Nabs said:You're losing it![]()
so, so frustrating man. Seriously.
Nabs said:You're losing it![]()
MisterNoisy said:The Turbo Boost is only triggered when the system is under load, and the amount of 'boost' will vary based on how many cores are being taxed - the CPU is basically 'self-overclocking' to limits set by Intel, and the 3.4GHz speed is only really attainable when a single core is running full bore. You won't see it in the BIOS, since the system isn't under load.
TheExodu5 said:I pull out my keyboard tray more than it shows there. My head is about 3' away from my TV. It's the absolute perfect size, IMO. No need to turn my head at all, and it occupies just the right amount of my field of vision. I'm just far enough away that I don't see the pixel composition of the TV. It feels like I'm gaming on a movie screen. Once you get used to it, you can't go back. It's also much more relaxing for web browsing, since I can sit so far away from it and see so well.
SalsaShark said:To counter this, as to show that its a "it depends" situation:
been building my new rig for almost a month now, spent close to $1000. Since the beggining i was getting an annoying high pitched noise that i reported here, since then i changed the PSU two times and its still making noise, PSU noise i thought, since it also does it when its turned off (as in coil whine). I would blame my power socket or so if it wasnt for the fact that my old generic PSU wasnt making this noise. The second PSU i tried after the generic one was a thermaltake that only did the noise when the PC was on, but now this new Antec one does the noise as coil whine when the PC is turned off, and i mean REALLY loud coil whine.
Now with this new one im also getting loud strange noises from my headphones, all sounds similar to high frequency whines that a dog would hear, only i can, and its really, really loud and annoying.
I also changed the case since then, noise persists etc. Driving me fucking INSANE
Disabled all power saving settings in BIOS, nothing changes.
Ive built more PCs more than once before and never ran into trouble like this, but this is my most expensive one and ive already wasted money because of this, shit's making me real sad tbh :/ gonna send it to where i bought the mobo tomorrow and leave it there for a day for their tech guy to check it out (guess he can try using other components etc), ignoring the fact that i hate other people touching my computer, but i really dont know what else to do.
Ludovician said:So with the new cards coming out soon, I'm left a bit perplexed regarding getting a new card or not. I've been looking into the high-mid range, and I've found the HAWK mega-clocked GTX 560Ti to be a great buy, seen how the extra clock makes it damn near a GTX 570, which comes in at a rather much higher price.
Then again, there's also the 6950 that can be soft-modded to 6970, around the same price. I am equally torn between those two cards that I am between getting a card now and waiting for the next gen of cards. But then I'm thinking that there usually can be some teething problems with a new gen, and that it would be desirable to wait for the second set of cards with the 28mm tech.
Is anyone able to input on this for me? It seems that the info I've read about the Keplar's performance is a lot of misquoted sayings of "four times the performance", which I think was "four time the performance per watt for double percision", initially. So how much more powerful is it going to be in gaming terms? Will I need it? I'll be gaming at 1980x1200 - and while I am not dying to play Skyrim, it sort of has to be done if I have a gfx card during the fall (ie, don't wait for the next line of cards). There's also Witcher 2 and Shogun 2 that I know I'll also be getting, so I guess it's a matter of being able to play those games at max with 1980x1200.
You really can't go wrong. The high end this stuff nowadays is mostly for a few ridiculous titles, or for 3DVision/Eyefinity. All the cards you listed are great, and it just depends on what you want out of your system.Ludovician said:Requote.
Also, I see in OP that 500W PSU is sufficient for a single GPU - is it safe to assume this will be safe for most future GPUs, seen how power consumption is going down? Also, how can I judge the quality of PSUs? Is an "80 plus cert" indication that the PSU will be good overall?
ASUS Sabertooth or Maximus IV Gene/Extreme.Jtrizzy said:So if I wanted to buy the next step up in motherboards over the Asus in the op, which would that be? If there is no reason to, I will just get the recomended one. Also I'm seeing two intel 120 ssd's at newegg and am not sure which one to get.
mkenyon said:All the cards you listed are great, and it just depends on what you want out of your system.
Oh man, should have just waited 1 more month for Bulldozer. That thuban will perform about the same, if not slightly worse than the i3 2100 in games. You'll probably get decent performance out of it, but you certainly won't be able to put those sliders to max.ChiefKief said:So I made a purchase today mainly for BF3..
How does this look to run BF3 and maybe Skyrim and any other new games at 160%
Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair V Formula AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Gaming Motherboard with 3-Way SLI/CrossFireX Support and UEFI BIOS
GFX Card (2x): MSI N560GTX-TI Twin Frozr II/OC GeForce GTX 560 Ti (Fermi) 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition Thuban 3.3GHz, 3.7GHz Turbo 6 x 512KB L2 Cache 6MB L3 Cache Socket AM3 125W Six-Core Desktop Processor HDE00ZFBGRBOX
SSD: OCZ Vertex 3 VTX3-25SAT3-120G 2.5" 120GB SATA III MLC Internal Solid State Drive (SSD)
RAM: CORSAIR Vengeance 16GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory Model CML16GX3M4A1600C9B
I think is gonna be niiiceee, but I wanna hear from the experts
As in, do you want to put those sliders to max? Are you okay with turning a few things down and still getting good performance? Where do you draw the line on what is acceptable for you? Do you mostly play AAA graphic hogs or are those just more eye candy that you want to play in theory, but spend most of your time playing LoL?Ludovician said:How do you mean? I'm tending to lean more towards ATI - seems that the better tesselation performance would give it a tad better future-proofing. If I do get a GTX 560 Ti HAWK, it'd have to last me at least a year, easily.
mkenyon said:As in, do you want to put those sliders to max? Are you okay with turning a few things down and still getting good performance? Where do you draw the line on what is acceptable for you? Do you mostly play AAA graphic hogs or are those just more eye candy that you want to play in theory, but spend most of your time playing LoL?
There's a laptop thread somewhere on GAF, might be a link from the OP. Most folks in here (like myself) are clueless about laptop capabilities since everything is so different and proprietary.BannedEpisode said:http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0051OL8R4/?tag=neogaf0e-20
Just ordered this laptop for 599.99. Did I do okay?
I had a 20% off any laptop code so I save about 150 bucks and I get a free 360.
If I'm not mistaken the 540m is a pretty decent mobile graphics card.
mkenyon said:Oh man, should have just waited 1 more month for Bulldozer. That thuban will perform about the same, if not slightly worse than the i3 2100 in games. You'll probably get decent performance out of it, but you certainly won't be able to put those sliders to max.
SnakeSlashRO said:LordCanti, Soka, black_Vegeta
Thanks for the input! I had no idea all you needed was around 8 Ram... I was about to go hog wild for nothing. This machine I was building was going to be my weaker machine and was going to be for the house hold. I was going to build an even more powerful one with 32GB of ram and two 580 with SLI...
Im glad you guys saved me some money LOL
mkenyon said:There's a laptop thread somewhere on GAF, might be a link from the OP. Most folks in here (like myself) are clueless about laptop capabilities since everything is so different and proprietary.
Karmum said:I thought I was done with my build but perhaps not. Is it worth to jump from the i5 2500k to the i7-950 and put down $50 more? Getting suggestions from other people but I'm trying to hold my ground, keeping myself on a budget for a reason.
RS4- said:Fuck, got an offer to trade my FT02 + 6950 + $280 for a TJ07 + 570 + Full WC kit.
Tempting but I don't want an NV card lol. And for the $280 I could just keep my current PC and do the WC stuff myself.
Decisions, decisions.
Smokey said:Why not?
Flying_Phoenix said:
RAID 0 mechanical drives would be less costly, 2TB vs. 64gigs, and just as fast. That 12.7 seconds would turn into 6.35. Stupid comparison, IMO. I wonder if he even used the same RAM.Flying_Phoenix said:
That proc is really long in the tooth, it's basically 3 year old architecture and not really any faster in games than even the 955 PII X4. Most games only use 1-3 cores, so 6 is silly unless you're doing something like a linux virtual machine in the background. The core series is newer architecture than the PII series, and we're already on the second generation of the core series, sandybridge being the newest.ChiefKief said:How come it'll perform about the same?
And why wouldn't I be able to put sliders at max?
Legit questions btw.
mkenyon said:RAID 0 mechanical drives would be less costly, 2TB vs. 64gigs, and just as fast. That 12.7 seconds would turn into 6.35. Stupid comparison, IMO. I wonder if he even used the same RAM.
RS4- said:Part of the reason is just to be able to go three screens without having to SLI or something. Or six screens.
mkenyon said:RAID 0 mechanical drives would be less costly, 2TB vs. 64gigs, and just as fast. That 12.7 seconds would turn into 6.35. Stupid comparison, IMO. I wonder if he even used the same RAM.
Flying_Phoenix said:How much bigger will games get in the next 5 years?
I mean what will be the typical size of a game to download on STEAM?
He's just comparing a SSD with a typical HDD. And the drive is $75.
Karmum said:I thought I was done with my build but perhaps not. Is it worth to jump from the i5 2500k to the i7-950 and put down $50 more? Getting suggestions from other people but I'm trying to hold my ground, keeping myself on a budget for a reason.
Hawk269 said:A friend of mine built a new computer and he decided to go with an Nvidia Quadro 4000. He is doing graphics work etc. But I also noticed he payed alot for his card and since I dont know much of what these quadro cards do, what is the difference between a quad 4000 and a 580?
Looking at his specs for the card, a 580 beats it almost in everything, so just wondering why a 4000 sells for almost 700 vs 500 for a 580.
HotHamWater said:
HotHamWater said:They won't balloon suddenly, but there will be a gradual rise as always. SWTOR's beta, for example, is 30GB (give or take).
mATX vs ATXSoka said:I can't recall why, but I get the feeling you do not want the P8P67-M... I wish I knew why, I just seem to recall thinking that it's not a board you'd want.
I just bailed on the whole ssd thing for now. Seems to be a 4 or 5 second increase in load times. Not worth the extra two hundred bucks imo.Flying_Phoenix said:I'm really starting to consider to just get a HDD for games for now and wait until a can grab a 512MB SSD in two years or so for $300.
How long until the next generation of SSD? Like the jump from SATA II to SATA III?
Ellis Kim said:Hey PC GAF, I'm looking at that NewEgg wishlist for both the $600 set and the $1000 set, and I'm wondering if anyone could give me a sense of what they're capable of, exactly.
I ultimately just want a computer for 3D modeling and rendering, which I don't think will be a problem with either set, but for gaming stuff I'm wondering how far these would be pushing things. Would the $600 wishlist specs be able to run BF3 ok? Or should I try to mix and match?
My main concern is whether the i3 in the $600 set is ok, or if the i5 is any better in significant ways.
cartman414 said:You should still get one for OS and key app loading, where you'll see the biggest gains. Booting in 10-15 seconds is priceless.
Flying_Phoenix said:I already have one for my OS. A 120 GB Agility.