"I need a New PC!" 2011 Thread of reading the OP. Seriously. [Part 2]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Prophet Steve said:
It's the temperature I'm worried about. I use a Scythe Mugen 2 as CPU cooler and when I bump up the voltage I can get it to 4.3. But the temperature after some time loaded gets over 80 and I don't want that. I'm pretty sure the cooler is attached correctly so I'm thinking that I have a relatively bad CPU (I'm still pleased with the performance though).

my Mugen 2 did ~75c loaded at 4.5ghz ~1.30v (~20c ambient), ~80c at 4.7ghz with ~1.38v (2600K)

I'd say either your ambient temp is much higher or the Mugen 2 is not optimally installed (which thermal paste did you use?)
 
zulfate said:
ok cool when i get home from work i will make the changes, i was confused about that OEM thing...so ill change motherboards, windows, and the powersupply...do i need anything else?

Be sure NOT to get a H67 motherboard. You CANNOT overclock it.

Your power supply seems fine. It could go down to 600W (probably less) but it doesn't hurt to future proof (who knows what future rigs he'll be building.

Also get a gamepad.

Yes its worth spending the $35. You don't play games like Devil May Cry 4 and Darksiders on a mouse and keyboard.

Other than that seems perfect.
 
Nelo Ice said:
hows this build? still need a keyboard and theres a trick to using the windows 7 student upgrade edition on a new build right? btw didnt include a gpu since i have a gtx 460 1gb
included headphones cuz i only have $20 logitech speakers or px100s as my audio source the mic cuz i need one now that i wont be using my laptops built in webcam and the controller cuz my 360 wireless receiver broke

also have some amazon gcs lying around that i was going to use on this falls games for consoles but im going to guess theyre better used towards new headphones and pc parts lol

Ztgpql.jpg


1qRrVl.jpg


heres a direct link to the images since i fail at resizing
http://i.imgur.com/1qRrV.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Ztgpq.jpg

could i get any help on my potential build? also asked in another thread and it reminded me that i live near a microcenter so if theres any deals there that would be nice
 
n0n44m said:
my Mugen 2 did ~75c loaded at 4.5ghz ~1.30v (~20c ambient), ~80c at 4.7ghz with ~1.38v (2600K)

I'd say either your ambient temp is much higher or the Mugen 2 is not optimally installed (which thermal paste did you use?)
I used the standard thermal paste that came with the cooling, totally forgot that that could be the reason.

My CPU non-loaded is 40 degrees. Although should it automatically be lower clocked, because it always remains the same? It is possible that I messed up some settings in the BIOS.
 
n0n44m said:
set SMART fan control to disabled, that should help the fan go full speed

but still your heatsink simply isn't properly attached/installed...

Core Temp = internal cpu sensors, they got much too hot
bios cpu temp = motherboard cpu sensor which is right beneath the socket AFAIK , gets much too hot

doubt all 5(!) sensors are malfunctioning

only issue I can think of that is not heatsink-installation related would be a production fault which has caused your CPU's heatspreader to be improperly installed somehow, but that would be a first in my book

as far as damage goes, the CPU automatically throttles itself to avoid damage which is why you see the colored temperatures in Core Temp
Ok, I set the SMART fan control to disabled. The temps are still the same. What are the temps supposed to be anyways? Like 30C idle? This is insane.

BTW I'm starting to think this is all broken and I'm going to end up having to get a new CPU... If it comes to that can I just get a CPU and motherboard and reuse everything else?
 
Nelo Ice said:
hows this build? still need a keyboard and theres a trick to using the windows 7 student upgrade edition on a new build right? btw didnt include a gpu since i have a gtx 460 1gb
included headphones cuz i only have $20 logitech speakers or px100s as my audio source the mic cuz i need one now that i wont be using my laptops built in webcam and the controller cuz my 360 wireless receiver broke

also have some amazon gcs lying around that i was going to use on this falls games for consoles but im going to guess theyre better used towards new headphones and pc parts lol

Ztgpql.jpg


1qRrVl.jpg


heres a direct link to the images since i fail at resizing
http://i.imgur.com/1qRrV.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Ztgpq.jpg
Any particular reason you're going with that mobo?
 
XiaNaphryz said:
Any particular reason you're going with that mobo?

going off of the op build and hazaro said get the p67 and i just added that lol

also is microcenter having any deals on intel cpus/mobos? luckily i live by the santa clara location so im hoping i can save alot of $$ there
 
Prophet Steve said:
I used the standard thermal paste that came with the cooling, totally forgot that that could be the reason.

My CPU non-loaded is 40 degrees. Although should it automatically be lower clocked, because it always remains the same? It is possible that I messed up some settings in the BIOS.

ok I used MX-4 so that could explain a ~4c gap I guess

and yeah you want it to be going 16*100 = 1600 mhz when Idle, which usually gives temps of around 30-35 for most people

if you just use the simple overclock settings in the bios it should do that, if it doesn't you've used the advanced settings and disabled it I guess? what's your motherboard?


zazrx said:
Ok, I set the SMART fan control to disabled. The temps are still the same. What are the temps supposed to be anyways? Like 30C idle? This is insane.

BTW I'm starting to think this is all broken and I'm going to end up having to get a new CPU... If it comes to that can I just get a CPU and motherboard and reuse everything else?

Idle in windows around 30 to 40 I guess depends on the cpu, certainly not high 70s (thats 100% load for most people)

yes you can, but I doubt it is necessary ... can't recall ever reading about a system that would have 80c in bios for any reason other than a faulty heatsink (installation)

[you're not running any weird voltage/overclock settings are you?]
 
Nelo Ice said:
going off of the op build and hazaro said get the p67 and i just added that lol

also is microcenter having any deals on intel cpus/mobos?
Ah, just checking. If you want to look for something a bit cheaper, I'm sure you can find other ASUS or AsRock P67 or Z68 boards that would be fine.
 
n0n44m said:
ok I used MX-4 so that could explain a ~4c gap I guess

and yeah you want it to be going 16*100 = 1600 mhz when Idle, which usually gives temps of around 30-35 for most people

if you just use the simple overclock settings in the bios it should do that, if it doesn't you've used the advanced settings and disabled it I guess? what's your motherboard?

The MSI P67A-GD53 (B3), I think I'll reset the BIOS settings.
 
kagete said:
Ahh sweet success! It booted on the first try with zero incident. I went with an Intel 510 instead of a 320 SSD for this build, so hopefully i'm not at risk of of losing data due to the 8MB issue the 320 series have. The downside is the slightly higher cost as I could have gotten a 160 GB 320 for the price of a 120 GB 510.

Overall, the Fractal R3 is a solid 9/10, simply because I love white. White is a great color but unlike the other color options, this has a red LED for the power. They should have kept it blue to keep the look "cool". The quality is great in most areas, but in some places like the disk caddies, the quality is horrendous. The disk bays are riveted down and can't be removed without drilling/cutting plus the steel isn't rolled or sanded down so you can easily cut your fingers or hand.

Cable management is so-so, because the edge of an ATX mobo is right near the edge of the drive bays, and already partially covers some of the routing holes (which are actually very small and will not accomodate the larger power pins.

The front fan mounts and filters look like they're designed for easy installation and cleaning but are somehow missing any means of snapping in so you're forced to screw them down during installation and possibly unscrew them each time for cleaning.

Honestly, I love my matx NZXT Vulcan case much more. If the vulcan were white, or they sold a white version, I'd probably have kept it or ordered another white one. Too bad this thing is a black hole for dust, sucking and keeping everything inside the case.

Oh and regarding the Seasonic X series modular power supply, the entire package from box to PSU to included cable ties just radiates QUALITY. I was again reminded why I've always bought Seasonic and will continue to do so for all my builds, despite the price premium. That being said, some of the modular cables were about 2 inches too short to route all the way behind the mobo to keep things clean. In a smaller build the lengths would probably be perfect.

My 2500k OC is still sloppy and set to the Asrock mobo's 4.4Ghz recommended default but I'll get to locking down the voltages soon. Total build time was 6 hours including time spent chatting with GAF on mumble, dinner, and waiting for the OS to install.

IMG_20110714_215019.jpg

Lets see the inside of the white!
 
XiaNaphryz said:
Ah, just checking. If you want to look for something a bit cheaper, I'm sure you can find other ASUS or AsRock P67 or Z68 boards that would be fine.

so one of these?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...tion=asus p67&bop=And&Order=PRICE&PageSize=20

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...tion=asus z68&bop=And&Order=PRICE&PageSize=20

http://www.microcenter.com/search/search_results.phtml?Ntt=asus p67&N=0

sorry no idea what to order on anything since theres so many freaking variations of mobos and stuff ><
 
Prophet Steve said:
The MSI P67A-GD53 (B3), I think I'll reset the BIOS settings.

overclocking a 2500K should be as simple as increasing the multiplier while setting voltage to auto, then adding extra voltage with the +offset when it's not stable at a certain multiplier until you reach a speed/voltage/temp combination you're comfortable with =]
 
small_drives.jpg

SATA III SSD Round-Up: OCZ, Corsair, Patriot, Crucial
http://hothardware.com/Reviews/SATA-III-SSD-RoundUp-OCZ-Corsair-Patriot-Crucial/

We’ve opened our last few SSD round-ups with comments regarding the break-neck pace at which the solid state storage market has advanced these last few years. At the risk of repeating ourselves, the SSD market continues to show no signs of slowing down. New drives are being introduced constantly and along with updated interfaces, drivers and firmware, manufacturers continue to push the envelope.

Consider this; Solid State Drives have gone from essentially non-existent on the desktop to the preferred storage medium of enthusiasts in less than three years. And they’ve offered significant performance improvements along the way. Many would even argue (myself included) that upgrading your boot volume from a standard hard drive to an SSD will have the most significant impact on day to day computing, provided the rest of the system is up to snuff, of course.

With all of the new products to hit the market recently, we thought it was a good time to pull together a varied sampling of cutting edge SATA III solid state drives to see how they stack up. We’ve got six drives on tap for this piece, two apiece from OCZ and Corsair, one from Patriot and another from Crucial. Their main features and rated specifications are outlined in the table below, but we’ll follow up with more details and a full performance profile on the pages ahead...
 
Nelo Ice said:
could i get any help on my potential build? also asked in another thread and it reminded me that i live near a microcenter so if theres any deals there that would be nice

I would advise getting 1600Mhz RAM, some high end headphone you got there too.
 
Complistic said:
All right, I'm looking to upgrade my gtx260 to a gtx 560. I've narrowed it down to two.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130604 - $229
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130661 - $194

Basically I'm willing to spend the extra $35 IF you guys think the TI is that much better. Also the regular one is superclocked, does that mean it'll be a little more unstable than the TI or not? I'm open to all thoughts. If you think there's a better card around what I'm looking at here, by all means don't hold back.

I think this is the right thread for this.

Anyone?
 
How come a lot of hardware review sites only test the 560 and 580 cards but ignore the new 570's? I'm trying to compare the ASUS GeForce GTX 570 DirectCU II and 580 versions but nearly no where has reviewed the 570! Although, from what I've seen they are close in performance.
 
n0n44m said:
overclocking a 2500K should be as simple as increasing the multiplier while setting voltage to auto, then adding extra voltage with the +offset when it's not stable at a certain multiplier until you reach a speed/voltage/temp combination you're comfortable with =]
I don't see an offset option, already searched for it once.
 
n0n44m said:
Idle in windows around 30 to 40 I guess depends on the cpu, certainly not high 70s (thats 100% load for most people)

yes you can, but I doubt it is necessary ... can't recall ever reading about a system that would have 80c in bios for any reason other than a faulty heatsink (installation)

[you're not running any weird voltage/overclock settings are you?]

He's redone the heatsink already, and applied new thermal paste. I don't believe his temps are really that high. He's getting readings of 100c under load, and at that temperature, the computer should have shut itself off. It definitely clocks itself down, but even downclocked, the temperatures are insane. His voltage readings were fine in HWmonitor (his CPU voltage was anyway. It was misreading his 12v rail as like 1.4v or something). I guess it is worth double checking the voltages in the bios.

Time to chalk this up as a good opportunity to upgrade to Sandy Bridge? He could spend the $30 to get a Hyper 212, and re-use it on a new build if it didn't work (which I'm almost certain it's not going to, unless he really is improperly installing the heatsink over and over again).

Could the heatsink be horribly warped or something? Manufactured poorly? Something is screwy, I'm just stumped as to what.

This is rare advice from me, as I almost never tell people to touch metal components while a computer is on, but it may be worth it to do a simple feel test. If it's hotter than hell, the temps are correct. If it's cool, the temps are bogus. It definitely takes some courage to touch a heatsink that may be on top of a 100c processor though. I'd think you'd feel radiating warmth coming off a heatsink that hot anyway, so it may not even be necessary to actually touch the thing.
 
Nelo Ice said:
could i get any help on my potential build? also asked in another thread and it reminded me that i live near a microcenter so if theres any deals there that would be nice

whoa there. if you live near a microcenter its a much better deal to get your CPU + MOBO there.

I was able to get a core i3-2100 + H67 MSI mobo for $149 flat.
 
Nelo Ice said:
going off of the op build and hazaro said get the p67 and i just added that lol

also is microcenter having any deals on intel cpus/mobos? luckily i live by the santa clara location so im hoping i can save alot of $$ there
Did you try looking at their site?

51Ymf-K53BL._AA75_.jpg

$179.99 - Intel i5 2500K
http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?sku=200121

$40 additional motherboard bundle savings with purchase of a 2500K or 2600K
http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/c567eeee#/c567eeee/28


Complistic said:
Complistic said:
All right, I'm looking to upgrade my gtx260 to a gtx 560. I've narrowed it down to two.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130604 - $229
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130661 - $194

Basically I'm willing to spend the extra $35 IF you guys think the TI is that much better. Also the regular one is superclocked, does that mean it'll be a little more unstable than the TI or not? I'm open to all thoughts. If you think there's a better card around what I'm looking at here, by all means don't hold back.

I think this is the right thread for this.
Anyone?
The 560 Ti is indeed worth the difference in price. Even without getting into performance differences, that EVGA Ti has a better warranty than the non-Ti model.

Vanilla 560s are a bit of an oddity for various reasons. If you want to save money, you can pick up a standard 1GB GTX 460, with good stock cooling, and overclock it for non-Ti 560 performance.
 
LordCanti said:
He's redone the heatsink already, and applied new thermal paste. I don't believe his temps are really that high. He's getting readings of 100c under load, and at that temperature, the computer should have shut itself off. It definitely clocks itself down, but even downclocked, the temperatures are insane. His voltage readings were fine in HWmonitor (his CPU voltage was anyway. It was misreading his 12v rail as like 1.4v or something). I guess it is worth double checking the voltages in the bios.

Time to chalk this up as a good opportunity to upgrade to Sandy Bridge? He could spend the $30 to get a Hyper 212, and re-use it on a new build if it didn't work (which I'm almost certain it's not going to, unless he really is improperly installing the heatsink over and over again).

Could the heatsink be horribly warped or something? Manufactured poorly? Something is screwy, I'm just stumped as to what.

This is rare advice from me, as I almost never tell people to touch metal components while a computer is on, but it may be worth it to do a simple feel test. If it's hotter than hell, the temps are correct. If it's cool, the temps are bogus. It definitely takes some courage to touch a heatsink that may be on top of a 100c processor though. I'd think you'd feel radiating warmth coming off a heatsink that hot anyway, so it may not even be necessary to actually touch the thing.

hey I'd love to tell him to just press the heatsink down while running to see if it improves the temps but it might as well break something when not properly attached

but seriously, 4 internal sensors + external motherboard socket sensor all malfunctioning ? never seen/heard that

and touching the heatsink will not be an issue as it's probably rather cool because it's not taking up the heat properly obviously =]

hot heatsink = good heat transfer = normal cpu temp
cool heatsink = bad heat transfer = hot cpu temp


Prophet Steve said:
I don't see an offset option, already searched for it once.


hmm yeah seems the MSI don't have those ... there is something called APS but I can't really find out what it does ?

anyway you can always just try with auto voltage first, as that does allow for automatic voltage reduction at idle (which manual voltage can't do)
 
n0n44m said:
ok I used MX-4 so that could explain a ~4c gap I guess

and yeah you want it to be going 16*100 = 1600 mhz when Idle, which usually gives temps of around 30-35 for most people

if you just use the simple overclock settings in the bios it should do that, if it doesn't you've used the advanced settings and disabled it I guess? what's your motherboard?




Idle in windows around 30 to 40 I guess depends on the cpu, certainly not high 70s (thats 100% load for most people)

yes you can, but I doubt it is necessary ... can't recall ever reading about a system that would have 80c in bios for any reason other than a faulty heatsink (installation)

[you're not running any weird voltage/overclock settings are you?]
Not that I know of.. how do I know the stock settings so I can change them if they are?
 
zazrx said:
Not that I know of.. how do I know the stock settings so I can change them if they are?

go into bios and just reload default settings/factory settings/optimized defaults/whatever-they-named-it

usually there's an F* key for that as well, you should see it in some corner of the screen
 
n0n44m said:
hey I'd love to tell him to just press the heatsink down while running to see if it improves the temps but it might as well break something when not properly attached

but seriously, 4 internal sensors + external motherboard socket sensor all malfunctioning ? never seen/heard that

and touching the heatsink will not be an issue as it's probably rather cool because it's not taking up the heat properly obviously =]

hot heatsink = good heat transfer = normal cpu temp
cool heatsink = bad heat transfer = hot cpu temp





hmm yeah seems the MSI don't have those ... there is something called APS but I can't really find out what it does ?

anyway you can always just try with auto voltage first, as that does allow for automatic voltage reduction at idle (which manual voltage can't do)

I'll set the auto footage, so that should put down my ambient temperature. But seeing your comment on the other poster, my heatsink is rather cool so it's probably not installed correctly. Although it has a fan directly on top of it to cool it down, so I don't know whether the surface should be hot (non loaded).
 
Prophet Steve said:
I'll set the auto footage, so that should put down my ambient temperature. But seeing your comment on the other poster, my heatsink is rather cool so it's probably not installed correctly. Although it has a fan directly on top of it to cool it down, so I don't know whether the surface should be hot (non loaded).

no your heatsink is cool because the fan is running ;)

and the MUGEN 2 types of sinks don't feel that hot because of the many fins which give it a huge surface area of which you can only touch a small part

the stock coolers are just chunks of aluminum, they get really hot fast when you turn down/off the fan :P
 
n0n44m said:
hey I'd love to tell him to just press the heatsink down while running to see if it improves the temps but it might as well break something when not properly attached

but seriously, 4 internal sensors + external motherboard socket sensor all malfunctioning ? never seen/heard that

and touching the heatsink will not be an issue as it's probably rather cool because it's not taking up the heat properly obviously =]

hot heatsink = good heat transfer = normal cpu temp
cool heatsink = bad heat transfer = hot cpu temp





hmm yeah seems the MSI don't have those ... there is something called APS but I can't really find out what it does ?

anyway you can always just try with auto voltage first, as that does allow for automatic voltage reduction at idle (which manual voltage can't do)

Whether it's working properly or not, it's still a chunk of metal that is directly touching another chunk of metal that is supposedly 100c. It should be hot either way. I've never heard of a heatsink that just didn't work altogether when properly installed. I've heard of heatsinks that didn't work properly, but a heatsink that would let a normally cool CPU get to 100c on stock voltages and speeds?

An improperly installed heatsink would make sense, but he swears it is installed properly, and seated firmly.

I just don't know. We'll know for sure if it's the heatsinks fault if he buys a tower heatsink and the temps go back to normal. I'd love (and I'm sure Intel would love) to know what was so defective about the heatsink, if that turns out to be the case.
 
n0n44m said:
no your heatsink is cool because the fan is running ;)

and the MUGEN 2 types of sinks don't feel that hot because of the many fins which give it a huge surface area of which you can only touch a small part

the stock coolers are just chunks of aluminum, they get really hot fast when you turn down/off the fan :P
Ah ok, have changed the voltage to auto but the clock speed still remains the same. Should I reset my bios settings?

EDIT: Maybe should have said this earlier, but my speeds are never completely rounded on the nearest hundred and fluctuates a minimal amount (around 0.3 mhz). It also says the bus speed is 99.8. I see this in CPU-Z.
 
I guess I can buy the Hyper 212+ and try that but my god this thing is huge (at the store looking at it) I don't even know if this thing will fit in my case!
 
LordCanti said:
Whether it's working properly or not, it's still a chunk of metal that is directly touching another chunk of metal that is supposedly 100c. It should be hot either way. I've never heard of a heatsink that just didn't work altogether when properly installed. I've heard of heatsinks that didn't work properly, but a heatsink that would let a normally cool CPU get to 100c on stock voltages and speeds?

An improperly installed heatsink would make sense, but he swears it is installed properly, and seated firmly.

I just don't know. We'll know for sure if it's the heatsinks fault if he buys a tower heatsink and the temps go back to normal. I'd love (and I'm sure Intel would love) to know what was so defective about the heatsink, if that turns out to be the case.

well take your theory about the heatsinks base being warped ... that would reduce a large part of the contact and fill up with air (insulator) as well

same goes for a scenario in which one or more of the 4 pins doesn't apply (enough) pressure ...

actually if zazrx would be able to take off the heatsink again and photograph the imprint of the thermal paste on both the sink and the cpu I think we could determine whether there was (in)sufficient contact

and I don't know either but I've never seen all those sensors go so high because of a malfunction :p so a mechanical failure with the heatsink or its mounting hardware seems more plausible from my experience =]

edit: also the other chunk of metal is some baked sand with a sensor in it that registers 100c, with a small plate of metal glued on top of it --> doesn't take much heat in absolute (Watt) terms to heat it up to 100c while whatever on top of it stays cool if there isn't any decent contact ;)


Prophet Steve said:
Ah ok, have changed the voltage to auto but the clock speed still remains the same. Should I reset my bios settings?

EDIT: Maybe should have said this earlier, but my speeds are never completely rounded on the nearest hundred and fluctuates a minimal amount (around 0.3 mhz). It also says the bus speed is 99.8. I see this in CPU-Z.

yeah I think it's something else that doesn't allow the cpu to downclock ... it's normally one of the C*-states in bios, but I've never changed those so I don't know which one

reset bios, then check if it does downclock to 1600 without overclocking. Next up the multiplier again ;)

the small fluctuations are perfectly normal
 
n0n44m said:
well take your theory about the heatsinks base being warped ... that would reduce a large part of the contact and fill up with air (insulator) as well

same goes for a scenario in which one or more of the 4 pins doesn't apply (enough) pressure ...

actually if zazrx would be able to take off the heatsink again and photograph the imprint of the thermal paste on both the sink and the cpu I think we could determine whether there was (in)sufficient contact

and I don't know either but I've never seen all those sensors go so high because of a malfunction :p so a mechanical failure with the heatsink or its mounting hardware seems more plausible from my experience =]
That's my case to whoever asked: (sorry on phone)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811146050

I got to 212+ if anything I can return it. And sure I'll take a picture once I get home and remove it.
 
·feist· said:
Did you try looking at their site?

51Ymf-K53BL._AA75_.jpg

$179.99 - Intel i5 2500K
http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?sku=200121

$40 additional motherboard bundle savings with purchase of a 2500K or 2600K
http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/c567eeee#/c567eeee/28


The 560 Ti is indeed worth the difference in price. Even without getting into performance differences, that EVGA Ti has a better warranty than the non-Ti model.

Vanilla 560s are a bit of an oddity for various reasons. If you want to save money, you can pick up a standard 1GB GTX 460, with good stock cooling, and overclock it for non-Ti 560 performance.

bleh didnt realize it was in the ads was hoping to see an exact combo on the one of the pages thanks though
 
They usually only list exact bundle deals for AMD, like these:
http://www.microcenter.com/specials/promotions/AMDbundlePROMO.html

With the current Intel deal, you have a lot more flexibility to choose, so long as you buy a 2500K/2600K.


XiaNaphryz said:
I don't think their website links to all their ad deals/promos. At least the last time I looked I don't recall seeing them.
he second link I posted shows the 1155 motherboard bundle deal, and about all of their in store and online sale items.


zazrx said:
That's my case to whoever asked: (sorry on phone)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16811146050

I got to 212+ if anything I can return it. And sure I'll take a picture once I get home and remove it.
You may need to remove the side panel fan, but it should fit fine, otherwise.
 
n0n44m said:
yeah I think it's something else that doesn't allow the cpu to downclock ... it's normally one of the C*-states in bios, but I've never changed those so I don't know which one

reset bios, then check if it does downclock to 1600 without overclocking. Next up the multiplier again ;)

the small fluctuations are perfectly normal
Ah thank you, it now clocks down when idle, and turns down a few degrees below 40. Time to raise that multiplier slowly again. Hoping that auto voltage does a good job. The voltage does fluctuate A LOT though. But yeah, I'll probably need to use it to let it clock down.
 
Prophet Steve said:
Ah thank you, it now clocks down when idle, and turns down a few degrees below 40. Time to raise that multiplier slowly again. Hoping that auto voltage does a good job. The voltage does fluctuate A LOT though. But yeah, I'll probably need to use it to let it clock down.

if you're overclocking, it'd be nice to disable some of intel's native features like Virtualization, SpeedStep, and the like. That can give a lot of instabilities while overclocking. This gives a more stable oc. If auto-voltages aren't working out for you, set it manually.

just my .02
 
tehbible said:
if you're overclocking, it'd be nice to disable some of intel's native features like Virtualization, SpeedStep, and the like. That can give a lot of instabilities while overclocking. This gives a more stable oc. If auto-voltages aren't working out for you, set it manually.

just my .02
Thank you, I'll keep that in mind. Don't need to push it to the very limit, but I'll see if it is useful.
 
The heatsink is so damn tight it's proving difficult to take off =\ I can't make 2 of the 4 clips unclip... don't know how to take it off now lol

Ok got it, this is what it looks like:

GbcSf.jpg


SkwhJ.jpg
 
zazrx said:
The heatsink is so damn tight it's proving difficult to take off =\ I can't make 2 of the 4 clips unclip... don't know how to take it off now lol

Ok got it, this is what it looks like:

GbcSf.jpg


SkwhJ.jpg

If those pictures aren't deceiving, there is a bit too much paste on there. That doesn't account for your temperatures though, not even close. It looks like contact was being made pretty evenly, or certainly evenly enough to not cause 100c temperatures.

Did you buy a hyper 212? Clean the CPU, throw that baby on, and tell us if it fixes it.
 
My PC is pretty old (except for the graphic card, a 5770).

Right now I have a Althon 64 X2 3800+ on a A8N32 Sli Premium MB with 2GB of DDR Ram.

I'm pretty sure the 5770 is bottlenecked by the CPU and the MB, so I want to change those.

My question is; Should I wait for the AMD Bulldozer CPU (I want to stay with AMD)? I was thinking of picking up a Phenom II X4.
 
LordCanti said:
If those pictures aren't deceiving, there is a bit too much paste on there. That doesn't account for your temperatures though, not even close. It looks like contact was being made pretty evenly, or certainly evenly enough to not cause 100c temperatures.

Did you buy a hyper 212? Clean the CPU, throw that baby on, and tell us if it fixes it.
I'm watching a video on youtube on how to do this because it looks complicated. Do I have to take out my motherboard to do this so I can put something on the back of the motherboard? Holy shit
 
Prophet Steve said:
Well, I resetted me bios and started to upping my multiplier again, but it still reaches the 75 degrees on 4.2 ghz. So no luck with that.
What voltages are you using. Use HWmonitor to tell.
 
zazrx said:
I'm watching a video on youtube on how to do this because it looks complicated. Do I have to take out my motherboard to do this so I can put something on the back of the motherboard? Holy shit

If your case has a motherboard cutout, you do not need to take the mobo out. If it doesn't, you do.

Them's the breaks.
 
Prophet Steve said:
Well it's now on auto, because my motherboard doesn't allow offsets and without using auto it won't clock lower when idle. It says 1.30 now.
Is that under Prime95 load? What cooler? ~70C at 1.30V is normal unless you are using a massive cooler, >212+.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom