Preseznik
Member
I remember Gotham City Impostors being exactly that for me back when I couldn't afford to buy games.Agree, they couldn't sell this today. It's cod if you don't have money for it.
Except that game was actually fantastic.
I remember Gotham City Impostors being exactly that for me back when I couldn't afford to buy games.Agree, they couldn't sell this today. It's cod if you don't have money for it.
It's not like gaas is failing, this year already has some success stories (zzz, 1st descendant, wuwa etc)The one great thing about 2024 is that it will go down aa the industry defining ywar that this gaas shit and DEI pandering is not the way!
It's not, though. It's just saturated with established titles that people are already invested in. This is basically what happened to MMOs in the late 2000s when World of Warcraft was at its peak and everyone was trying to get a slice of that pie by making clones of their own. Most of those either failed or never managed to reach the lofty goals devs and publishers set for them because people would play until they got bored, then head straight back to WoW.Glad the GaaS scene is dying.
Yep, completely understand this. Chasing after things, that sense of progression is my personal idea of fun. It was exciting during the preseason and at the start of season 1, but it wore off. The movement in general wasn't as smooth as compared to MW3, so there's that too.You don't need stuff to grind for a game to be good. After all, the best games back in the good old days had everything unlocked from day one and it was up to the players to make their own fun.
This. It makes no sense for someone invested in other GAAS to switch without a game providing anything unique or leveraging a massive and well-known IP in a GAAS format. All the games failing do not provide anything unique or compelling over other alternatives.It's not, though. It's just saturated with established titles that people are already invested in. This is basically what happened to MMOs in the late 2000s when World of Warcraft was at its peak and everyone was trying to get a slice of that pie by making clones of their own. Most of those either failed or never managed to reach the lofty goals devs and publishers set for them because people would play until they got bored, then head straight back to WoW.
Going with three character sets in each faction rather than a set hero was a mistake. I get the desire to be different, but I can't think of a worse mistake in your hero shooter than not making your heroes memorable and charismatic. Apex and Overwatch got things right by putting the sort of personality into their characters that creates fans who want to see them looking their best. And then you have games like Fortnite and The First Descendant where you see your character in 3rd person, which is arguably an even stronger incentive to make your character look cool."Internally, optimism for the game has shifted primarily due to the game’s continuously declining player numbers and lack of player spending"
![]()
Who wants to spend money when the characters look like bored cosplayers? I played it a bit and had some fun, but it didn't hold me for long. There are simply far too many better options.
They've still got rainbow six. Which is a pretty decent game with great amounts of content. Quality works.Ubisoft have been chasing F2P success for years and keep failing.
Hyperscape (shutdown after 1.5 years)
Project Q (cancelled)
The Division Heartlands (cancelled)
Ghost Recon Phantoms (shutdown after 2.5 years)
Ghost Recon Frontline (Cancelled)
I don't know how much money they've pumped into all these projects but they need to stop lol.
Tie a shooter behind a terrific shooter. COD is easily top even when it's bad and people like it because there's tons to do for everyone. Glad the GaaS scene is dying. All gamers can cheer this on.
God spiderbots are such a terribly designed skill, specially considering the netcode.It initially had my interest and I enjoyed it until the cracks began to show in updates. Terrible netcode, questionable abilities(Spider Bot anyone?) and lack of real balance in weaponry..
It doesn't have a chance with CoD coming.
Funnily, I know of one RECENT Sony game that is in desperate need of 20,000 players..lol
Its like Concord cast of characters but is set at 30% of DEI."Internally, optimism for the game has shifted primarily due to the game’s continuously declining player numbers and lack of player spending"
![]()
Who wants to spend money when the characters look like bored cosplayers? I played it a bit and had some fun, but it didn't hold me for long. There are simply far too many better options.
I would say Concord characters are 1000% cooler than generic human shit.Its like Concord cast of characters but is set at 30% of DEI.
I don't understand why being a cod clone is a selling point? wouldn't i just play cod?
Times have changed man, that’s why it’s better in today’s age for games to simply offer a PvE mode so that maybe the older gamers stick around longer.After all, the best games back in the good old days had everything unlocked from day one and it was up to the players to make their own fun.
I don't understand why being a cod clone is a selling point? wouldn't i just play cod?