GoosTrix said:
Spacedrake, I'm really looking to purchase a machine that will give me the best possible gaming experience. I'm also looking for something that I won't need to upgrade for at least a couple of years, and will offer as much future-proofing as possible.
Good call on the BluRay playback... I'll make sure to find out if it comes with playback software. Thanks.
Don't try to future-proof. You can't. Not really. It's a waste of money and it'll only leave you frustrated, especially with the pace of improvement in the past 4-5 years (and there's no indication it'll slow down, either - if anything emerging technologies are just going to get even more crazy).
I know this probably runs counter to the attitudes of some others in this thread, but I'm of the opinion that you really should go for price-to-performance rather than massive power all at once. I'm going to quote from someone else on another forum who put it better than I ever could:
YOU CANNOT FUTURE-PROOF, don't even bother trying. Buy parts with the best price-to-performance value for your money now, and save the rest. Anything you buy today will be outclassed by what's available in 2-3 years, regardless of if you spent $1000 or $4000.
For example, if someone tried to future-proof a gaming system three years ago, they would have gotten an Athlon X2 4200, a 7950 GX2, and paid ~$3000 for all of it. Today, it would creamed by the OP's $1000 "sweet spot" system. Someone who bought midrange back then ($1000) and upgraded again to midrange two years later ($800) would have spent less money and probably would have a C2D E6750 and 8800GT; substantially faster parts that are still usable.
Ultimately, it's your money to spend as you want, but there's really a point at which "power" is just excess fluff and doesn't really enhance the experience that much.
Now, as a caveat, there
is one area where I think splurging a bit is worth it for gamers, and where I plan on dropping some benjamins when I build my next computer: solid-state drives. On load-heavy games (like FPSes or MMOs), it's seriously like the invention of the warp drive. Load times
disappear when you play from an SSD, so it can definitely be worth it to load up a nice big SSD (or even put multiple drives in or RAID-0 them together) to play your most load-intensive games from. Especially with Intel's next-gen drives coming out (which push the write-limits into "this will last as long as a comparable physical drive" territory) there's really no downside to them, aside from the price.
(EDIT: I mention this because you say you're looking for the "best experience possible", and while that machine you linked does have an SSD for a boot drive, it's only 40GB; you aren't going to be able to get much more than the OS on there. See if you can find something with a nice, fat, 80-160GB SSD (or build a machine with one :x ) and put your most load-intensive games on it. That alone will be the biggest speed boost you've ever seen.)
Still, though. I'm thoroughly in the "spend money
wisely" camp when it comes to building a PC. If you can build a $1000 PC that can do 90% of the things a $2000 PC can, why not just save yourself a thousand bucks?
Hazaro said:
The Sandy Bridge chip prices are per 1K units ($216). Usually they are priced at the same as they buy since consumers will buy an entire computer to go along with it.
$130 and $140 for the Gigabyte US3 and ASUS P67 boards. Many retailers have listed them at lose prices already.
With 4GB of DDR3 costing $50, new SSD's early next year, and the 460/560/6850 cards making appearances it's a great time to buy.
So those are confirmed prices, excellent. Definitely making the right choice on waiting for the 2x00s then. Is there a confirmed price/date for the G3 SSDs yet or are those still a nebulous "Q2 2011" deal? (I tried looking for this stuff, but for some reason you guys seem to know stuff the rest of the Internet doesn't, partially because you follow the Chinese Bothans I suspect :V )
I do hope the 560 is under $300, though. I was hoping that'd be more a refresh of the 460 the way the 6850/70s were price refreshes for their respective predecessors in the 5 line. I'd really like to pop an Nvidia in the rig I'll be building soon (partially since it'll serve as another testbed rig), but if the 560 is up near $300 I might just have to go with a 460 and save a benjamin (for diverting into pimpin' SSDs of course :V )