FallingEdge
Member
I've worn short shorts at the gym.
Feels good man.
Feels good man.
It's not "why don't you like me", it's "even after three children I'm still exercising." Why would she not be in gym attire showing off her body if her message was to encourage people to exercise?
As was already pointed out, she could have shown herself exercising rather than modeling her hot bod in a display of narcissistic exhibitionism. The message is "I have three kids and I'm still hot" not "I have three kids and I still have time to exercise." I can't believe people are seriously disputing this.
I think you are underestimating the power of communication through social media. People get arrested for what they post on FB these days, very much like they would get arrested for what they may say or do to people in person (in public)
Who's to say the people I approach on the street aren't also interested improving their physical shape/health?
I rarely see "women" wearing those "clothes" at my "gym." Only occasionally. You'd have to be an "idiot" to think that she had no "intention" to show off her body. In fact, the title of this very "thread" is "hot" mom rather than "exercise" mom.
I applaud her for the work she has put in to achieve that body but his post contains an element of truth.Oh.
So we're slut shaming her now.
As was already pointed out, she could have shown herself exercising rather than modeling her hot bod in a display of narcissistic exhibitionism. The message is "I have three kids and I'm still hot" not "I have three kids and I still have time to exercise." I can't believe people are seriously disputing this.
People wear that to the gym, I don't see what the big deal is.
Of course her website is a look at me exercise, she's using her fitness to sell her product. Do we get mad at Mercedes-Benz when they show some $200,000 car in a commercial?
Images like these:
with that caption would get the same kind of flak. Your body is still being shown off when you're lifting.
People workout under layers. It's true.
When you consider a sports bra a layer, yes it's true.
I'm usually one of the least-covered girls at the gym, and I'm still wearing a tank and full shorts (not booty shorts). Not to mention it's nasty having full skin contact with benches and mats that only get cleaned once in a blue moon.
Oh.
So you're slut shaming her now.
Oh come on.
In what way is he slut shaming her?
I don't see how you can assert that this is an objective fact. If you're not, I apologize for the misunderstanding. She is wearing typical fitness attire on a fitness focused page. She is not wearing a string bikini or posing in a covered nude fashion, for example.
Are all of them openly fans of a celebrity fitness? Then yeah, you have a point there.Who's to say the people I approach on the street aren't also interested improving their physical shape/health?
I hate to sound condescending and a lil' douchy myself, but I am going to go ahead and be cheeky and say that this thread has become "Do you even lift brah?" GAF vs Rest of GAF
Oh come on.
In what way is he slut shaming her?
How is this controversial at all?
She's wearing clothes that many female runners wear every day and saying she's only doing it because of "narcissistic exhibitionism".
I hate to sound condescending and a lil' douchy myself, but I am going to go ahead and be cheeky and say that this thread has become "Do you even lift brah?" GAF vs Rest of GAF
Again, this is not "typical" gym attire in my 19 years of gym-going. Some women do occasionally wear it, but I only see the booty shorts on rare occasions. One can infer intent from how one chooses to convey one's message, as is done all the time. That's how I can assert it. Why do you think this is characterized as "hot mom" instead of "exercise mom." An unfortunate misunderstanding by everyone but you?
This is every fit thread. I mean, this is already morphing into FitGAF what with the "what I did in gym today" posts.
This is every fit thread. I mean, this is already morphing into FitGAF what with the "what I did in gym today" posts.
Luckily, this is incorrect. IQs have risen significantly, and college attainment has marginally increased over time. Workers are more productive and yet work similar hours, on average, compared to the 1980s.
This is a relative comparison. In absolute terms, Americans have increased their academic achievements. Using your logic, I could say that Americans haven't grown 2.5-3'' over the last 100 years because Nordic countries have grown 4-5''.
Luckily it doesn't appear to, so it does indeed help my case.
Again, this is not "typical" gym attire in my 19 years of gym-going. Some women do occasionally wear it, but I only see the booty shorts on rare occasions. One can infer intent from how one chooses to convey one's message, as is done all the time. That's how I can assert it. Why do you think this is characterized as "hot mom" instead of "exercise mom." An unfortunate misunderstanding by everyone but you?
Again, this is not "typical" gym attire in my 19 years of gym-going. Some women do occasionally wear it, but I only see the booty shorts on rare occasions.
One can infer intent from how one chooses to convey one's message, as is done all the time. That's how I can assert it. Why do you think this is characterized as "hot mom" instead of "exercise mom." An unfortunate misunderstanding by everyone but you?
Oh.
So you're slut shaming her now.
As was already pointed out, she could have shown herself exercising rather than modeling her hot bod in a display of narcissistic exhibitionism. The message is "I have three kids and I'm still hot" not "I have three kids and I still have time to exercise." I can't believe people are seriously disputing this.
I see it all the time at my gym. Anecdotal both ways, so let's try something else.
As you can see (I even circled them for you) these are not some outlandish outfits that are limited to a select few underground workout dungeons. Feel free to go browse Amazon (Women's Clothing > Active) and you'll see the same thing.
1) She's characterized as a hot mom because she has kids and is attractive. Neither of those changes if she is in the middle of doing squats or is wearing 3 layers of clothing.
2) Again, just because you see it that way does not make it the truth. If you see it that way, fine. Just don't presume that everyone else does (or should) see it that way.
Because the two are synonymous with each other? Also why can't she both "want to encourage and motivate people to exercise" AND "be happy and proud of her success and wish to show it to the world"? There's nothing wrong here. Only if you see her body as an attack on yourself, than would you feel insecure and be angry. If you're insecure, than fix the shit your insecure with. You can't place your insecurities away from yourself in order to blame other people who aren't doing anything harmful. Take responsibility for yourself instead of focusing hate on someone else who isn't in any way doing anything bad.
Also quit fucking judging people on what they decide to wear when working out, jesus people like you are the worst. Just be you and let her be her, quit trying to bring someone down on account "well gee I just don't like what she's wearing" and move on with your life and not give a shit.
There are obviously several ways to view this image. Overall, it seems a bit like an insult to those who don't exercise, but I think that is perfectly fine.
See it as a slap in the face to people out of shape, or see it as an optimistic picture that anybody can get fit and feel better about themselves through hard work. It's up to the viewer.
Where are the booty shorts on that page? I doubt if she was wearing a sweatshirt and sweatpants anyone would have called her "hot mom.
No, it isn't fine. I mean, yeah, if she was just trying to incite debate and discussion then the picture is great. But this isn't contemporary art or political satire. Obesity is a real problem that requires a solution and the only thing this picture accomplishes is further polarizing the two sides when we need integration and understanding.
You're right, exercise and eating a healthy diet is enough for the vast majority of people. But as has been pointed out in this thread, all that takes is putting in the effort to exercise and doing some basic research into nutrition. Unless someone has evidence otherwise, I've never heard of a genetic predisposition (aside from birth defects that result in physical disability) that prevents people from performing those tasks.
It would obviously be more difficult to get in good shape AND NOT TO EXERCISE AND EAT A DECENT DIET if you are predisposed to gain weight, but as Opiate himself said, some things are harder for certain people. Does that mean it's not worth trying?