Copernicus said:This thread needs to be shut the fuck down.
Dark City, a bad movie?
AWWW, HELLL NAW.
VillageNinja said:All the Metropolis references in the goddam universe can't save Dark City from the double take I, Robot forces on you. Was that a great Kiefer Sutherland performance or him just slurring his fuckin lines? I don't even know, cause Will Smith just had a robot car chase inside an Asimov film.
Dead said:remember when people thought DC was better than the matrix
that was kinda funny
It owes nothing to it really (except sharing some reused sets). The script was written several years before anyone had ever even heard of "Dark City"agrajag said:I feel that The Matrix, while ultimately a better film, owes a lot to Dark City. Dark City is a good film, it's not perfect, but I like it a lot.
agrajag said:I thought the movie sucked. As far as recent Asimov adaptations, Minority Report merks it.
agrajag said:I feel that The Matrix, while ultimately a better film, owes a lot to Dark City. Dark City is a good film, it's not perfect, but I like it a lot.
Scullibundo said:More like Dark Shitty. Ultimately a better film? There isn't one facet of The Matrix that isn't better than that entire mess. I have no idea where that film got its fans.
Trojita said:I thought someone bumped an I, Robot topic by mistake instead of a Real Steel topic. WTF at no LTTP.
Technosteve said:Copernicus do you like this movie because it has androids in it?
VillageNinja said:Also, name a movie bridget monnahanana hasn't made worse by appearing in it? Think of how good Lord of War could have been, but then...
BigNastyCurve said:I don't get it. Besides the big ass Coke billboard, what other obvious product placements were there in Bladerunner?
Copernicus said:Bring The Recruit into this, and I swear....
BigNastyCurve said:Star Wars? In Bladerunner? Pray tell.
Copernicus said:This isn't the Ali thread.
BigNastyCurve said:Did you just insult Michael Mann? Cause I was readin' your post and it sounded to me like you were insulting Michael Mann.
BigNastyCurve said:Did you just insult Michael Mann? Cause I was readin' your post and it sounded to me like you were insulting Michael Mann.
BigNastyCurve said:Did you just insult Michael Mann? Cause I was readin' your post and it sounded to me like you were insulting Michael Mann.
Dude has less good movies than FFC.BigNastyCurve said:Did you just insult Michael Mann? Cause I was readin' your post and it sounded to me like you were insulting Michael Mann.
TheSeks said:No and no. But they had the same writer (Asimov) and same robotic laws by that writer.
Blackace said:Love how I, Robot gets called on this all the time.. but Back to the Future and Blade Runner did it big and are classic sci-fi flicks..
ahhh hell naw..
lethial said:I, Product Placement.
MY OLD SCHOOL CONS!Router said:I admire the director for cramming all his required product placement into that 15 second slot. Seemed like a nice "fuck you guys" to the studio.
agrajag said:I thought the movie sucked. As far as recent Asimov adaptations, Minority Report merks it.
Because the ending was awful. All they had to do was copy the book. It was literally all laid out for them, and they managed to blow it. The one good part about the entire book, and they choose to go in the complete opposite direction.crazy monkey said:I loved it the more important question is why didn't I am legend receive love ? I loved that movie.
Kenak said:Because the ending was awful. All they had to do was copy the book. It was literally all laid out for them, and they managed to blow it. The one good part about the entire book, and they choose to go in the complete opposite direction.
Once when the girl and little boy showed up, the movie went way down hill.
maharg said:Please don't sully Asimov by saying he wrote this piece of trash. It was a second rate script stamped with his name to give it cred, other than token use of and outright abuse of the three laws it had nothing to do with Asimov.