Yeah but Bayonetta isnt a JRPG. Its a straight up action game. Where is the role playing in it?
It's an RPG from Japan, that's it.Its a dumb term because it doesnt mean anything. It cannot even be defined. But its probably too late to convince everyone to stop using it.
No.It's an RPG from Japan, that's it.
Until some western indie rpg comes along. I agree with you but its not a concensus.It's an RPG from Japan, that's it.
FUck the consensus.Until some western indie rpg comes along. I agree with you but its not a concensus.
Yes.
I live in Japan (not an expert tho) and luckily all that garbage is not even a blip on anyone’s radar here. It’s why FF16 unapologetically didn’t have a cast that was made to look like The Magic School Bus.Good. Intersectional marxism inserts itself in everything intentionally with the express intent to divide and conquer. Oppressors and all that lot. Not saying that people and groups of all types that abuse or subjugate don't or haven't existed or continue to exist. I'm of the mindset that Japan has a lengthy and storied history in entertainment much less the videogame industry, and have developed a prestigious reputation(which some dislike greatly for various reasons). If anything, and its opening a different can of worms with a set of people, is the claim that Jrpg can only mean anime style games, or cliched Final Fantasy style games. For me personally I use Japanese Role Playing Game to refer to a game that has rpg mechanics that was made in Japan. Not western and inspired by, not Korean or Chinese etc. It can take any form(turn-based, action, strategy etc) or artstyle. FromSoft for example russles a few jimmies and I suspect it is due to people experiencing cognitive dissonance when liking something more to their tastes, but disliking the association to other Japanese games that predominantly utilize different themes and stereotypes. Rooted in insecurities essentially.
His opinion in regards to retro is fair. Retro denotes a throwback, more of a fad as he said. Something stylistic to reference something that once was, whereas at the time those things were the norm. And again to my point made in other threads throughout the years, the fact that there is even a label for catagorizing Jrpgs, unlike the generalized term of western rpg is profound and frankly very impressive. That little island nation boasts so much imagination and brainpower, not to mention sheer creativity that its arguably competing with the world for decades says quite a lot. Now I know that not everybody has had access to the same tech and resources to cultivate the skillsets and interests required to build up a game development industry, but damn if it isn't impressive. And all this time later I'm still excited for upcoming Jrpgs as well as enjoy watching documentaries on Japanese game development and Jrpg history.
At its root the claim that Jrpg is discriminatory is by grifters looking to lump their works(or those they like) in with the games that developed such a legacy. I suspect it also coincides with those that dislike the traditionalism that is displayed in many eastern works. Beauty, femininity, heterosexuality, traditional gender roles. Even when those roles are reversed, or some unique characters or situations are presented, it is not the norm, and that goes against the cultural revolution that's been taking place in the west these past few years if not decades.
"There was definitely a time when games like Elder Scrolls: Oblivion, Mass Effect, Dragon Age, Fallout 3, The Witcher etc were getting tons of mainstream attention"There was definitely a time when games like Elder Scrolls: Oblivion, Mass Effect, Dragon Age, Fallout 3, The Witcher etc were getting tons of mainstream attention, while at the same time JRPGs kinda shit the bed.
DQ and FF hadn’t made the leap to HD yet. Series like Suikoden/Breath of Fire/Lunar/Seiken Densetsu/Grandia either went handheld/mobile or committed seppuku. The few next gen JRPGs we did get were mostly mediocre cringey weeb trash (Infinite Undiscovery, Enchanted Arms, Blue Dragon, Last Remnant, Star Ocean 4).
Many JRPG fans were extremely butthurt seeing JRPGs not receiving the same prestige and interest as WRPGs, and in fact some of them still carry that persecution complex with them to this day.
All you did was post a pic of a game themed off Japanese rpgs. That’s not a JRPG, rather game made to play like one.
I'm dying
All you did was post a pic of a game themed off Japanese rpgs. That’s not a JRPG, rather game made to play like one.
In japan they use terms for East and West rpg?I'm not going to tell people how to feel, but outside of cringy, miserable cunts like Adam Sessler nobody used the term 'JRPG' as a pejorative. It was to differentiate RPGs from the Western RPGs of the time, which were very different games.
Japanese devs falter when they try to cater to what they think Western gamers want. Just do your thing proudly, with your balls hanging out the front of your pants.
The JRPG term originates from the fact that Japan used to have a hugely prominent RPGs that were pretty different from the western kind. There also came to be huge fanbases that solely played these Japanese RPGs but refused to touch any traditional RPG. So they became their own niche. But the term these days is mostly reserved for turn-based Japanese games with stylistic/anime artstyle.To expand on @The Cockatrice 's post (and add much needed context), here is what Yoshida fully said:
Naoki Yoshida Is Not a Fan of the Term 'JRPG'
"It wasn't a compliment to a lot of developers in Japan."www.pushsquare.com
Logically, his gripe kind of adds up. Most western media does not call European RPGs 'EuroRPG', they are just called RPG or WRPG. From Japan's perspective, every other country gets to enjoy the label 'RPG' but them, because they were separated early on in gaming in an odd way, simply because of their point of origin. What makes this even weirder is when you look up eastern region games like 'Genshin Impact' and 'Honkai Star Rail' those are classified as RPG and Turn based RPG, even though from a casual western perspective they might as well be inseparable from the term 'JRPG' and the look of anime, due to their outward appearance. The fact that Korean and Chinese studios can get away with enjoying the RPG label, but Japanese games can't escape the JRPG label, is quite interesting
Unless we have an 80s japan historian on GAF, it seems like many here will simply dismiss this as...well, you can see the above posts, when this has nothing to do with western media or "woke-isms", because well...it's Japan lol.
Yuji Horii (creator of Dragon Quest) defined JRPG as the mixing of Ultima exploration system with Wizardry random battle system and self-proclaimed Dragon Quest to be the blueprint of this genre. I would add character design done by a mangaka.
Ultima (top down, battles on same screen):
Wizardry (First person, random battles, turn based) :
I’m going to consider your post as opinion for now, since you didn’t link any articles or evidence. That being said, what are your thoughts on dev teams from other regions of Asia perfectly emulating JRPGs from top to bottom, but having the luxury of simply being called an RPG?The JRPG term originates from the fact that Japan used to have a hugely prominent RPGs that were pretty different from the western kind. There also came to be huge fanbases that solely played these Japanese RPGs but refused to touch any traditional RPG. So they became their own niche. But the term these days is mostly reserved for turn-based Japanese games with stylistic/anime artstyle.
Looks about the same to me in most photos.Oh my gosh, he gained a lot of weight.
That narrative seems like revisionist history to me. If anything, JRPG was used as a term of endearment by Japanophiles who wanted to separate and distinguish RPGs made in Japan from those icky western RPGs. I've rarely seen it used with a negative connotation.Eh, no, he's wrong. Some other forum told me the "J" in "JRPG" is othering and racist. How dare he.
Why would they be called JRPG when not made in Japan? A car may sound and look Japanese, but if it's not made in Japan, it's not a Japanese car.I’m going to consider your post as opinion for now, since you didn’t link any articles or evidence. That being said, what are your thoughts on dev teams from other regions of Asia perfectly emulating JRPGs from top to bottom, but having the luxury of simply being called an RPG?