goes now to big name celebs. Just check out the voice actors in films like the Little Mermaid (1989), Beauty and the Beast (1991), etc. They aren't movie stars, just established voice actors and people who worked on Broadway. Now check the voice actors after 1992 like Toy Story 1, Lion King 1994, etc. What do you see? Big name recognizable movie stars.
Unfortunately I've seem some youtubers calling the whole peach anti-damsel in distress as liberal brainwashing.Yessir. My feedback:
Good
- Fun to watch with the wife for the various Nintendo tropes
- Target is really going to resonate more with children. Teens not so much. Adults, maybe for some of the game-related gags or a niche of the fandom crowd
- Implementation: Animation was fine for 3D. No hidden socio/poltical signalling in the writing, scoring was great and fully orchestrated
Yup. The movie releases on Fri Apr 28 in Japan, then Golden Week starts on Sat Apr 29, 2023 and runs through Fri May 5, 2023.Golden Week in Japan is coming up.
Really? I mean, didn't the Super Mario Bros. 2 game feature Peach as a playable character? Meaning, way back in the 80's you could play her as the 'anti-damsel in distress' till the end of the game. This is people reading way too far into this...there's no political/sociological whitewashing. I've seen (although I wish I hadn't) modern Disney movies where I'd be notioned to say that is the case. However, this movie was just writing a simple story that'd target children.Unfortunately I've seem some youtubers calling the whole peach anti-damsel in distress as liberal brainwashing.
The US version did.Really? I mean, didn't the Super Mario Bros. 2 game feature Peach as a playable character? Meaning, way back in the 80's you could play her as the 'anti-damsel in distress' till the end of the game. This is people reading way too far into this...there's no political/sociological whitewashing. I've seen (although I wish I hadn't) modern Disney movies where I'd be notioned to say that is the case. However, this movie was just writing a simple story that'd target children.
I guess too, being a fan of retro anime (before the whole thing became weeby); having strong female protags that weren't inserted as feminist icons worked. Hard to see someone watch the original Gunbuster OVAs, Project A-Ko, Gunsmith Cats or even the original Gunnm (Battle Angle). Female protags who were tough but without any type of messaging. Again, comparing Mario movie to that too is a bit beyond as well. The Mario Movie was much more simple and the writing.
Now, I'd change that take if we were talking a movie where Mario & Luigi both get abducted and a muscular Peach has to save the Kingdoms. That'd be a step closer to modern Disney.