• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Intel Arrow Lake Core Ultra 9 7 5 - 285K reviews discussion

peish

Member
China reviewer goes first


And it is a bomba, what happened Intel?

Games and application struggled against 14900K

DDR5-9200 still have terrible 94ns latency in aida64

M_53.png
 

Silver Wattle

Gold Member
The title is confusing with "core ultra 9 7 5"
It should be 9/7/5.

And the reviews are looking even worse than Intel led us to believe.
 

winjer

Gold Member








Average-p.webp


average-fps-1920-1080.png
 
Last edited:

Superbean

Neo Member
Wow some brutal reviews. Absolutely terrible showing from Intel. Amd x3D is definitely going to hold the performance crown I guess lol
 

winjer

Gold Member
There is something really wrong with these CPUs.
They are using a process node that is much more advanced than Zen5 and despite this, it uses double the power of a 7800X3D. While gaming.
It's like going back in time, to the era of the Athlon 64 vs Pentium 4.

tgSKQJ4.png
 

SolidQ

Gold Member
Something wrong with Cinebench 2024. Because in other Cinebench 285 didn't win
That also ST perfomance
f00176035cd0bcb3a2d32eec447cbe11.png
 

Superbean

Neo Member
You know, I used to really defend hub against the accusation of being biased against AMD. But in his AMD is Zen 5 reviews he shat all over them for efficiency improvements for the same performance or 5% gains and he seems to almost be praising Intel for efficiency improvements and performance loss. It's kind of obvious that he just seems to have a dislike of AMD
 

SolidQ

Gold Member
For stock config 285K in TechPowerUp review:

Jetstream: Fail
Speedometer: Fail
GPT2 AI: Decisive win
Stable Diffusion: Decisive win
Topaz Photo AI: Fail
NLP AI: Decisive win
Image classification: Decisive win but massively outshined by 265K
RPCS3: Respectable score slightly behind 7950X and 14900K
Ryujinx: Fail
CB R24 and Blender: Decisive win
Corona: Respectable score slightly behind 9950X
Keyshot 2024: Respectable score and four seconds slower than 7950X
V-Ray: Beats 7950X but can't touch 9950X
UE5 Build Cook Release: Respectable score
Git: Fail
Visual Studio: Respectable score four seconds slower than 9950X
AV1 encoding: Decisive win
HEVC encoding: Just behind 14900K
H.264: Respectable score
MP3 encoding: Fail
MS Office: Fail
Adobe Premiere: Respectable score
Adobe After Effects: Decisive win
3DF Zephyr: Decisive win
COMSOL: Decisive win
NAMD: Decisive win
Genome analysis: Decisive win but outshined by 265K
Antivirus: Fail
Altium Designer: Almost a fail as it can't catch 14900K but otherwise doesn't look that bad compared to 9950X
Tesseract OCR: Respectable score less than 3 seconds slower than 9950X
VirtualBox: Respectable score
MySQL: Fail as it's behind 14900K quite a bit and can't catch 9950X
MongoDB 6: Decisive win
OpenJDK: Win
ASP.NET: Tie with 14900K
WinRAR: Respectable score
7-zip: Fail
AIDA64 AES: Fail
AIDA64 SHA3: Fail
Games fail everywhere except Spiderman RT: Win
Min FPS fail everywhere except Spiderman RT and Last of US: Good
(c) AT
 
Last edited:

delishcaek

Member
The fact that intel didn't even feel the need to delay this with all the instability issues reviewers and board manufacturers seemingly had baffles me. I mean there must've been someone out there telling intel reps that shit isn't good right now.
 

JohnnyFootball

GerAlt-Right. Ciriously.
In terms of baseball, this is at best a walk for Intel, meaning they got on base or could be a strikeout.

AMD did everything in their power to make this a successful launch for Intel…and they still blew it.
 

ap_puff

Member
You know, I used to really defend hub against the accusation of being biased against AMD. But in his AMD is Zen 5 reviews he shat all over them for efficiency improvements for the same performance or 5% gains and he seems to almost be praising Intel for efficiency improvements and performance loss. It's kind of obvious that he just seems to have a dislike of AMD
I think their bias is actually to be much tougher on the company that's in the lead. So they used to try to extol the virtues of AMD when they were behind in both CPU and GPU, but now that they're actually beating intel up they want to try to give intel a fighting chance. Even though their opinions are whatever, the data is not though. This is a worse showing for chiplet architecture than rdna3 was.
 
Top Bottom