Astray
Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92297/92297b9468c1af9f041741275b22441e23ce7d02" alt="insider-gaming.com"
EXCLUSIVE - XDefiant is on Borrowed Time as Player Numbers Decline Rapidly
According to sources at Ubisoft, Ubisoft San Francisco has until the end of Season 3 of XDefiant to improve the game's bleak player numbers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e980a/e980aac1c0eef3f0dcd1f9aeda07b0c0acafc8c2" alt="insider-gaming.com"
Also The Finals.. This is why I always laugh at the idea that F2P is the panacea for GAAS games.Same as Hyperscape, these f2p games all look great for a couple of weeks then just crater.
Yeah basically anyone chasing a GaaS now is too late. People will flock to a new high production game if its free just to try it but none of them last. You have to be truly unique or a completely new genre in the GaaS space, or be a familiar genre that has transferable skills.Also The Finals.. This is why I always laugh at the idea that F2P is the panacea for GAAS games.
F2P guarantees that people will try, but it won't guarantee them staying and spending.
Same as Hyperscape, these f2p games all look great for a couple of weeks then just crater.
The issue is that there are multiple actual COD games people can play. Why would they play ersatz COD when they can just play actual COD.Been playing it this week, it's ps3 era COD technology wise. Game balance is decent. You can unlock stuff at a normal pace. All skins are locked behind insane grinds that you have to pay money for.
It's a good F2P cod game, but not much more.
Agree, they couldn't sell this today. It's cod if you don't have money for it.The issue is that there are multiple actual COD games people can play. Why would they play ersatz COD when they can just play actual COD.
That’s the problem with all these GaaS attempts for the most part, they just don’t make sense and took too long to make and hard to support.
This is why you cannot have a long development cycle on these type of games. You have to be able to churn them out every 2-3 years otherwise your gameplay will be too old and stale, and your cost of development is too high.Yeah basically anyone chasing a GaaS now is too late. People will flock to a new high production game if its free just to try it but none of them last. You have to be truly unique or a completely new genre in the GaaS space, or be a familiar genre that has transferable skills.
I'm surprised it lasted this long to be honest![]()
EXCLUSIVE - XDefiant is on Borrowed Time as Player Numbers Decline Rapidly
According to sources at Ubisoft, Ubisoft San Francisco has until the end of Season 3 of XDefiant to improve the game's bleak player numbers.insider-gaming.com
Casuals are getting destroyed by sweats of course they aren't coming backWait you mean no SBMM doesn't retain players? Shocked! Its almost like these companies get data and implement it for player retention, not so little timmy can think he's good pub stomping all day.
But it only fails because the market is booming with so many seasoned games.Good, everytime a GaaS massively fails it brings joy in my heart.
Holy shit if this is on borrowed time with these numbers, Concord is under the guillotine.
What little of XDefiant I played was actually good.
You don't need stuff to grind for a game to be good. After all, the best games back in the good old days had everything unlocked from day one and it was up to the players to make their own fun.Stopped playing Xdefiant sometime in season 1. There was nothing to grind for.