Homeless mother who sent son to better school in the wrong town jailed for five years

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't really care about law when they are shit laws. I stated what i thought was proper, not what the law says, was that not obvious?
As long it doesn't matter in the context of reality or justice then it's all good.

In term of reality she got the sentence that law can mandate (& yes I think the law sucks for school district fraud even though the kid getting a better education is not that district's problem).

There's no way to be fined for a non-existent law so I'm not sure why she could just go free from an imaginary POV. Prison or not the woman doesn't deserve to keep her kid in any event.
Drugs pay more than McDonalds, Wal-Mart, Red Lobster, etc. I really do feel sorry for this woman, especially if she wasn't a user while she was selling drugs.
But she was still homeless. If that's the case, she needs budgeting classes.
 
There's no way to be fined for a non-existent law so I'm not sure why she could just go free from an imaginary POV.

Shrug. What does the sentencing look like when you sell alcohol without a license? They should be similar.
 
Shrug. What does the sentencing look like when you sell alcohol without a license? They should be similar.
It's crack, there is no where in the world where you can sell crack, comparing it to selling alcohol without a licence is ridiculous. Then again I doubt you've ever had to encounter crack users.
 
I'm sure the kid will do great in foster care. Totally worth it to remove this violent miscreant from society.

Given the fact that the kid was homeless and his mother had to resort to dealing drugs, I think that the kid will be better off in foster care in this situation.
 
It's crack, there is no where in the world where you can sell crack, comparing it to selling alcohol without a licence is ridiculous. Then again I doubt you've ever had to encounter crack users.

I admit i don't really know how bad of a drug crack cocaine is, but i do know that alcohol ranks pretty high on the dangerous drugs list, and that is sold legally almost everywhere in the world. The legality of the drug is a poor metric to use when comparing them.
 
Taking issue with drug laws is perfectly reasonable, but let's not ignore the reality of the dangers of a homeless mother dealing crack near her children. While it may be true that dealing drugs was her only viable source of income it seems rather unlikely(and in any case would need some kind of substantiation).
 
Yeah group homes are veritable paradises.. What's a little abuse compared to the horror of knowing your mom sold drugs?
Compared to the horror her mom was spreading by selling crack, the small risk of abuse, is worth getting her off the street, not that in any case she should have custody anyway. Also whose to say the child won't be placed with a relative eventually or is guaranteed to be abused in foster care.
 
The number of people that did not read the op is astonishing to me. The thread title is misleading as shit though.

Outside of the drugs, if she weren't black, I don't believe this would be a story.
 
I find it sad how some people immediately look down on this mother for selling drugs. It's pretty impossible here in the united states for someone to get a job, food stamps, or general relief, without a home address. Even if she wanted a job, once they saw she had no residence, that chance for a job goes bye bye.

So, what other professions are out there for a homeless person in America? Prostitution? Maybe, but then she'd have a pimp to deal with, and chances are, that situation would be more dangerous to her than option two: drug dealer. Contrary to popular belief, not all sellers are users, but even so, in her situation, homeless mother of a 6 year old, I can't say I'd blame her for partaking in her wares. I know people who have done coke for less (ie), they come from a wealthy family with not a care in the world, yet they're doing coke left and right).

I feel truly bad for this woman. Wanting a better life for your children, last I checked, was considered being a good parent, yet she is being punished for it, with the drug charge being an unfortunate circumstance that I know doubt think is tied to her homelessness and lack of employment. I can't help bt wonder if she had a home, and a job, would she have been selling drugs?
 
Compared to the horror her mom was spreading by selling crack, the small risk of abuse, is worth getting her off the street, not that in any case she should have custody anyway. Also whose to say the child won't be placed with a relative eventually or is guaranteed to be abused in foster care.
fuck you man, I have an adopted sister that was in foster care who was abused I wouldn't wish that shit on any kid. To say that abuse is worth it is fucking disgusting.
 
fuck you man, I have an adopted sister that was in foster care who was abused I wouldn't wish that shit on any kid. To say that abuse is worth it is fucking disgusting.
Whose fault is it that that child will be in foster care? You're screaming at the wrong person. I didn't say the abuse was worth it, I said the risk was compared to her not going to jail. I also said its entirely possible the child will go with a relative.

. I know people who have done coke for less (ie), they come from a wealthy family with not a care in the world, yet they're doing coke left and right).?
Theyre scum also, less people think I have lesser views of only crack users and dealers.
 
I'm not saying that foster care is ideal, but the kid would have food to eat, a roof over his head, and a bed to sleep on rather than continuing to live in a van with a mother who feels her best option is to deal crack cocaine.

Or he might get abused for years instead of stayImg with a parent who at least cares about his well being. None of the articles indicate that CFS has found her to be neglectful.
 
I know there are a lot of McDonald's workers who aren't homeless...
Also as pointed out in a TED talk, you earn more than dealing crack.

Or he might get abused for years instead of stayImg with a parent who at least cares about his well being. None of the articles indicate that CFS has found her to be neglectful.
I think dealing crack is an example of neglectful parenting and is an example of not caring for his well being. Dealing introduces a ton of risks to the child.
 
I know there are a lot of McDonald's workers who aren't homeless...

I hope you have the intelligence to understand why this comment doesn't mean anything. Why it means absolutely nothing, especially when considering it under her situation.

Anyway, I feel sorry for the parent being locked up (imo, technically she should be considering the drugs), but who I really feel sorry for is the kid. Whatever happens, I hope that later in life the kid won't end up like the parent.
 
Or he might get abused for years instead of stayImg with a parent who at least cares about his well being. None of the articles indicate that CFS has found her to be neglectful.

He might get abused in the foster care system. Who knows where his life with his mother would have led? I agree with you that she cares for him, but the danger to the child doesn't stem from her, directly, but rather from the dangerous elements that she has introduced into their lives through her crack dealing activities.

In either case, the danger is prospective, but I still feel that the risk of abuse in the foster system, when coupled with the benefits I listed earlier, outweigh the risks to the boy if he remained with a mother who deals crack.
 
if only Alcohol was illegal, she could have sold bootleg liquor and become a respected buisinesswoman, a millionairess, or the mother of a powerful political dynasty.
 
To make things clear:

http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/def...ll-sentenced-to-5-years-in-prison-3438014.php
That case drew protests by residents and civil rights groups, who claimed McDowell was being persecuted for her attempt to get a better education for her son.

Iannotti retorted Tuesday that the Norwalk case had nothing to do with why McDowell was before him.

"This case is about the convictions for the sale of narcotics to an undercover police officer," the judge said. "I think you understand that because that is really the essence of what has gotten you into the predicament you find yourself today."
 
I am so glad we got this ruthless monster off our streets. Drug dealing is a gateway to fascism.

This was not her first time to be caught selling drugs. What are you supposed to do about someone who continues illegal activity after they've been told to stop?
 
That's some selective writing in the thread title

She also pleaded guilty to four counts of sale of narcotics, which will be included in her prison sentence. In a separate case, she pleaded guilty on February 7 to selling drugs.

I'm gonna say that weighed more.
 
While it may be true that dealing drugs was her only viable source of income it seems rather unlikely (and in any case would need some kind of substantiation).
It's pretty difficult for someone who is homeless to get a "normal" job. Like, extremely so. If it was as easy as going to McDonald's and getting a job, I'm pretty sure she would've done so. It's a lot easier for people like you and I who likely have a job and a roof over our head and a mailing address and money to pay for identification to go look for work. Without those things it's extremely, extremely difficult.
 
That's some selective writing in the thread title



I'm gonna say that weighed more.
That's only because those laws actually exist.

If they hadn't existed it would have been a travesty to give her that long of a sentence and she should have been fined for no license to sell legal crack.
 
It's pretty difficult for someone who is homeless to get a "normal" job. Like, extremely so. If it was as easy as going to McDonald's and getting a job, I'm pretty sure she would've done so. It's a lot easier for people like you and I who likely have a job and a roof over our head and a mailing address and money to pay for identification to go look for work. Without those things it's extremely, extremely difficult.

She had relatives, at least her mother and aunt, living in the same city. She could have used their addresses.
 
I have no problem with a school district taking steps to ensure the kids at the school belong there. But there is no way in hell I am ever going to agree that it is actual theft or larceny to enroll your kid in a better school. Fuck that noise. I understand that this particular person is going to jail more for the drug dealing than anything else, but the precedent being set here is still fucked up.
 
They are not reading the OP, they're not going to read this. Besides they already moved the goalposts to incorporate the idea that selling crack is a) OK and b) Her only possible life choice.

Whoa, when'd you change your name back?

I have no problem with a school district taking steps to ensure the kids at the school belong there. But there is no way in hell I am ever going to agree that it is actual theft or larceny to enroll your kid in a better school. Fuck that noise. I understand that this particular person is going to jail more for the drug dealing than anything else, but the precedent being set here is still fucked up.

No, she's pretty much going to jail just for the drug dealing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom