IGNXBOX article - Halo 2: Epilogue

Mrbob

Member
Surprised this hasn't been posted yet. SPOILERS WITHIN THE ARTICLE so don't read it if you haven't beat the game yet!

http://xbox.ign.com/articles/571/571605p1.html

I thought it was well written. The game is so fantastic it is too bad the ending leaves a bad taste in your mouth. Really the only major criticism I have for Halo 2 besides the lack of online co-op.
 
The ending was just unexpected for me. I wouldnt say it was bad. Just made me go "WTF?.......oh............ shit............WHAT AN AWESOME FUCKIN GAME!!" :)
 
PhatSaqs said:
The ending was just unexpected for me. I wouldnt say it was bad. Just made me go "WTF?.......oh............ shit............WHAT AN AWESOME FUCKIN GAME!!" :)

Yeah, that was my reaction. I agree that it could have been handled better, but man - (nearly) everything before that just rocked. It kinda redifined the term cliff-hanger.

I actually would have liked it more had the game ended sooner.
Somehow work it so that the MC's last level was the last in the game, and end with him heading back to Earth, leaving Cortana behind and not knowing what he would find. We'd have the warning from Mercy that they were going to 'finish what they had started', but it would be a real cliff-hanger then. What I think we saw was the first minute of Halo 3, and it ended up just coming off as a tease.

No biggie for me - just means there will be a Halo 3, which I'm happy about.
 
I loved the end of Halo 2. I like when i see something that i wasent expecting to see, and the halo2 ending is just that, and only makes me wish to play Halo 3 even more.
 
Let's not mince words here. Halo 2 is fantastic and one of the best first person games ever made but the ending is horrible. Actually, I wouldn't even call it an official ending. The game, just, stops. It is one of the biggest cocktease endings I've seen. Half Life 2 is pretty bad in this regard. I keep on tossing the issue around in my head trying to decide which one is worse but I haven't decided yet. Kind of ironic that the two biggest FPS games of the year also have the most disappointing, cliffhanger endings.

Here are some reader responses:

http://xbox.ign.com/articles/571/571919p1.html
 
I loved the game, but I hated the ending. That movie trailer this summer was over the top and very misleading (to put it gently). I've said my piece already and I don't need to say it again.

But I have a question:

IGN XBOX said:
Still, to leave players on the
Arc heading toward Earth
gave people the feeling that there was more game to play. And then the credits ran.

Is that really accurate? Did I miss something? I didn't think that MC was on the
Arc
.
 
Deku Tree said:
I loved the game, but I hated the ending. That movie trailer this summer was over the top and very misleading (to put it gently). I've said my piece already and I don't need to say it again.

But I have a question:



Is that really accurate? Did I miss something? I didn't think that MC was on the
Arc
.

Some people belive that
Earth is the ark while others think it's the ship the MC is on.
Much confusion and debate here - would have been nice if IGn ackowledged this rather than state it as fact.
 
Deku Tree said:
That's what I thought.

One other comment that does point to it being on Earth - in that wacky official Halo 2 flash site, there is a page with a map of Earth. Moving the targeting cursor to New Mombasa, Africa brought the (translated) message: "This is what we came for."
 
GhaleonEB said:
One other comment that does point to it being on Earth - in that wacky official Halo 2 flash site, there is a page with a map of Earth. Moving the targeting cursor to New Mombasa, Africa brought the (translated) message: "This is what we came for."

Or the fact that The Covenant went to Earth in the first place unprepared for a fight...
 
Bacon said:
Or the fact that The Covenant went to Earth in the first place unprepared for a fight...

Maybe, but that map screen lets you move the cursor around to various places, and get different messages. The one over the US says, "Sell them our merchandise." :lol

But the fact that the message "This is what we came for" is only over the one place they landed leaves me to conclude that they are in fact looking for something specific there.
 
GhaleonEB said:
But the fact that the message "This is what we came for" is only over the one place they landed leaves me to conclude that they are in fact looking for something specific there.

Also the ilovebees thing makes me think it's on earth too.
 
Some guy who wrote a response seems to know whats up:


I have to say, great article discussing the pros and cons of Halo 2! But I do have an issue with your interpretation of the story. Actually, it's more of a difference in perceptions, come to think of it. Play the last level, on any difficulty for that matter, over again. No offense, but pay closer attention then before. Who are the Forerunners? Well, ever notice how Penetant Tangent treated the humans in relation to the Covenant? Ever notice who is ALWAYS controlling the Forerunner equipment? Even more importantly, who ISN'T? Watch the leader of the Brutes in the last level. Watch how Penetant Tangent treats all the humans. Notice how it always ASSUMES the humans know what to do, know what is going to happen? Why is that? And why is Earth so damn important for the Covenant? Why wasn't it glassed in the last scene, like all the other planets the Covenant captured? Most important of all, why did the Prophet of Regret, in his intercepted communique to the other two members of th e triumverate early on in the storyline, give some kind of religious importance to Earth, expressing how the ancient texts (or whatever they called them) said no one would be there? Do you see what I'm getting at? If you get this, please write back if possible and relay that you understand. I don't want to tell you outright; it would ruin the surprise ;) But please get back to me and tell me what you think. I think the facts speak for themselves. God, what a great twist! But it's hard to grasp for some people. My little brother didn't understand either. But it makes sense :) Please get back to me if you can. Thank you so much for your time; I hope I helped some :)

Your thoughts?

I haven't had a chance to play through Halo 2 again single player since I've had so many games to play (Plus Halo 2 online!). And I won't get to it again till sometime next year most likely. So post your thoughts on what was mentioned.
 
Mrbob said:
Some guy who wrote a response seems to know whats up:




Your thoughts?

I haven't had a chance to play through Halo 2 again single player since I've had so many games to play (Plus Halo 2 online!). And I won't get to it again till sometime next year most likely. So post your thoughts on what was mentioned.

I think anyone with a brain that has played the two games pretty much assumes that the forerunners were human.
 
Yeah but his insight seems to be greater than this. If he wrote all that just to say forerunners = humans then he wasted his time. :P
 
Bacon said:
I think anyone with a brain that has played the two games pretty much assumes that the forerunners were human.

Yeah, this theory is furthered from it's Halo 1 stage, where the only indicator was 343 Guilty Spark calling the MC 'Reclaimer.' Literally, a reclaimer is, "one who brings into or returns to a suitable condition for use, as cultivation or habitation".

The key part there is 'returns'.
 
Yeah it's pretty obvious from the game that when Mercy first showed up on Earth he was shocked by the fierce human resistance and was caught with a small inadequate fleet. He had NO IDEA that Earth was the human home planet. He just figured out where the Ark was and when he jumped there BOOM he has the entire human defensive armada pounding him. Plus the fact the Brutes didn't just kill the two humans and had to get them to operate Halo also shows that the Earth and Humans have an extremely significant link to Forerunner tech that the Covenant doesn't.

Edit: Also, what a shitty, shitty, ending that was. Man.
 
I think for a cliffhanger to be acceptable, in my opinion. A MAJOR plot twist should occur at the end of the game, which makes you WANT to know the rest of the story, and makes you starved to see the resolution.

Not like in Halo where a character that is introduced in the very beginning of the game is killed, and you just see more of that God of the flood... like... thing... Talk about a shitty, SHITTY ending boss. Completely anticlimactic. At least there was a sequence after the credits rolled.
 
I am really happy with Halo 2's single-player campaign, it's on par with the originals (which is a good thing, since Halo's SP is one of my fave this gen) but also introducing many gameplay improvements. Only thing I disliked about it, is the length, it's just Bungie made it seem like it would be much longer than Halo's but it's about the same, I shouldn't be complaining though, every second was pure gold. The ending satisfied me but really really left me wanting more.

Also, did you guys read that topic on halo.bungie.org's forum? About UK Xbox magainze "XBN" talking about a Halo 3 and 4. I'm paraphrasing here but in the magazine it was along the lines of

"Halo 3: Bungie confirmed to us that Halo 3 is in production, and that you should see it sooner rather than later. Halo 4: The script for Halo 4 has already been done, but it is not known if it's for a game, book or movie."

Take it with a grain of salt, I'm not expecting anything, until Bungie officially announce Halo 3.
 
My thoughts (spoiler-tagged for those who haven't finished the game yet):


The Forerunner ship is the Ark, not Earth.

The Prophets' faith seems to be built on scraps of lore found in Forerunner ruins, interpreted in a religious context. My theory is that they uncovered contingency plans for use if the Flood ever became impossible to contain--'in such an event, the rings must be fired to sterilize the galaxy. Selected individuals will report to this transport vessel before sterilization commences. They will proceed to the world at coordinates (xxx,yyy,zzz) and repopulate it, then use it as a staging point to reclaim the remainder of the galaxy,' or something to that effect. As interpreted by the Prophets, this emergency procedure (which may have been discovered aboard the Ark itself--apparently they've had that Forerunner vessel for a long time, long enough to make it an integral part of High Charity) became an article of faith, a prophecy of a day when the impure would be destroyed and the chosen races would embark on a Great Journey to a promised land, where they'd be granted dominion over the entire galaxy. Of course, what these guys don't realize is that their 'prophecy' already happened.
 
Didnt GS say the ark could be used to set off all the other halos?, If so then the meaning of ark they are apparently embracing is as a religious artifact (like the ark of the covenant), not a vessel for salvation (noahs ark). There for the Ark would be an item, not a place, i doubt it would be the artifact mentioned in ilovebees (as that was brought to earth from elsewhere). It's probably something that remains hidden somewhere (I smell a Lost city of atlantis cliche, i hope it doesnt come to that). No doubt it'll be easy to find now that it's been activated
 
Tellaerin said:
My thoughts (spoiler-tagged for those who haven't finished the game yet):


The Forerunner ship is the Ark, not Earth.

The Prophets' faith seems to be built on scraps of lore found in Forerunner ruins, interpreted in a religious context. My theory is that they uncovered contingency plans for use if the Flood ever became impossible to contain--'in such an event, the rings must be fired to sterilize the galaxy. Selected individuals will report to this transport vessel before sterilization commences. They will proceed to the world at coordinates (xxx,yyy,zzz) and repopulate it, then use it as a staging point to reclaim the remainder of the galaxy,' or something to that effect. As interpreted by the Prophets, this emergency procedure (which may have been discovered aboard the Ark itself--apparently they've had that Forerunner vessel for a long time, long enough to make it an integral part of High Charity) became an article of faith, a prophecy of a day when the impure would be destroyed and the chosen races would embark on a Great Journey to a promised land, where they'd be granted dominion over the entire galaxy. Of course, what these guys don't realize is that their 'prophecy' already happened.

Then why did they go to Earth...twice?

Ghost said:
If so then the meaning of ark they are apparently embracing is as a religious artifact (like the ark of the covenant), not a vessel for salvation (noahs ark). There for the Ark would be an item, not a place,

At the end of 2 Arbiter asks "WHERE" someone would go to activate all the rings and 343 replies "the ark, or course".
 
Ahh i see, i was confused, then i guess it is either the ship, earth or a place on earth...or a place you can get directions to from earth....ahh hell it could be anything.
 
"The Ark" is probably the ship that the Forerunner's took to earth the first time, when they had to abandon their homeworld years ago. It's now likely buried on earth, deep below Africa somewhere. Religion and science, I believe, both tell us that human history began in northern Africa. The way the story plays out, I suspect the Forerunner's are the same as the humans. Long ago they were being over run by Flood. They found a safe, habitable planet (earth) and escaped there. They landed in Africa, and spread out from that point, creating our own history.
 
343 Guilty Spark's line at the end unquestionably indicates that the Ark (of the Covenant...hm...what the Halos do certainly does seem similar to the end of a certain Spielberg film) is located on Earth.
 
It is my understanding that Humans are not *the* forerunners but the forerunners' ark did create life on earth and was eventually responsible for the evolution of humanity, which, as a result, has a similar dna makeup to the forerunners.

There are a few things I can't really get my mind around though - have the forerunners ever fired the Halo rings to starve the flood and exterminate themselves in the process? If they did, that explains why they disappeared - and would support my theory that the Ark carried only base organic materials like amino acids and the like.. But then, how did the Flood survive?

Or, if the forerunners never fired the Halo rings, where the hell are they? Have they all been assimilated by the flood? If so, why do all flood combat forms look human or covenant parodies? In this case the forerunners are probably Humans of a long time ago in a galaxy far far away.. But, were they dumb? Why didn't they ever fire Halo? Conscience against other sentient life forms they may doom with this action?..

Anyway, like I said, I think Forerunners fired Halo, took themselves out, sent the Ark to earth.. Humanity evolved, took to space, met covenant, found halo.

YET, this does not even begin to explain how the covenant religion is so deeply embedded with forerunner symbolism like "Halo" and "The Great Journey" (reminds me of the Ark..) Maybe the flood did not use a single ark but several aimed at all habitable worlds they knew, and the covenant species and humans are both descendents of the forerunners. Don't ask me why only humans can use Halo, though..

Ok, enough thoughts for a night, head hurts..
 
Cant really be arsed to put spoiler tags inso if you dont want to see some theories, look away now (though in my mind you shouldnt be in this thread if that is true). Hopefully there arent too many spelling mistakes on my part.










There are a few things I can't really get my mind around though - have the forerunners ever fired the Halo rings to starve the flood and exterminate themselves in the process?

If you pay attention to Guilty Spark when you confront Tartarus (I would be amazed if you played the game and you missed it), he says the Forerunners as a last resort fired the Halos, bringing their "presumed" destruction.

But then, how did the Flood survive?

The Halos kill off the Floods food, all sentient life as explained by Guilty Spark and Cortana in Halo, not the flood themselves. As to why there are still alive? They may just simply live a very long life which is I guess one reason why they were considered such a threat in addition to their parasitic nature, or perhaps beings from other galaxies once in a while find the Halos and are consumed, prolonging the the Floods existence.

Anyway, like I said, I think Forerunners fired Halo, took themselves out, sent the Ark to earth.. Humanity evolved, took to space, met covenant, found halo.

Probably very likely in the general scheme of things. The Ark of course has the connotations to Noahs Ark, maybe it is somehow immune to the Halos pulse thingies allowing some survivors to relocate and begin society anew in addition to setting the Halos off.

YET, this does not even begin to explain how the covenant religion is so deeply embedded with forerunner symbolism like "Halo" and "The Great Journey" (reminds me of the Ark..) Maybe the flood did not use a single ark but several aimed at all habitable worlds they knew, and the covenant species and humans are both descendents of the forerunners. Don't ask me why only humans can use Halo, though..

Perhaps the Prophets interpreted the Forerunners as so great a being, gods even, that they simply wish to follow in their footsteps, destroying themselves and starting their journey to where ever they believe the Forerunners went in the process.

Either something like that or they are extremely stupid and naive, but Truth comes across as being a sly bastard and considering they had Guilty Spark I would be amazed for them to have so badly interprete what he was saying, especially since he has no trouble telling the Covenant that their verbiage is wrong.

As for Humans being needed? It would tie into the Ark theory in that they are Forerunner descendents, which explains why Guilty Spark and Penitent Tangent (which is a great name, showing perhaps that the forerunners showed much regret and remorse over the halos) view you as the reclaimer, and maybe why Gravemind says something along the lines of " we came here as enemies but will leave as brothers", either he knows that humans have faced the flood before somehow or he sees you as a Forerunner (which I admit is a long shot) or that he was just referring to the Human/ Covenant conflict or none of them at all :) .

The Forerunner ship is the Ark, not Earth.

The Prophets' faith seems to be built on scraps of lore found in Forerunner ruins, interpreted in a religious context. My theory is that they uncovered contingency plans for use if the Flood ever became impossible to contain--'in such an event, the rings must be fired to sterilize the galaxy. Selected individuals will report to this transport vessel before sterilization commences. They will proceed to the world at coordinates (xxx,yyy,zzz) and repopulate it, then use it as a staging point to reclaim the remainder of the galaxy,' or something to that effect. As interpreted by the Prophets, this emergency procedure (which may have been discovered aboard the Ark itself--apparently they've had that Forerunner vessel for a long time, long enough to make it an integral part of High Charity) became an article of faith, a prophecy of a day when the impure would be destroyed and the chosen races would embark on a Great Journey to a promised land, where they'd be granted dominion over the entire galaxy. Of course, what these guys don't realize is that their 'prophecy' already happened.

Then why did they go to Earth...twice?

Personally my view is helped by the books that suggest that artifacts have star charts on them leading to forerunner installions, homeworlds etc. Regret headed to Earth perhaps knowing it to be hugely significant as the Ark or not, went to New Mombassa after finding the planet to be populated to quickly get a artifact which then led him to Delta Halo as they didnt know where it was previously as Truth was well chuffed that "another sacred ring has been found!" (either that or hes lying to the Arbiter).

The Covenant learn of the Ark or just its confirmed location from Guilty Spark leading them back to Earth. Why go back to earth in the Forerunner ship? Perhaps just for their religious significance, it would surely be seen as a huge event by the Covenant. Maybe they need a huge power source to fire the Ark and duracell batteries just arent good enough?

Maybe the forerunner ship is the ark, and Earth is outside the Halos blast range and desinated a safe place to use the ark (dont belive this for a moment myself). Maybe Truth just didnt want it left in the over run High Charity where the flood could steal it, though this would imply he has decided that High Charity is a lost cause since the ship was meant to power it.

IGN said:
For those with issues, the Arbiter was not as cool as Master Chief. Bungie introduced the Arbiter as a second playable character and throughout the game, and it forced players to switch back and forth between the two. If you were willing to accept playing as the Arbiter, then the experience brought with it an interesting story, and a few neat hooks. But to leave the game as the Arbiter, not as Master Chief, was disappointing. There are very few characters as cool, macho or as generally bad-ass as Master Chief in the history of videogames. And for a character who doesn't say much in the game, that's saying something.

Perhaps it was just me, but I never really thought of MC as cool in Halo (or its sequel) and his voice came across as very forced trying to emphasise this in Halo 2, kind of like how David Hayter hasnt really been able to top his original voice acting in the MGS series. Either way I really liked the Arbiter, he seems alot more fleshed out as a character and I really felt for him when he realised he was getting screwed by Tartarus and the Prophets.

As for the ending, I thought it was a horrible way to end things, I felt the story just stopped not even bothering to bring some closure like Halo did imo but it will atleast provide a nice platform for the start of Halo3 which I guess Bngie wanted.
 
Deathcraze said:
As for the ending, I thought it was a horrible way to end things, I felt the story just stopped not even bothering to bring some closure like Halo did imo but it will atleast provide a nice platform for the start of Halo3 which I guess Bngie wanted.

I heard the voice acting for the MC in Halo 1 english version and I wasn't impressed. When I bought my XBOX in France it came with the French version and I have to say ALL voice acting on it, including the MC and Arbiter, are first class..

Finally, I thought the Arbiter was a fresh breath for the series was rather cool and had character, one that actually developed, unlike the MC who acts just like a, well, macho robot, throughout the game (or even the series) but MC is neat too..

I thought there should have been just one final MC mission in Halo 2 OR that the outro should have been 1-2 minutes longer, showing the MC doing something kickass that would bring around a (maybe literally) explosive end to the game rather than dropping it all like that..
 
Mrbob said:
Surprised this hasn't been posted yet. SPOILERS WITHIN THE ARTICLE so don't read it if you haven't beat the game yet!


...
I'll spoil it right here and now....


MASTER CHEIF DIES!! :o



There, I said it.
Enjoy your Halo 2 Christmas present.
 
The single player component of Halo 2 sucked. It was basically a rehash of Halo 1 but with a crappier story. Halo 1's story was actually pretty decent. You go from fighting a war against aliens on an alien ring, to then fighting a war against the zombie like Flood, then finally the shit hits the fan and you have a 3 way human-covenant-flood war. The ending actually has some kind of closure as the Halo ring gets destroyed and you are temporarily finished your mission (however you know that you may have won the battle but not yet won the war). To go with that "you won the battle but not the war" analogy, Halo 2's ending is more like "Let's stop the game right before the battle even begins." Halo 2's multiplayer kicks ass but the single player game is just uninteresting and disappointing. There's no coherent story arc. You play as the Master Chief who tries to save Earth and some stuff happens. Then sometimes you're a Covenant guy (note to everyone: the fact that you play as a Covenant guy is NOT a spoiler, it's a gameplay feature) who is doing some other random stuff. I felt the story in Halo 1 was much tighter and effective. Halo 2 has a really fun multiplayer but after all that hype and the years of development, the single player campaign they came up with was just very very weak.
 
Halo 2 had one of the more inscrutable plots of a non-Japanese game I've played. :) But it didn't really matter because the levels mostly kicked ass. The plot's not uninteresting, but Bungie definitely could have made it more coherent.

About the ending, I'm sure at some point Bungie made a conscious decision to break off production on Halo 2 and move on to Halo 3, and it shows a bit in the diminished scope. Microsoft may have even been involved a bit; Halo 3 finished shortly after Xenon's launch window is far more important than making Halo 2 any more robust than necessary. I bet a few lot of the unused things seen in earlier previews make it into the third game.
 
The story is not important. What matters is the gameplay, and in that respect Halo 2 delivered in spades. I read in the gamerah review that Halo 2 might be about Barbie rescuing Ken and it would still be an awesome game.


Spoilers!!!!!!!!! I'm new and don't know how to put spoiler tags.
.
.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.


The story, up until the end, is allright. The Arbiter is an interesting character, with a great voice and a very nice fatalism, more like a death wish, really. MC is cool in that all he really is an empty shell for the player to inhabit. Talks little (and has a great voice, not like in the old trailer where it sounded like a menstruating female monkey), kicks a lot of butt.

What pissed me off about the ending was the sheer cheesiness of it. Cortana and MC appear to be in love (don't make promises to a girl... oh for chrissake) and MC poses for the camera in the most heroic posture ever. Sir! Finishing this fight! Cue in the national anthem! And then it just ends there and you see the kick ass Earth battle they all but promised in the trailers and marketing campaigns. Very cynical imho.

Regarding the backstory, the only thing I have to add is that I'm pretty sure the Forerunners created the Flood. They talk about "containing" it, like you would contain an infection. It sounds as if they created it as some kind of weapon and it got out of their hands and eventually destroyed them. The names Guilty Spark and Penitent Tangent kind of point in the direction of something terrible carried out by the Forerunners, like creating the Flood. Of course, the names may point to the activation of the Halos, especially if it destroyed both them and other races. I should think Earth is indeed in the blast radius of the Halos (I think it was around 3 galactic radii) since otherwise the humans could just retreat to Earth, let the Covenant activate the rings and thus win the war.

Btw, there were only three prophets? What's that about a triumvirate?

I think Truth knows the humans are the forerunners descendants. He would have to be a moroon not to. Maybe that's the reason of the war.

What I think will happen in Halo 3- MC will die. Cue in very cheesy funeral. Sgt Johnson cries. Elites and humans will become friends and make sweet love.
.
.
.

.
.
.
..
ENS SPOILERS!!!!!!!!!
 
I heard the voice acting for the MC in Halo 1 english version and I wasn't impressed. When I bought my XBOX in France it came with the French version and I have to say ALL voice acting on it, including the MC and Arbiter, are first class..

The Elites especially sounded better in french, it was very well done. Oh how I miss the sultry tones of the french cortana!

The ending actually has some kind of closure as the Halo ring gets destroyed and you are temporarily finished your mission (however you know that you may have won the battle but not yet won the war). To go with that "you won the battle but not the war" analogy, Halo 2's ending is more like "Let's stop the game right before the battle even begins."

Very much agree, but I did enjoy the single player game very much and have nothing against it except that there was no closure. I also didnt mind the plot, and thought it was pretty well done but would have liked more elaboration oncertain aspects, mainly Gravemind and would have loved more of Penitent Tangent.

What pissed me off about the ending was the sheer cheesiness of it. Cortana and MC appear to be in love (don't make promises to a girl... oh for chrissake) and MC poses for the camera in the most heroic posture ever. Sir! Finishing this fight! Cue in the national anthem! And then it just ends there and you see the kick ass Earth battle they all but promised in the trailers and marketing campaigns. Very cynical imho.

:lol It was pretty cheese yes, doesn't help with Master Chief sounding like hes constipated.

Regarding the backstory, the only thing I have to add is that I'm pretty sure the Forerunners created the Flood. They talk about "containing" it, like you would contain an infection. It sounds as if they created it as some kind of weapon and it got out of their hands and eventually destroyed them. The names Guilty Spark and Penitent Tangent kind of point in the direction of something terrible carried out by the Forerunners, like creating the Flood. Of course, the names may point to the activation of the Halos, especially if it destroyed both them and other races. I should think Earth is indeed in the blast radius of the Halos (I think it was around 3 galactic radii) since otherwise the humans could just retreat to Earth, let the Covenant activate the rings and thus win the war.

Again I very much agree, I guess one of the confounding questions of the Halo story is why were the Flood being studied?
 
Deathcraze said:
The Elites especially sounded better in french, it was very well done. Oh how I miss the sultry tones of the french cortana!

Hehe, yeah, the French cortana definitely flirts with MC, no mistaking it.. and it's not cheesy either, imo.
 
Top Bottom