Shit, I knew they wanted to reform education in HK, but I had no idea they wanted to remove the Tiananmen incident. That's absolutely disgusting.
It's not even strictly to China anymore either:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/editorials/confucius-institute-chinese-for-conflict-of-interest/article19401054/
Despite its innocuous name, the Confucius Institute functions as little more than a long arm of the Chinese state, pushing its political agenda under the guise of simple language instruction.
Unlike other language and organizations such as the French Alliance Française or the German Goethe-Institut, Confucius Institutes are tightly controlled by China’s one-party state, even while operating directly on Canadian university campuses and school property. The language centres don’t exactly spew Communist Party propaganda, but they hardly embrace a broad definition of Chinese culture. Taiwan, Tibet and Tiananmen Square are never discussed. Beijing virtually guarantees this by handpicking instructors for its overseas teaching assignments.
If this is the kind of stuff that is happening in other countries, you can't exactly blame the Hong Kong people to be worried about exactly what is being taught.
No, I'm just someone who can think and not partial to one party over another and ignore all the factual discriminatory and failed policies from one of the parties.
I'm also not someone who have to use personal attack on another poster as the first resort.
/ignore
Right, you're the one thinking for yourself. Please do show the "discriminatory and failed polices", and how they're currently more detrimental to the current set of failed discriminatory and failed policies, AND interference of actual politics. The people of Hong Kong are looking at what was before, and what is now, and it's a matter of seeing what had worked, and what isn't working. Is the statement of reverting back to British rule naive? Yes, but it's a simplified point that, upon examination, showcases a series of problems that exist.
But then again, it's probably easier for you to just ignore what's going on, the facts, toe the party line and ignore what anyone would say.
EDIT: You know what. Thinking about it. I'm not even going to apologize for it. It physically makes me sick that there somehow, given both sides (China and UK) had signed a treaty dictating what can and is allowed to happen, following the letter of intent is "picking a side" and "had discriminatory and failed policies". You might as well silence opinion like how they'd like people to do so.
Hey, since we're all on the course of disclosure: family moved to Canada in 92, I was 9 at the time, and did understand some of what was happening. Personally, I'm so detached to it now, Hong Kong feels like a part of my history as a place I'd visit because of family, and I do wish it well, but it can go either way and not really affect me. What I do feel sad about though, is the relatives, and mainly knowing that for some of them, what's happening IS affecting them negatively, and they don't actually have full control of their destiny.
For folks who live there or have strong ties to HK:
do the people in HK largely see themselves as members of a broader "China", or do they see themselves as distinct? The situations around HK/Macau/Taiwan are different, of course, but the question of identity and its potential political ramifications has always been really interesting to me...
Distinct, and vocally so. And more importantly, this recent rise in the push for democracy is mostly lead by the 20-30 somethings, the ones who were living through the transition as teens to young adults. Some of the older generation had resigned to the fact that the diminishment of Hong Kong as a distinct society was inevitable (and some of those were the ones that left), while very few carried on with the cause.
Interesting to bring in Taiwan into the equation: I'm honestly not familiar with how their political feelings about this currently, but I've always understood it that many have observed Hong Kong as the potential test for a unified China that integrated Taiwan. I wonder if they're looking at Hong Kong right now and going "...nope, no thanks".