IGN: Splatoon's lack of voice chat is "cheap and lazy"

I'm out of the loop, but i think its been several of months since shortages were reported on some of the Amiibos. Have they been able to restock yet?

DavidTennantlaughing.gif~c200
 
Some people on this site have defended:

- The lack of online in Mario Party 10 because "Mario Party is meant to be played locally"
- The artificial supply constraints of sought after Amiibo because "they underestimated demand"
- The fact that Amiibo functionality has basically turned into on-disc DLC because "it's minor content"
- Nintendo's Youtube creator's program because they're "protecting their IP"
- Nintendo butchering the picture of quality their legacy titles to "prevent epilepsy"
- Nintendo refusing to add GBA games to the 3DS eShop because they only offer "perfect emulation"
- Nintendo's decision not to bring the New 3DS to North America because "too many options"
- Nintendo's decision not to include a charger with the New 3DS XL because "it helps reduce environmental waste"

And many more. You're surprised by the fact that they're doing the same for Splatoon, an unfinished game that doesn't have voice chat in 2015? I consider myself to be a big Nintendo fan, but the constant excuses are embarrassing.



And now we have pedophilia accusations. Wonderful.


The defense force here are eerily equivalent to scary religious cults.
 
Even if voice chat isn't a big deal for a lot of people, the option should be there. Options are a good thing. Surely no one can argue that, right?

Yeah, about that....

I don't see how that's strange at all.
I don't like thing so I don't want thing. Having to mute people at the start of every match would get annoying fast so I'm glad it's not there. I've hated doing that so much in other games to the point where I simply stopped playing those games because of it.
I guess the only way I'd be fine with it is if they'd add a 'mute everyone at all times' button somewhere in the options menu. I'm not completely unreasonable.

Also, stop assuming. I've read every single page of this thread.

Oh and thanks for giving me something to chuckle about Neogaf. I was having a bad day so it's been fun seeing Splatoon being compared to an actual warzone.
 
Don't forget the region-lock apologists

"Just buy an Asian 3DS or Wii U. What's the problem?"

And now this thread. This kind of defending is the pits. There's just not one good argument made on why Nintendo won't allow vc in this game.
Options are evil!
Think of the children!
 
I read the article and some of this thread, and came away with just one thought: Critique of video games is really fucking odd. People tear it apart and look at specifics like it was a car or a watch or something. "Voice-chat should be there because I like how the game works with voice-chat" is circular reasoning. That's not a critique. "Other games do voice-chat" is not a critique either. Telling us if the game without it pulls off what it's trying to do...is what I want to know. And people wanting something to appeal to them...make your own games. The developers have no requirement to appeal to you. They are creating something with their own vision.

And to whoever asked what makes it a kids' game: Nintendo said so.

Yeah, i've just about given up on NeoGAF and Game Journalism now.

Not because there aren't wonderful people, but because everyone complains rather than enjoy what they have been given.

You can't moan at IGN's guy because it's his opinion, but you can moan about Nintendo's decision because their opinions are WRONG(!)


IGN is not a person.

Yeah, but still I see more complaining about this issue on Media Sites than I did for BF3's lack of it. Just seems like people have gotten worse overall.
 
Okay, I'm dumb.

I dunno, though. Splatoon feels very different for me. You can't camp, it's actually impossible to do so and you can't do a lot of the cheap stuff you may find in other games as it forces you to the tag everything with your ink and making occasional kills.

You can TOTALLY camp. It just has diminishing returns.

But If you want to push people back into their base, camping is a good way to do it.
 
When the developer doesn't want it? The thing with these conversations I think is that, you can make and justify an argument for either side, but we tend to forget that the people designing these games are doing so in a way they think would work best. Like I said earlier, you're free to not buy it or complain about the decision, but there is obviously a train of thought behind the developers actions to meet goals that they think would make a fun game.
They didn't leave voice chat out because they thought not being able to communicate with people would make the game more fun. There is no logic to that. How would not being able to talk to other people make the game MORE fun? They did it because they're behind the times and don't understand online game modes and how they should be set up yet. It's obvious by all of the glaring omissions in pretty much every online game they've made for the Wii U.
 
Splatoon's competitive prowess is not going to be based on whether or not there's voice chat in it. There's already a dedicated Splatoon forum spun-off of Smashboards that's seen almost 1500 members since it opened two weeks ago, as well as talk about clans, who were clearly prepared to deal with the situation (and would probably have other methods of chatting over whatever would be in place for the Wii U if it had it).

If Splatoon lacks any competitive promise, it will be due to the game play not being good for it and general lack of interest, not because of voice chat.
It will definately discourage and damage the chance for a competitive community to grow that's for sure.
 
They've had nearly five months to rectify the supply constraints from the first wave and I still haven't seen a Marth on store shelves since November. They claim a restock is happpening, but like everything else regarding Amiiibo, their messaging is deliberately vague so they can create panic within their fanbase. I'll believe it when I see it. I'm curious to see how well stocked the Inklings Amiibos are, considering that they have significant content locked behind.

These are figures, not new discs that can be printed in an afternoon. They have said that it takes several months from commencement of figure creation to being in store and that is completely believable, especially considering the delicacy of many of the amiibo.

Restocks have begun. Japan has seen them, Australia has seen them and Europe & the US will be seeing them soon.
 
but because everyone complains rather than enjoy what they have been given.

please bring this statement to its logical conclusion and come back to us.

"I have been given a game that is pretty mediocre. I'll enjoy it for what it is!"
"I was given a game that barely functions. I'll enjoy it for what it is!"
"I have been given a sandwich with shit on it, I'd rather enjoy it for what it is!"

Just because a game may be fun doesn't mean there isn't reason to criticize it.
 
To people saying the game should be docked points for no Voice Chat: http://uk.ign.com/articles/2011/10/24/battlefield-3-review

Did BF3 PC, a game which requires communication have Voice Chat? NOPE!

Did IGN care? NOPE!

Will IGN mention it in Splatoon's Review and dock points for it? Of Course They Will.

Anecdotal and all, but I've played BF4 up to rank 25 or so on PS4 and I can honestly only think of one or two occasions where I heard randoms using voice chat, and that was only for random mumblings.
In my experience, people on console tend to only use voice chat when playing with friends, and that using the PS or XBL OS party chat, which blocks the chat with randoms anyway.

Best solution would be enabling Wii U OS party chat, this would shut down this whole drama.
 
the game looks great, but no voice chat killed it for me really. Plus there's only 1v1 local multiplayer and the single player is probably going be be insignificant.
 
The Wii U has a headset?

I just looked that up. While there are Nintendo licensed headset there doesn't seem to be any made by Nintendo. If that doesn't tell you anything...
 
and as a parent, I would have big problems with a grown man trying to befriend my young child through online chatting. So I just nip that in the bud and make sure it doesn't happen. Sorry to call you a fucking creep, but it is what it is. In this time and age, you can't trust anyone out there and if I casted that net and you got caught, my apologies.
You and every other parent have to right to do so for the safety of their child but to call EVERYONE who tries to act friendly with a child a creep is narrow minded. Would you call Mother Theresa a creep if she came to your house upon invitation and acted friendly with your child?
 
I don't really think it's "lazy" (I mean, does it take a lot of time, effort, or money?). I think it's just the latest in a long line of boneheaded, backwards, or difficult to understand Nintendo decisions. I don't think this game is going to do well anyway so whatever.
 
The Wii U has a headset?

I just looked that up. While there are Nintendo licensed headset there doesn't seem to be any made by Nintendo. If that doesn't tell you anything...

Because how many WiiU games have voice chat in any meaningful way?

Is it 0?

It's 0.

The gamepad has a camera in it too. Don't know why, nothing uses it.
 
Did BF3 PC, a game which requires communication have Voice Chat? NOPE!

Will IGN mention it in Splatoon's Review and dock points for it? Of Course They Will.

My problem with splatoon is the lack of party chat without an external device. While that's a wii-u issue more than it is a splatoon one, there's plenty of alternatives on PC. I actually avoid built-in voice chat in favor of skype/teamspeak/mumble on pc. There's no alternative on Wii-U. It's not really a fair comparison.
 
They didn't leave voice chat out because they thought not being able to communicate with people would make the game more fun. There is no logic to that. How would not being able to talk to other people make the game MORE fun? They did it because they're behind the times and don't understand online game modes and how they should be set up yet. It's obvious by all of the glaring omissions in pretty much every online game they've made for the Wii U.

Why would a director want to make a silent movie in modern times? People not talking is no fun. No logic to it at all. The director is just behind the times.

Do you see how fucking weird that sounds? Only video-games are reviewed and critiqued like they are garage tools serving a function.
 
You can TOTALLY camp. It just has diminishing returns.

But If you want to push people back into their base, camping is a good way to do it.

I've always taken out the campers. They're incredibly easy prey since they're always in the open and there are plenty of good blind spots. Also the higher platforms have very limited movement options so they have to come down at some point.
 
I'm out of the loop, but i think its been several of months since shortages were reported on some of the Amiibos. Have they been able to restock yet?

The Amiibo shortage is a US thing only it seems. Here where I live, I can find pretty much any Amiibo online and in random brick and mortar stores. Saw full shelves of Villager and Marths.

This is really a NoA specific criticism, and not Nintendo in general.
 
Some people on this site have defended:

- The lack of online in Mario Party 10 because "Mario Party is meant to be played locally"
- The artificial supply constraints of sought after Amiibo because "they underestimated demand"
- The fact that Amiibo functionality has basically turned into on-disc DLC because "it's minor content"
- Nintendo's Youtube creator's program because they're "protecting their IP"
- Nintendo butchering the picture of quality their legacy titles to "prevent epilepsy"
- Nintendo refusing to add GBA games to the 3DS eShop because they only offer "perfect emulation"
- Nintendo's decision not to bring the New 3DS to North America because "too many options"
- Nintendo's decision not to include a charger with the New 3DS XL because "it helps reduce environmental waste"

And many more. You're surprised by the fact that they're doing the same for Splatoon, an unfinished game that doesn't have voice chat in 2015? I consider myself to be a big Nintendo fan, but the constant excuses are embarrassing.


And now we have pedophilia accusations. Wonderful.

Nintendo Nation gets pretty ridiculous wherever and whenever it mobilizes, defending company honor as if it was a duty. This post is an unfortunate reminder.
 
"Nintendo fans" is not a person.

Of course not. I always make sure to say things like "some Nintendo fans" or "people" to avoid making broad generalizations. I'm a Nintendo fan and I definitely do not give them a free pass on anything.

Neither is Nintendo.

It's still common to treat companies as a whole since their output is a reflection of them no matter the individual responsible.

Ultimately Nintendo is still responsible for the content in all games they publish. You could argue that "BUT IGN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ARTICLES THEY PUBLISH", but reviews are opinion based. It's not an apt comparison at all.
 
Splatoon's competitive prowess is not going to be based on whether or not there's voice chat in it. There's already a dedicated Splatoon forum spun-off of Smashboards that's seen almost 1500 members since it opened two weeks ago, as well as talk about clans, who were clearly prepared to deal with the situation (and would probably have other methods of chatting over whatever would be in place for the Wii U if it had it).

If Splatoon lacks any competitive promise, it will be due to the game play not being good for it and general lack of interest, not because of voice chat.

Are you saying there are competitive people going out of their way to chat with their friends in order to win?

Must suck for the members here who will play this game as "intended." Good luck.
 
please bring this statement to its logical conclusion and come back to us.

"I have been given a game that is pretty mediocre. I'll enjoy it for what it is!"
"I was given a game that barely functions. I'll enjoy it for what it is!"
"I have been given a sandwich with shit on it, I'd rather enjoy it for what it is!"

Just because a game may be fun doesn't mean there isn't reason to criticize it.
What you're doing is not criticism. It's complaining.
 
They didn't leave voice chat out because they thought not being able to communicate with people would make the game more fun. There is no logic to that. How would not being able to talk to other people make the game MORE fun? They did it because they're behind the times and don't understand online game modes and how they should be set up yet. It's obvious by all of the glaring omissions in pretty much every online game they've made for the Wii U.

Here are a couple of scenarios I can think of that have already been posted:

-Harrassment
-Whatever effect (negligeable or not) voice chat has on how smooth the experience is.
-As a design feature, they felt it unnecessary due to the amount of information on the screen and philosophy of game design they used.

etc.

The point is in creative work, you usually have a goal to bring entertainment to people. They probably thought the addition of voice chat, with whatever their design philosophy and experience was, wasn't sufficient enough to include it. The question was when it is acceptable to not include it, but I don't believe we can deem it acceptable due to our relationship with nintendo as consumers. Now you can complain about it and not buy it, but at the end of the day Nintendo is making the game so they get to decide what works or doesn't and whatever repercussions or fallout there is rests on them.
 
The Amiibo shortage is a US thing only it seems. Here where I live, I can find pretty much any Amiibo online and in random brick and mortar stores. Saw full shelves of Villager and Marths.

This is really a NoA specific criticism, and not Nintendo in general.
Understood. Hopefully there will be a restock in the US as well soon.
 
I thought dude bro shooting players didn't like Nintendo games.

Part of me thinks that a lot of people didn't play multiplayer shooters because of that whole dudebro stigma, so along comes Splatoon, something that looks different, and they see it as a way to get into it. But the more it reflects other arena shooters, the more people want to keep it different, even if that means defending the removal of basic elements because "I dunno, kids might play it, I don't want to fuddle with options in the game, muting is hard right?"

Now that statement has no evidence behind it but...I don't know. No voice chat is a weird thing to rally for.

I use it for Game'n' Wario and Wii Party U all the time. Mii Maker uses it too.

That is true, I did forget about Game'nWario.

I used the Mii Maker camera once. It generated something that didn't look remotely like me.
 
What you're doing is not criticism. It's complaining.

It's absolutely is a criticism to say a game lacks voice chat, and that it limits strategic options in a multiplayer setting due to that and that therefore it would be better with voice chat. Sorry you don't appreciate the criticism, but it indisputably is one. Next.
 
We had such an overal fun experience with splatoon over the weekend and here you all are feeding in to this mess. Splatoon does not have voice-chat what's done is done.STOP acting cry babies and wasting energy on this when its not going to change. Meanwhile I have Splatoon preorder and can't wait to have fun with the game.maybe if sales are good splatoon 2 will support voice chat

Who forced you to come to this thread then? Telling people they are acting like crybabies over a feature that has become standard for many years now isn't about us acting juvenile, it's about why Nintendo continually tries to monitor what they think consumers want. What's worse are those who constantly defend their decisions that make absolutely no sense other than refusing to ever be critical towards them.

What's so difficult in understanding giving people options is not a bad thing?
 
I also find it hilarious how so many people dickride developers like they are messiahs or something and can do no wrong.

No voice chat in a team based shooter is a terrible idea.
 
Some people on this site have defended:

- The lack of online in Mario Party 10 because "Mario Party is meant to be played locally"
- The artificial supply constraints of sought after Amiibo because "they underestimated demand"
- The fact that Amiibo functionality has basically turned into on-disc DLC because "it's minor content"
- Nintendo's Youtube creator's program because they're "protecting their IP"
- Nintendo butchering the picture of quality their legacy titles to "prevent epilepsy"
- Nintendo refusing to add GBA games to the 3DS eShop because they only offer "perfect emulation"
- Nintendo's decision not to bring the New 3DS to North America because "too many options"
- Nintendo's decision not to include a charger with the New 3DS XL because "it helps reduce environmental waste"

And many more. You're surprised by the fact that they're doing the same for Splatoon, an unfinished game that doesn't have voice chat in 2015? I consider myself to be a big Nintendo fan, but the constant excuses are embarrassing.



And now we have pedophilia accusations. Wonderful.

ding ding ding.
 
You said it: "infantry". Soldiers sure talk in open war fields since enemy can't hear them. But think about a warzone similiar to an arena. If someone hears the soldier, he's dead for sure.
Also, military isn't the only setting a shooter can have. Think about cowboys or uniques like Splatoon.
That's why voice chat is good for war simulators and bad for arena shooters

You deserve a tag for posting the most ridiculous shit I've probably read on gaf yet.
 
Neither is Nintendo.

It's still common to treat companies as a whole since their output is a reflection of them no matter the individual responsible.

Well reviews and editorials are more directly the opinion of an individual person rather than a company which outputs a physical product in which multiple parties have a defining influence.

Op-Eds in newspaper certainly don't reflect the opinion of all the staff working there or even a large number.
 
Nintendo Nation gets pretty ridiculous wherever and whenever it mobilizes, defending company honor as if it was a duty. This post is an unfortunate reminder.

I honestly think it's a bit sadder that so many people are actually bothered by the Nintendo defense force. If someone wants to make up ridiculous arguments in defense of Nintendo... So what ...
 
Some people on this site have defended:

- The lack of online in Mario Party 10 because "Mario Party is meant to be played locally"
- The artificial supply constraints of sought after Amiibo because "they underestimated demand"
- The fact that Amiibo functionality has basically turned into on-disc DLC because "it's minor content"
- Nintendo's Youtube creator's program because they're "protecting their IP"
- Nintendo butchering the picture of quality their legacy titles to "prevent epilepsy"
- Nintendo refusing to add GBA games to the 3DS eShop because they only offer "perfect emulation"
- Nintendo's decision not to bring the New 3DS to North America because "too many options"
- Nintendo's decision not to include a charger with the New 3DS XL because "it helps reduce environmental waste"

And many more. You're surprised by the fact that they're doing the same for Splatoon, an unfinished game that doesn't have voice chat in 2015? I consider myself to be a big Nintendo fan, but the constant excuses are embarrassing.

This post is too good. Nintendo makes some great games but they are stuck in the past on a lot of things.
 
I've always taken out the campers. They're incredibly easy prey since they're always in the open and there are plenty of good blind spots. Also the higher platforms have very limited movement options so they have to come down at some point.

Yeah, diminishing returns.

The one thing I noticed about snipers during the stress test was that they didn't hide in the ink more to conseal their position more often. They would just keep firing. And in Splatoon that still helps but...it sort of negates the idea of a sniper, right?

The sniper rifle is a great offensive support weapon, but it doesn't really have much of a place in Turf war.
 
Top Bottom