• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

I wish all controllers used AA or AAA instead of having built in batteries.

Kataploom

Gold Member
This may sound weird for many people but yes, I currently do... Or at least I wish controllers had easily swappable batteries.

I was against the idea of AA batteries before I got myself a pair of rechargeable ones for my Xbox controller, but after being able play 100% of the time wireless without having to worry about controller battery dying I feel like whenever I play with my Switch controller it's kind of a downgrade, because I don't pay attention to battery all the time, so sometimes I have to rely on cable while charging which feels less comfortable, instead of leaving a pair charging and swapping it every two days "just in case", and if I forgot to swap the batteries preemptively and the battery dies, then I just have to swap it for the other pair and continue as if nothing happened.

Really a game changer on controller autonomy comfort IMO, you probably will think it's absurd until you try it as I did.
 

s_mirage

Member
So do I. Not just controllers either. It really pisses me off when a product is big enough to use replaceable batteries, but instead has an inbuilt one that guarantees that the thing will become e-waste.
 
Last edited:
Personally i prefer rechargeable batteries, especially as it means I can still use the controller plugged in while charging with no interruptions. I hate having to switch batteries constantly.

Now that being said, if built-in rechargable batteries would last longer and maybe we're easily replaceable, then I think that would be a win win.

I am honestly done with AA and AAA batteries.
 

Techies

Member
used to think that. I had and still have plenty of eneloops. But they don't hold charge as well as they once did. Never were quite as good as akalines either.

And managing a bunch of rechargeables, in practice, doesn't live up to its perfect family image.

Meanwhile the lithium battery is superior to akaline even and the Nintendo Pro controller (at least) has enough of a battery for a nice long battery life.
If you cannot manage a few rechargeable batteries than what can you manage. Keep the flats and fully charged seperate.

It's more inconvenient finding a freed up cable not busy charging a phone than it is putting 4 battiers into a charger.
 

Three

Gold Member
Based on what??

Go look up which has less toxic metals inside, which one is far easier to recycle, and which one has a much longer lifespan.

Spoiler alert: it’s not Li-Ion.
Based on scientific studies


Li ion batteries are better for the environment.
Sure, possibly in terms of toxicity of lithium vs Ni but heavy metals aren't great either. Plus that assumes you can't recycle them and you're just letting lithium and Nickel out somewhere where living things are?

An example of Eco-indicator 99 scores for different types of batteries. Lower score means lower environmental impact:

Screenshot-20250114-033325-Chrome.jpg


Li-ion is better than everything else.
 
Last edited:

Techies

Member
Personally i prefer rechargeable batteries, especially as it means I can still use the controller plugged in while charging with no interruptions. I hate having to switch batteries constantly.

Now that being said, if built-in rechargable batteries would last longer and maybe we're easily replaceable, then I think that would be a win win.

I am honestly done with AA and AAA batteries.
Quest3 controllers last very long just with one battery in each.
 
I kinda agree with the OP in the idea that the batteries, regardless of type, should be EASILY replaceable. The dual shock 3 is a damn nightmare to take apart and put back together if you need to swap the battery out which is inevitable. I still rock the 360 controller on steam because (a) it's goated, (b) batteries swapped out easily.
 
I've always found this take absolutely crazy. Almost nothing works like that anymore. From a phone, portable gaming device, laptop, tablet etc. everything is rechargable. Why would I want to waste money on batteries when I can just plug it in and recharge up?

The only somewhat logical argument is it is more annoying if the internal battery dies, but I have literally never had that happen to me. Even then, it's not worth the hassle of batteries. I'm glad that era of swapping out batteries is long gone
 
Last edited:

Three

Gold Member
I kinda agree with the OP in the idea that the batteries, regardless of type, should be EASILY replaceable. The dual shock 3 is a damn nightmare to take apart and put back together if you need to swap the battery out which is inevitable. I still rock the 360 controller on steam because (a) it's goated, (b) batteries swapped out easily.
Yeah, the only thing I agree with the OP on is that the battery should be easily accessible on every device. Especially on a device that doesn't require and doesn't have a good IP rating (waterproof) but regular AA batteries are not the answer. They're cumbersome, have low energy density and are generally bulky. I'm still surprised that the world hasn't come up with a standardised flat Li-ion design akin to the AA battery from 1907 that can be used in the newer much flatter devices of today. Shows how shit we are at working together nowadays I guess.
 
Last edited:

ArtHands

Thinks buying more servers can fix a bad patch
Quest3 controllers last very long just with one battery in each.

One of the worst things of PSVR2 is its controllers with no AA batteries. If the PSVR2 controllers are drained, you have to stop playing and charge them

If your quest 3 controllers are drained, just swap in a new charged pair of AA batteries and continue playing
 

DoubleClutch

Gold Member
Based on scientific studies


Li ion batteries are better for the environment.
Sure, possibly in terms of toxicity of lithium vs Ni but heavy metals aren't great either. Plus that assumes you can't recycle them and you're just letting lithium and Nickel out somewhere where living things are?

An example of Eco-indicator 99 scores for different types of batteries. Lower score means lower environmental impact:

Screenshot-20250114-033325-Chrome.jpg


Li-ion is better than everything else.

Anybody can search for decades and older papers that reach all sort of conclusions in a rapidly changing, highly charged topic as electrification.

EVs are a whole different animal. We’re not using NiMH batteries to push their own weight which is heavier in all sorts of climates and temperatures that reduce their life. Cobalt and Lithium mining is some of the most environmentally unfriendly and unethical mining out there in terms of the worst offenders, but it has better applications in EVs.

We’re talking about batteries in small electronics. Eneloops are some of the least offending out there in terms of toxicity and environmental impact.
 

Pelao

Member
I bought a pack of rechargeable AA batteries and a charger to use with my Meta Quest 3 controllers and it got me thinking, I don't know what the hell I'm going to do when the batteries in my PSVR2 Sense controllers start dying.
 

tr1p1ex

Member
If you cannot manage a few rechargeable batteries than what can you manage. Keep the flats and fully charged seperate.

It's more inconvenient finding a freed up cable not busy charging a phone than it is putting 4 battiers into a charger.
...different story if its just you and 4 batteries for a controller. I had/have 50+ eneloops. And a couple kids. ;)

And all I said was it wasn't the utopia at the end as it was in the beginning. I managed for 15 years. ;)
 
Last edited:

Crayon

Member
Either is fine but both need a fix to make me really happy.

For AA's: Let me charge them in the controller. Flipping batteries in an out of chargers gets annoying. I do plenty of it.

For built-ins: Make the battery easy to access and replace. This should be such a braindead operation. Seriously. A panel with one little screw. That's all I want.
 

Three

Gold Member
Anybody can search for decades and older papers that reach all sort of conclusions in a rapidly changing, highly charged topic as electrification.
So show me some newer papers that have a lower LCA score for Nickel metal hybrids. You can even use newer LCA methodology like ReCiPe.
EVs are a whole different animal. We’re not using NiMH batteries to push their own weight which is heavier in all sorts of climates and temperatures that reduce their life. Cobalt and Lithium mining is some of the most environmentally unfriendly and unethical mining out there in terms of the worst offenders, but it has better applications in EVs.
none of the papers are EV related. Only the chart is but what you're seeing is the same effect in all LCA studies of Li-ion for any use. energy density is higher on Li Ion. Meaning you have to mine less, have to ship less, have to recycle less have to use less material especially if you dont have to make it the AA form factor. NiMH are not more environmentally friendly. If you have actual scientific studies that show otherwise I would love to read them.
We’re talking about batteries in small electronics. Eneloops are some of the least offending out there in terms of toxicity and environmental impact.
Not true. Eneloops (a precharged NiMH battery) are only good in that panasonic/sanyo charge them via solar energy but NiMH is not environmentally friendly in comparison to Li-ion.
 

ZoukGalaxy

Member
Totally agree, we should be able to put AA/AAA batteries in all our controllers and be able to buy a li-ion battery pack easily removable, like in standard Xbox controllers, if we don't want to use AA/AAA, that's really the best of both worlds.
I really hope that Europe somedays will take care of this problem like they doing it for phones batteries.
 

BlackTron

Member
OP is correct. I use AA batteries for a variety of basic items including controllers. Everything takes the same battery, and I'm never stuck with a controller with a dead battery that has to be plugged in because I can just replace them with other recharged batteries I've been using since 360.

The battery itself is a replaceable item and not a liability in my controller that boosts the price.

Wavebird and 360 are GOAT especially because 360 doesn't drop connection like the Series pad. We are lucky these controllers just took bog standard batteries.

That being said it's not like built in battery is total trash. The main benefit is that you can't have a completely dead controller because you failed to maintain other recharged batteries, but when this rarely happens I'll just fill the gap with a normal battery. It would also become difficult to keep track of your valuable rechargable batteries in controllers if they are liable to end up inside random dollar store toys.
 

tr1p1ex

Member
btw, this topic seems 12 years too late. Because, iirc, that's when all the game consoles switched over to built-in non-standard sized lithium batteries.
 
Last edited:

Mibu no ookami

Demoted Member® Pro™
I will barely buy product these days if they require batteries. The only exceptions I generally make are devices that require watch batteries but last an enormous amount of time.
 

Karak

Gold Member
Same. I do have some of the double A battery pack types as well that have a charger but ultimately I pretty much hate everything about built in batteries for controllers.
 

FreeY$L

Member
Having disposable batteries in controllers adds more fault-points to an already flimsy accessories. You risk corrosion of contact points among other things, plus, the current lineup of controllers last all generation. My Ps3 dualshocks still work, they’re beat up to hell but they still hold a full charge since 2009. Its surprising because no one is playing these old consoles anymore, so its not a knock on the dualsense if in 10 years the controllers dont work, they served their purpose in the time they were supposed to.
 

b0uncyfr0

Member
I use batteries with the series x controllers and i gotta use - I'm getting tired of swapping them every few days. Sure its not daily but its enough to annoy me, especially when I've forgotten to recharge the spare pair somewhere.
 
yes absolutely.
Get some rechargables from ikea + chargers. it's cheap and your controller will never die.
drained, you can swap and continue playing.
controller is 20-30 years old? no problem. Look at all the ps3 controllers barely holding a charge now.
You can easily get inside dualsense but good luck finding good, not crappy batt that fits in 10-20 years
IKEA batteries are said to come from the same [formerly] Sanyo (Now Panasonic) factories in Japan as Eneloop/Eneloop Pros. When you put them side-by-side, they look and feel identical
 

Zathalus

Member
Microsoft and 8bitDo have the right way. Swappable rechargeable pack that you can swap with batteries if you so wish. Microsoft should improve by including the swappable battery pack with the controller as the default, rather than making it an optional extra purchase.

This approach gives you the flexibility of both worlds, with the only negative being slightly more space needed for the swappable battery.
 
Not sure what i prefer, while the Xbox controller i have last longer before needing to charge, i also like bulit in, i just charge them every other day so no big deal either way for me.
 

dorkimoe

Member
good thing the xbox controller battery is replaceable. I always have a battery i can swap too. PS5 on the other hand, i get a nice 30 minutes of use before the stupid ass controller dies
 

Antwix

Member
I think I bought my eneloops around 2010 after the play and charge kit thing died on my 360. I've had the same eneloops since. I've had the ikea laddas for several years too which are just as good. I remember replaying a bunch of the dark souls games and sekiros last year and the batteries lasted each game without a charge. Pretty damn good after all these years.

I'm pretty indifferent when it comes to this though. With the rechargeable internal batteries, you can play and charge at the same time. But if you don't have any AAs charged, you're stuck with a wired controller. They take awhile to charge too. Pros and cons to each.
 

soulbait

Member
Because it's cool af. I like especially sony flopyp disk cameras and I love the grainy quality of photos. Different vibe.
I also have some digicamslate 90s/early 2000s that can capture nightvision pics in complete darkness. Examples below too

Just a bit of my "collection". It's few months old pic. it was meant to be only Floppy disk stuff but grew. I had to put breaks on it because I don't have room for this :p
Stuff goes from 0.3mp to 5mp
ee31i9P.jpeg

TIhVnBv.jpeg



hoYdHWn.jpeg



3m2FIXQ.jpeg



N0GU3j3.jpeg



wfvzEB7.jpeg



dZNHKhv.jpeg



LFD8NsG.jpeg



y4NAIhK.jpeg



Vxp3LMS.jpeg



NmPMPOJ.jpeg



2l2H9FJ.jpeg



DoJwDHw.jpeg



mXsfnIb.jpeg



SdnyNv4.jpeg



mWmw5gJ.jpeg



Po3Br2j.jpeg
That's not grain coming from the Sony Mavica's, but noise. Easily to reproduce digitally, because it is digital noise. Film grain is harder to reproduce well, because it is random and each strip film will be different.

However, if you like it, you like it. You do you man!
 
So I bought rechargeable AAs because of this thread. Amazon said they delivered them, but they weren't at my house 15 minutes after I got the "delivered" notice.

World's fastest pirates? Amazon slip-up?

Give your AAs an extra hug today, lads.
 

AlphaMale

Member
Another stupid thread about having physical AA/AAA batteries on a controller...

Here's my opinion. Built-in batteries are SUPERIOR in every way!
-lighter controller
-no looking for batteries, or forgetting to charge them ahead of time
-just a cable to charge, so you can just have it permanently plugged in, if you so choose
-...and the biggest lame argument for built-in batteries..."what if the battery dies, and no longer holds a charge?"...I've had countless controllers since the PS3 and *none* have died during the use of the respective console. And if the battery does die, then it's fairly easy to buy a new one on Temu or AliExpress and replace it yourself.
 
Top Bottom