SquiddyCracker
Banned
Anything that might give someone an epileptic seizure or anything that is NSFW is not okay to post.
It's all about common sense really, just pretend that you're interacting with strangers in the public.
-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Is GAF too strict?
- Thread starter Kraftwerk
- Start date
- Status
Anything that might give someone an epileptic seizure or anything that is NSFW is not okay to post.
It's all about common sense really, just pretend that you're interacting with strangers in the public.
Because you set the posts per page to 50.
D
Deleted member 81567
Unconfirmed Member
Can someone make Copernicus a mod?
Natalie Portman is history's greatest monster
AlimNassor
Banned
If gafs banning rules more lenient, I'd say this site was very unstrict. I notice on Gaf you can get away with a lot more. On gamefaqs at least, even though moderation's are a slap on the wrist, it's still stupidly strict and the mods treat the userbase like kids. The rules are so strict like that.
A Pretty Panda
fuckin' called it, man
What has she done to you, huh?
A Pretty Panda
fuckin' called it, man
Oh really.
And why is that?
And why is that?
Takamura-San
Member
Tipping and Circumcision.
Broder Salsa
Banned
It's just one of his mood swings, typically caused by his menstruation cycle starting again.
I didn't know Panda has a menstruation cycle
Psychological Intellect
Banned
how did blamespace get un-permabanned before this current ban?
A Pretty Panda
fuckin' called it, man
G-Fex is my favorite GAF celeb/personality.
I found my VP.
I hate you so much
A Pretty Panda
fuckin' called it, man
The people have spoken Mumei.
Unless you want to pull some Ron Paul esque hijinx you known what needs to be done.
I know. I'm sorry.
Ban one of us.
Hell ban me, I don't care, as long as I'm away. Maybe it's better off that way.
A Pretty Panda
fuckin' called it, man
Thank you for the warning.
Freezie KO
Banned
Banned for disagreeing on a political issue?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=41905252&postcount=81
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=41905252&postcount=81
Freezie KO
Banned
Okay. Glad to see. That's why I asked.
I'm an expert
Formerly worldrevolution. The only reason I am nice to anyone else is to avoid being banned.
Isn't that Shakira sex tape thread the exact same thing? >.>
Not that I approve of locking these threads. =/
Not that I approve of locking these threads. =/
bafflewaffle
Member
What is wrong with refraining from calling a woman a bitch? Its called having good manners and being well spoken and comporting yourself with some decency. Please do not call me a bitch, I will not bark at your call, and I do not defecate in the grass. I deserve courtesy and dignity. All these people protesting to slander all women with the b word will still cry their eyes out when their precious mommy dies. I am left nonplussed at such spiritual torpor, such obdurateness.
Would it be permissible to inquire about the length, size, girth, thrusting capacity et al of MSSRS. Miyamoto, David Jaffe, Peter Moore or Kaz Hirai's cock in threads about them as a form of social protest for gender equality?
Would it be permissible to inquire about the length, size, girth, thrusting capacity et al of MSSRS. Miyamoto, David Jaffe, Peter Moore or Kaz Hirai's cock in threads about them as a form of social protest for gender equality?
Judging from the description I have just read, I would say no.
how about gaffers refering to heterosexual people as 'breeders' on neogaf? It has an animalistic feel that I honestly dislike.
i mean just like here
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=38103687&postcount=123
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=19615113&postcount=289
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=14480391&postcount=33
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=122679
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=2924915&postcount=19
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=248157&postcount=33
Trent Strong
Banned
I call dudes "dicks".
Had never heard of it, sounds like something out of Blade, cool.
"Breeders" is basically a derogatory term that some gay people use to refer to straight people. shuri's post actually had me checking just now to see if I had been guilty of it in the past.
BadAss2961
Member
lol, breeders. Didn't know that gays had a slur for straight people.
Ironically, breeding is also used to reference unsafe sex,
. I always found that odd.
And it's also the name of a band, The Breeders.
I find it to be slightly more offensive than the term cracker, but less offensive than most other words. I don't use it in that context though.
particularly gang bangs/orgies
And it's also the name of a band, The Breeders.
I find it to be slightly more offensive than the term cracker, but less offensive than most other words. I don't use it in that context though.
Team Filler
Member
Right, but it is used as a derogatory term towards others, and for it to be allowed doesn't seem appropriate even if the specific individuals it's directed towards don't mind being called "breeders".
bafflewaffle
Member
Your concern is a bit tangential to mine, but I am quite appreciative of your thoughts. As it is outside my expertise perhaps I am not properly qualified to evaluate the intentions of such traducements. If I may speculate however, to name someone as a breeder it would appear to state that such individual's sole purpose is reproduction through the somewhat primitive and arbitrary mechanical contrivance of sexual copulation. That is to say, such individual possesses no other human qualities of interest to anyone, neither intellectual, social, clevernesses of art or artifice, save for the sex organs that all are born with. One must consider the meaning of words such as potency in this context. Sexual potency is related to human potential (ie birth), and the heterosexual's capability (indeed readiness/fertility) for such process is the basis whereupon the homosexual's derision derives. If I may perhaps err on injudiciousness, I shall speculate further. The homosexual assemblage views themselves above such base functions, whose distaste for "traditional" intercourse marks him or her as a next evolutionary step in the hierarchy of man. Such proclamations which may perhaps be injurious to the intended party may also be a "necessary step" in individuation. But such considerations may be obviated when one considers the proximity to fecal materials the homosexual male must contend with. The practicing male homosexual must avail himself of enemas and the like in consideration to his partner or life-mate, lest he cause offense. It is quite an interesting matter and indeed it cannot be concluded for certain if said epithet is truly injurious. Perhaps such an "inconclusive conclusion" was ineluctable.
Mayhaps you are confused. I shall clear up in forthright fashion. My second statement was regarding of the propensity of "forumites" to utilise any discussion of a female as pretext for making statements on her sexual attractiveness or speculate on her sexual proclivities. Such an inversion of said habituation would be most mirthful.
Psychological Intellect
Banned
nvm
Isn't this the exact same argument that people have been making about dick vs. cunt for like half this thread, completely fruitlessly?
You know what they say, mo people mo problems.
Pretty much. Insulting, demographic-specific terms are only against the rules if they apply to an oppressed minority. It's lame, but what can you do?
I would let it pass. I generally have more of a problem when it is applied in a derogatory manner towards a person, whether it is a poster or another individual; I do not care if it is used to describe a task or used in a self-deprecating manner.
What if it's used as slang for a girlfriend, like how some rappers use it. For example, saying "I'm taking my bitch out somewhere nice for dinner".
Steve Youngblood
Member
After all, you wouldn't take someone you didn't respect out for a nice dinner!
Won't somebody please think of the affluent, white, heterosexual males?! They've suffered in silence for so long...
- Status