• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Iran endorses Bush for reelection

Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting, although I'm not exactly sure what to think.

Bush Receives Endorsement From Iran




By ALI AKBAR DAREINI
Associated Press Writer

October 19, 2004, 6:33 PM EDT

TEHRAN, Iran -- The head of Iran's security council said Tuesday that the re-election of President Bush was in Tehran's best interests, despite the administration's axis of evil label, accusations that Iran harbors al-Qaida terrorists and threats of sanctions over the country's nuclear ambitions.

Historically, Democrats have harmed Iran more than Republicans, said Hasan Rowhani, head of the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's top security decision-making body.

"We haven't seen anything good from Democrats," Rowhani told state-run television in remarks that, for the first time in recent decades, saw Iran openly supporting one U.S. presidential candidate over another.

Though Iran generally does not publicly wade into U.S. presidential politics, it has a history of preferring Republicans over Democrats, who tend to press human rights issues.

"We do not desire to see Democrats take over," Rowhani said when asked if Iran was supporting Democratic Sen. John Kerry against Bush.

The Bush campaign said no thanks.

"It's not an endorsement we'll be accepting anytime soon," Bush campaign spokesman Scott Stanzel said. "Iran should stop its pursuit of nuclear weapons and if they continue in the direction they are going, then we will have to look at what additional action may need to be taken including looking to the U.N. Security Council."

Kerry, who says halting nuclear proliferation will be a priority if he becomes president, believes Bush should have done more diplomatically to curb Iran's alleged nuclear weapons ambitions. He says Iran should be offered nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes, but spent fuel should be taken back so it cannot be used to develop nuclear weapons.

"It is telling that this president has received the endorsement of member of the axis of evil," Kerry campaign spokeswoman Allison Dobson said. "But Americans deserve a president who will have a comprehensive strategy to address the potential threat of Iran's growing nuclear program."

The United States severed diplomatic relations with Iran after militants stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979 and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. Iranian clerics were crucial in determining the fate of the 1980 U.S. election when Republican Ronald Reagan won in part because Democratic incumbent Jimmy Carter was unable to secure the hostages' release.

The hostages were freed as Reagan was inaugurated.

The United States supported Iraq in the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war, but by the late 1990s, U.S.-Iranian relations were somewhat better. They plummeted again after Bush accused Iran of being part of the "axis of evil" with North Korea and prewar Iraq.

The Bush administration also accuses Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons and sheltering operatives of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaida terror network. Still, Iran was happy to see Bush destroy two big regional enemies -- the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

Iranian political analyst Mohsen Mofidi said ousting the Taliban and Saddam was the "biggest service any administration could have done for Iran."

And Bush, he said, has learned from his mistakes.

"The experience of two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the responsibility Bush had, will make it a very remote possibility for him to risk attacking a much bigger and more powerful country like Iran," he said.

Mofidi added that "Democrats usually insist on human rights and they will have more excuses to pressure Iran."

Republican and Democratic presidents have issued executive orders against Iran, with Reagan in 1987 barring Iranian crude oil and other imports, and Bill Clinton in 1995 banning U.S. trade and investment in Iran.

"We should not forget that most sanctions and economic pressures were imposed on Iran during the time of Clinton," Rowhani said. "And we should not forget that during Bush's era -- despite his hard-line and baseless rhetoric against Iran -- he didn't take, in practical terms, any dangerous action against Iran."

Bush has been reluctant to offer Iran any incentives for better U.S.-Iranian relations, but in recent days there have been signs Washington will back European economic incentives if Iran stops uranium enrichment activities.

Gholamreza Aghazadeh, head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, was quoted by state-run television Tuesday as saying Iran is interested in buying nuclear fuel from the West, but will not concede its right to the technology.

The nuclear issue has been most sensitive, and the Bush administration is threatening to press for sanctions against Iran over it. Tehran says its nuclear ambitions are peaceful, for energy purposes.

Kavoos Emami, another Iranian political analyst, praised Kerry for mentioning the need for dialogue with Iran, and said the Democrat would be better for Iran.

"Bush has insulted Iran more than any other U.S. administration. If Kerry is elected, a U.S. military attack against Iran will never happen or will be a very remote possibility," he said.
Copyright © 2004, The Associated Press
 

Alcibiades

Member
lmao, reverse pyschology is tried on every American kid by their parents by the age of 5, do they think we're stupid...
 
SO IS IT REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY WHEN RUSSIA DOES IT

CONFUSED

HELP ME INSTAPUNDIT, LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS, SINCLAIR BROADCASTING
 

Phoenix

Member
MrAngryFace said:
Us being fucked up is good for everyone!

Yep. So long as we're farting around everywhere else, Iran, NK, etc. will be able to do much of that they want to do unchecked.
 

MIMIC

Banned
First, a group from al-Qaeda supported Bush, and now Iran?

Kerry needs to rape the shit out of this story.
 

Phoenix

Member
MIMIC said:
First, a group from al-Qaeda supported Bush, and now Iran?

Kerry needs to rape the shit out of this story.


The Kerry campaign lacks the ability to use obvious ammunition against the Bush campaign. So so much good stuff has gone unused - both IN the debates, and after them.
 

iapetus

Scary Euro Man
Maybe that's down to some final twitching vestiges of integrity in the Kerry campaign?

Nah, just kidding. Incompetents, the lot of them.
 

Mandark

Small balls, big fun!
"If it's worth winning, it's worth cheating for." - WC Fields

"If you're not cheating, you're not trying." - Los Guerreros
 
Drinky Crow said:
SO IS IT REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY WHEN RUSSIA DOES IT

CONFUSED

HELP ME INSTAPUNDIT, LITTLE GREEN FOOTBALLS, SINCLAIR BROADCASTING

IS RUSSIA A TERRORIST SYMPATHIZING STATE LIKE IRAN?? NO?

LOLOLOLOL

OMG I THINK WE HAVE A WINNAR
 

Saturnman

Banned
Of course. Iran got weapons from the Reagan administration and Cheney under Halliburton did everything he could to do trade with Iran at the very edge of legality.
 
Saturnman said:
Of course. Iran got weapons from the Reagan administration and Cheney under Halliburton did everything he could to do trade with Iran at the very edge of legality.

Might want to double check one of them facts you got there.
 

Saturnman

Banned
ManDudeChild said:
Might want to double check one of them facts you got there.

How about you verify something you know nothing about before you hit the reply button?

But funding of anti-Communist rebels in Nicaragua would lead to the worst scandal of his administration. The secret and rogue operation, under the direction of the National Security Council's Oliver North, used the proceeds from weapon sales to Iran to fund the anti-communist Contras in Nicaragua -- despite a congressional ban on such funding.

http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/reagan.years/whitehouse/iran.html

In fact, U.S. law does ban virtually all commerce with the rogue nations, but there's a loophole that G.E., Conoco-Phillips and Halliburton have exploited: The law does not apply to any foreign or offshore subsidiary so long as it is run by non-Americans.

“These three companies, as far as we were concerned, appear to have violated the spirit of the law,” says Thompson. “In the case of Halliburton, as an example, they have an offshore subsidiary in the Cayman Islands. That subsidiary is doing business with Iran.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/22/60minutes/main595214.shtml

The second fact is more obscure and recently discovered, but the Iran-Contra scandal is over 15 years old. What do they teach you in history class?
 

MIMIC

Banned
Phoenix said:
The Kerry campaign lacks the ability to use obvious ammunition against the Bush campaign. So so much good stuff has gone unused - both IN the debates, and after them.

That really pisses me off.

I wish I was his fucking campaign manager. I'd have Bush in handcuffs by now. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom