Slayer-33
Liverpool-2
I wonder how can you bulk with that...
Is it more effective?
Well if you eat at the surplus that shouldn't be a problem, I mean you can eat after the workout to break the fast too.
I wonder how can you bulk with that...
Is it more effective?
How long of a fast are you shooting for?
I wonder how can you bulk with that...
Is it more effective?
Definitely easier without sugar and starch.I've found IF is fucking easy with keto, because on keto I can go super long periods without being hungry. My body might be like, hmm, food would be good at some point, but I can go hours beyond that before eating and it's fine.
.
Calorie restriction has proven to not work well for weight loss. If you're interested in losing weight fast and easy, look into starting a keto diet.
Including IF with keto and you'll likely start seeing results quicker.
I wonder how can you bulk with that...
Is it more effective?
Well, there is no harm in trying, I can workout during the period of eating.You can bulk on IF but it's tough because you have to squeeze all of your food to create a caloric surplus into a very short time period. The effects vary from person to person, but your food choices, macronutrients and lifting program will have a much greater impact on your results than meal timing.
Some people find it hard to lift in a fasted state while some people have no problem. You could also schedule your eating window around your workout time so that you're able to eat before and after but fast the rest of the day.
Well, there is no harm in trying, I can workout during the period of eating.
Any sources for the notion that calorie restriction does not result in weight loss? Perhaps you mean that it's tough to stay on a calorie restricted diet but Keto diets also rely on caloric deficits. Keto diets are great, but that does not mean that calorie reduction doesn't work. Calorie reduction is the entire basis of weight loss. Calories are units of energy measurement and fat is how our bodies store excess energy.
If you are eating healthy and working out but aren't losing weight, then you need to eat fewer calories. Whether you do it through a keto diet or standard calorie restriction will simply affect how efficiently you burn fat and what the affects are on body composition.
I tried it and wasn't really blown away by the results. But perhaps I didn't do it long enough. Also, the temptation to do cheat days every now and then was insanely high since you're always starved.
I would recommend everyone to just stash these exotic diets and stick to normal "8 meals a day" with caloric deficit. I mean, this is usually the first diet you read about and if you do it right it really is the most effective one. It's also the one that makes most sense (--> high metabolism because your body is constantly working, no need to store much fat because you constantly supply food etc.).
Agreed lol, my body would puke that all up at that rate. I could only see 8 meals a day being viable if the feedings consisted of mono mealing delicious juicy fruits.The idea of eating 8 meals a day to lose weight is pretty hilarious.
Mostly bullshit. Fasting can be good for you, but I don't think intermittent fasting is the silver bullet for weight loss. In the end, you just have to be eating fewer calories than you need.
For some people having a set time makes it easier, for others it's difficult to do.
I also really dislike the idea of skipping breakfast, it's been shown that eating more calories at the end of the day, opposed to the start results in a slower and even stalling weight loss compared to eating more at the start. I can't skip dinner though...family commitments.
Mostly bullshit. Fasting can be good for you, but I don't think intermittent fasting is the silver bullet for weight loss. In the end, you just have to be eating fewer calories than you need.
For some people having a set time makes it easier, for others it's difficult to do.
I also really dislike the idea of skipping breakfast, it's been shown that eating more calories at the end of the day, opposed to the start results in a slower and even stalling weight loss compared to eating more at the start. I can't skip dinner though...family commitments.
Mostly bullshit. Fasting can be good for you, but I don't think intermittent fasting is the silver bullet for weight loss. In the end, you just have to be eating fewer calories than you need.
For some people having a set time makes it easier, for others it's difficult to do.
I also really dislike the idea of skipping breakfast, it's been shown that eating more calories at the end of the day, opposed to the start results in a slower and even stalling weight loss compared to eating more at the start. I can't skip dinner though...family commitments.
There has to be a fat burning / better nutrient partitioning component to it because I can eat a stupid amount of food on IF and still keep my abs. I'm talking Kobiyashi style eating. It's a slower bulk but a better one.I wonder how can you bulk with that...
Is it more effective?
If you eat 8 burgers, yes. Eat 8 times a day with caloric intake of around 2000 and then watch your weight melt.The idea of eating 8 meals a day to lose weight is pretty hilarious.
It's also the one that makes most sense (--> high metabolism because your body is constantly working, no need to store much fat because you constantly supply food etc.).
It's not a myth when you got it confirmed by yourself. I've tried everything over the past 6-7 years. Keto, Intermitted Fasting, High Carb... you name it.That's a complete myth. It doesn't matter if you eat same ammount of food in one meal or spread it through the day into 5-8 meals. Your metabolism isn't furnace that needs to be supplied regularly every few hours.
The real reason why people started promoting 5-8 meals a day is because those diets were very high on sugar and suger can stay for a very short period of time in your bloodstream. Which means that you get sugar lows, start to feel hungry and need to eat more sugar.
It workedd for you because the regiment made it easier to stick it for you personally. For other people it completely destroys any chance they have for weight loss, as small sizes never make them feel "full" and thus each of those 8 meals is bigger than it should.It's not a myth when you got it confirmed by yourself. I've tried everything over the past 6-7 years. Keto, Intermitted Fasting, High Carb... you name it.
This works amazingly if you do it right. Problem is, most people don't and then complain it's not working. You got to be extremely strict. That means getting up every day early to eat. And yes, that means no long sleepovers on weekend. People who claim it doesn't work are usually the ones who follow the proper routine somehow during the week and the completely fuck it up on the weekend. I must know, it was one of them.
But hey, do whatever useless diet you guys wanna do I guess.
You got that from broscience issue 14? I read that, it's amazing.It workedd for you because the regiment made it easier to stick it for you personally. For other people it completely destroys any chance they have for weight loss, as small sizes never make them feel "full" and thus each of those 8 meals is bigger than it should.
But those are all personal preferences. Your body doesn't care at all if you eat those 8 meals at once or spread it through the day. Any advantage you got from it is all in your head. Of course, if it works then good for you. Placebo also works for many people.
I'm not sure what that is, exactly, but I suspect I've been an intermittent faster for the last decade or so.
I don't ever eat breakfast, and I eat lunch at 1pm. Then I eat dinner at 6pm and that's pretty much it. I'll sometimes snack at about 9pm but not usually. Means I eat almost all of my food between 1pm and 6pm. Feels totally natural to me - the reason I do it is because if I eat before 12pm I just feel like shit - guaranteed.
Not sure why it's called a 'fast' if it doesn't last more than a day, though. What I do is just normal eating, imo.
I've been trying out IF for the past week or so as I'm trying to get back in shape. For me it's a bit easier to just skip a meal or two daily than to try to rein in how much I eat at every meal.
Anybody here with experience doing IF? Tips/tricks/results?
Calorie restriction has proven to not work well for weight loss. If you're interested in losing weight fast and easy, look into starting a keto diet.
Including IF with keto and you'll likely start seeing results quicker.
Coffee with a little 2% milk in the morning breaks my fast, doesn't it? I'll have to stop taking it with milk. Is it over ice just as good?
![]()
![]()
![]()
receipts pls
This is completely false. You're making your body do so much more work digesting all those meals. Any benefits of fasting would vanish. Why would your body fat disappear if you're constantly eating. Body fat is stored food for your body. If you're feeding yourself, your body would have no reason to 'eat' it's stored food. There's a reason people do not starve when fasting, because it's literally getting all your daily calorie/nutrients from it's stored food resources.If you eat 8 burgers, yes. Eat 8 times a day with caloric intake of around 2000 and then watch your weight melt.
How would I do this or a combination with keto if I will be going out for drinks for the next four Fridays? How much does alcohol mess me up.
Drink it black. I stopped drinking coffee with milk years ago and haven't looked back. Now if I try coffee with even a tiny bit of milk, I find it disgusting.
However, I do sometimes crave a sweet drink and what I've found is that iced black coffee without anything added somehow tastes sweeter. I'd try that.
Do you have a link to the claim about meal timing? I havent heard about that, and I eat most of my calories before bed.
I do agree with your first point though. For me, Its just pretty easy to go a long time without eating. The hunger only gets bad towards the end of the day before my workout. Then I lift and its eating time. I dont think there's anything inherently special about IF; I think its just a lot easier for most people to simply not eat rather than meticulously measure their calorie input and macros.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756673/
http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/v39/n12/full/ijo2015138a.html
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/oby.2009.264/full (note done in mice, so it's the inverse)
https://academic.oup.com/endo/article-lookup/doi/10.1210/en.2009-0864 (again, done in nocturnal animals, so it's the inverse).
There's a ton of data out there on eating in the active phase, which helps with weights loss, and prevents weight gain associated with shift work.
http://www.cell.com/cell-metabolism/fulltext/S1550-4131(12)00189-1
This is the only study I can find on intermittent fasting, and as far as I know (could be wrong) it's not been replicated in humans. Note, it's also not about losing weight, it's about avoiding GAINING weight when on a high fat diet. There was no benefit over ad lib feeding when on a normal diet. Pretty much why it's not really relevant.
Intermittent fasting is much more about calorie restriction within a time point. You could fast for 1 day a week for a similar effect. AMPK activation, then mTOR rebound activation.
It's kinda funny how I come in here with the null hypothesis and get asked for evidence. While those who are claiming it works seem to be content with anecdotal, and even worse, personal anecdotal evidence.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3756673/
http://www.nature.com/ijo/journal/v39/n12/full/ijo2015138a.html
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1038/oby.2009.264/full (note done in mice, so it's the inverse)
https://academic.oup.com/endo/article-lookup/doi/10.1210/en.2009-0864 (again, done in nocturnal animals, so it's the inverse).
There's a ton of data out there on eating in the active phase, which helps with weights loss, and prevents weight gain associated with shift work.
http://www.cell.com/cell-metabolism/fulltext/S1550-4131(12)00189-1
This is the only study I can find on intermittent fasting, and as far as I know (could be wrong) it's not been replicated in humans. Note, it's also not about losing weight, it's about avoiding GAINING weight when on a high fat diet. There was no benefit over ad lib feeding when on a normal diet. Pretty much why it's not really relevant.
Intermittent fasting is much more about calorie restriction within a time point. You could fast for 1 day a week for a similar effect. AMPK activation, then mTOR rebound activation.
It's kinda funny how I come in here with the null hypothesis and get asked for evidence. While those who are claiming it works seem to be content with anecdotal, and even worse, personal anecdotal evidence.
![]()
![]()
![]()
receipts pls