Looks like the fat kid in Stand By Me, but with big red hair.
Aren't all of them into girls?Are there any other main female main protagonists from active Sony first party IP or is it just Ellie and Aloy?
Chloe Frazer i guess?
Same people complaining about this are also probably furiously jacking it to rule 34 porn of these characters.
Can attest to this. I finished Forbidden West last night. It’s pretty to look at and smooth to play. But it’s a solid 7 in terms of overall game and gameplay. I enjoyed it but it’s not going down as an all time favourite. The writing is annoying, Aloy is totally one dimensional, and its big moments, big reveals and boss fights, fall flat.With or without the lesbian love option forbidden west and the dlc are at best a solid 7/10 imho. And if it didn’t have the graphics and production values it’s sure a very Ubisoft like boring experience but more polished. Zero dawn at least was a little bit more enjoyable. On Forbidden west even many of its main missions were boring. This game is not close to NDs or God of Wars top notch quality….. to me even Spider-Man franchise of insomniac is better! And it’s not about the fans or some angry metacritic users ….. forbidden west won almost ZERO AWARDS! That says it all.
Okay, but then you don't really have an argument here. You're not actually critiquing the game on its own merits. You're saying: “It has a gay main character, therefore it's “woke and political”.There's nothing specifically about the way that Horizon introduces it that is political, and it could be that it isn't. But it's just too much of a coincidence for me to believe.
You misunderstood what I was saying about virtually all game developers: not that they all make their characters gay, but that they're very politically correct and often enthusiastic fighters in the culture wars. This has been my consistent experience when encountering them.
And here is the issue with that: You're setting up these insane arbitrary rules that developers must follow, and if they don't follow these rules that you've set up then it means that it's “pandering” or “ticking the boxes”.Not politics, plain old opportunism.
If it was stated, or strongly hinted that Aloy was lesbian early in the first game, nobody would even bother with this in the DLC of the second one.
But adding this in the DLC, accessible only after finishing the second game, seems opportunistic and a rushed decision just to tick the "inclusivity" box they forgot when making the main game.
I'm all for as many gay characters as possible as long as they are well written and their sexuality is relevant to the story.
When I play a game I don't care if a character is straight or not, it's irrelevant to their purpose in the game, but if you (the devs) feel it is important I know their sexual orientation, give me a reason why it is important, don't just shove it in my face!
Her sexual orientation is completely irrelevant for the game main story or side quests.
It feels like the joke sketch of Mario with Pedro Pascal where characters just introduced themselves and shouted "I'm bissexual" for no reason.
Oh wow. Just wow. "Social engineering". I'm a bit unsure why you mention that 5% of the population non- heterosexual? Are you trying to imply that non heterosexual characters in video games or the Horizon franchise exceed 5%? Because they don't. Whether it makes sense in the context of the world? That's not at all how sexuality and attraction works. Saying that “Aloy should be focused on her job” is not a valid criticism. She's a person, not a machine that is only designed for one task.Here's the uncomfortable truth. 95+% of the population, around the globe is heterosexual. And that's no surprise, because if the human race is to continue existing, that needs to be the paradigm. So when this kind of stuff just happens to get pushed to prominence in the biggest productions of the entertainment industries, often when the property or franchise is already successful, above what is statistically normal, whether or not it actually makes sense in the context of the world (and in the context of Horizon's traditionalistic cultures and on-the-brink-of-extinction scenarios, it really doesn't), plot or characters (see the arguments about Aloy being focused on her job as the Messiah of humanity), it's a very obvious attempt at social engineering.
Are you aware that Guerrilla Studios is not located in the United States?The thing is that they literally tell you that that's what they're doing. They make entire blog posts, videos, corporate mission statements about why they're putting certain content in their games, making effort to hire people based on identity variables for the sake of bragging rights, and further influence of the content (which I think is quite ironically insulting to the groups that are being targeted there).
And who are they bragging to? The 80+% heterosexual male audience that plays Horizon? Women? Even lesbians? No, no, and not really, believe it or not.
They're bragging to special interest groups like GLAAD so that they can attract ESG investments. They're appeasing government officials who get all sorts of funding and donations to push this kind of thing. They're increasingly subsumed by a cabal of activists making the the studios inhospitable for non hyper "progressive" philosophies.
Okay, but then you don't really have an argument here. You're not actually critiquing the game on its own merits. You're saying: “It has a gay main character, therefore it's “woke and political”.
And here is the issue with that: You're setting up these insane arbitrary rules that developers must follow, and if they don't follow these rules that you've set up then it means that it's “pandering” or “ticking the boxes”.
Just look at some of the things you're suggesting here:
A character's being gay must be explored thoroughly in the main game: It can't be done in DLC.
A character being gay must mean that their sexuality is relevant to the story and a big part of the game.
Do you have the same rules for straight characters? Of course, you don't. Developers don't have to follow your arbitrary rules to justify having a character be gay. It doesn't matter if their sexuality is thoroughly explored and a big part of a characters' story arc, if it's just a mention in a conversation halfway through a game, or an optional choice at the end of a DLC campaign. Much in the same way that developers don't have to justify any of that for when the character is straight.
Whats even more amazing... is that it is A CHOICE..... you have to actively choose that optionThe fact that Metacritic user reviews are getting attention on many forums is sad and embarrassing, imagine creating a buzz out of this. I have a feeling some fans for the games do it just to increase sympathy and thus generate more positive reception for it, i just dont see why you would give these metacritic reviews your eyes and ears after constantly showing how illiterate, dumb and poorly written they are.
I'm not going to argue with you about Horizon having crappy story telling because it does. It's a Guerrilla Game. They all have terrible story telling. But what part about the storytelling doesn't make sense when it comes to Aloy's orientation? Or how does Aloy being gay/bisexual not make sense?Arbitrary rules? You mean having well crafted stories and narratives that make logical sense? If you are going to highlight someone's sexual orientation, whether they be straight or gay or bi or otherwise, you have to have it make logical sense. People criticized "straight" games for failing to do this for years.
Reality is Burning shores is poorly written mess and clearly done to hit a checkmark on a list, not because it felt natural for the character or made sense for the overarching narrative.
We have had two full games where any sort of "romance" is dismissed and hardly touched on, all of a sudden to have her fall head over heals with someone in this very short, very small expansion? You aren't an idiot, Rykan. You should be able to see why this is blatant checklist design.I'm not going to argue with you about Horizon having crappy story telling because it does. It's a Guerrilla Game. They all have terrible story telling. But what part about the storytelling doesn't make sense when it comes to Aloy's orientation? Or how does Aloy being gay/bisexual not make sense?
We very much did. For literal years. They were the crazies that were on this site before the exodus and now they plague many other locations. They act much like you in the opposite side/direction.People haven't criticized "Straight" games in any way comparable to this. I've never seen a thread on GAF that is filled with comments like "They are adding straight characters just to tick a box. They are forcing heterosexuality on us. Screw this ideology. This is social engineering".
The character that she falls for wasn't in the main games, right? The fact that they've decided to explore a romantic side to her in the DLC isn't at all evidence that this is “checklist” design, as if it's common to "turn" main characters gay in a DLC. Why would it matter if the relationship is established in a DLC or a Sequel? That's such a strange technical distinction to make.We have had two full games where any sort of "romance" is dismissed and hardly touched on, all of a sudden to have her fall head over heals with someone in this very short, very small expansion? You aren't an idiot, Rykan. You should be able to see why this is blatant checklist design.
Oh come on mate. You know that isn't true. there have been calls for more representation of minorities, including minority sexual orientations. That is VERY different from some of the comments that I referred to earlier.We very much did. For literal years. They were the crazies that were on this site before the exodus and now they plague many other locations. They act much like you in the opposite side/direction.
In over 100+ hours of games, she shows zero romantic interest in anyone. Then all of a sudden a new character comes out of nowhere and they push hard to make Aloy into a lesbian/bi character that was never once hinted at? There is a reason why people don't mind characters like Ellie in TLOU1, Emil, or Kaine, or Sylvando yet have an issue with characters like Aloy or Ellie in TLOU2. You just don't want to admit it because it is easier to dismiss anyone who is annoyed by it as a "bigot".The character that she falls for wasn't in the main games, right? The fact that they've decided to explore a romantic side to her in the DLC isn't at all evidence that this is “checklist” design, as if it's common to "turn" main characters gay in a DLC. Why would it matter if the relationship is established in a DLC or a Sequel? That's such a strange technical distinction to make.
It absolutely *is* true, so I am not sure why you are so desperate to dismiss reality.Oh come on mate. You know that isn't true. there have been calls for more representation of minorities, including minority sexual orientations. That is VERY different from some of the comments that I referred to earlier.
Way over 90% of the population are hetero and if now woman are close of being half of the gamer population has been thanks to browser and mobile gaming, a bigger market than consoles, where woman are majority.While gamers typically stayed in their own echo chamber, dev had to see the metric, it has less to do with wokeism, more to do with money
Just PS4 owner alone Girl is 40%, you are living in the 90sWay over 90% of the population are hetero and if now woman are close of being half of the gamer population has been thanks to browser and mobile gaming, a bigger market than consoles, where woman are majority.
They didn't do if because the lesbians are a huge portion of that PS market. The majority of PS players are men, and most of them should be hetero.
I said 'a majority', and 60% is a majority.Just PS4 owner alone Girl is 40%, you are living in the 90s
Just PS4 owner alone Girl is 40%, you are living in the 90s
If you take the consideration that majority of games are catered to male, that left even a bigger market void for female.
HFW an IP that is relatively new, being a story driven game but with many people complaining its story and protagonist being bad, have you wonder who made up that 10+ million sales number? Isn't it possible that many people actually like the story? Do you really think publisher are idiots that are willing to lose sales and fanbase for the sake of wokeism?
Not to mention, only one scene that is also selectable, that is not enough to make the entire game qualify as a Lesbian game.
Okay, but then you don't really have an argument here. You're not actually critiquing the game on its own merits. You're saying: “It has a gay main character, therefore it's “woke and political”.
The things is creative freedom works both ways. Western gaming media loves consider characters like Aloy as “brave” but they absolutely shit on characters like Bayonetta.I guess creative freedom only matters when it caters to internet edge lords, when it doesn’t then it is somehow PoLiTiCaL.
Pretty much. Just like difficulty and language. Give an option for woke-free experience. Also 3.8 on MC is more accurate than the ridiculously high 82.I really wish games would start putting an option to enable or disable woke agenda stuff. Let the gamers decide what they want (or not) in their playthrough.
As for this DLC, in that particular scenario, I chose the option that basically said, "I don't have time for this."
Even at that price it is still expensive for what you are getting.Again available for cheap:
EA FC Coins, Buy WoW Classic Gold, Game Key Deals
EA FC 24 Coins, Daily Game Key Deals, WoW Classic Gold and PSN Card at MMOGA. Also, buy Xbox, PSN and Steam vouchers cheap and 100% secure.www.mmoga.com
I think most straight gamers would just prefer to play as a straight protagonist because makes the character more relatable to them.
I don't think so. 11 Euro is 2 hours cinema. Here you get i don't know like 5 hours and more.Even at that price it is still expensive for what you are getting.
With the PC port of Zero Dawn out for so long, I'm sure there's plenty of rule 34 material online if you're so inclined.I'd watch her
With the PC port of Zero Dawn out for so long, I'm sure there's plenty of rule 34 material online if you're so inclined.
Finally a new melee weapon other than the spear.Shame they didn’t make her trans.
Aloy having an 16 inch robo dong would have been the best.
Yes. You absolutely need to google rule 34. Preferably image search with safe search turned off.I don't even know what rule 34 is...I feel old...I was just making a joke.
Do I just search rule 34? I'm curious.......
Uuuh they adjust movies for different regions?They are trying to turn guaranteed financial success into disappointment for woke points like Lightyear huh?
I'm still amazed they were willing to give up hundreds of millions of dollars box office receipts from not just the US but also countries like China for a 1 second kiss in the background of Lightyear. I guess Disney really does have too much money and don't know what to do with it all.
Sony should be a bit more careful, they actually do need money if they really want to fight Microsoft after Call of Duty is taken away from them.
They kept the lesbian stuff for Lightyear for all regions and refused to remove it, and that's why it was banned in many countries, including China and Middle East.Uuuh they adjust movies for different regions?
Kratos will be gay too. They will figure out someway to butcher his characterWasn't Ellie enough? Does everyone has to be gay in Sony games?
I'm gay and I'm disappointed because it's just to tick a box.
It would feel more natural to the game if she was straight since she had plenty of male suiters in both games and then they shove a lesbian interest in a short dlc that not everybody will play.