Is GAF too strict?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Glad I haven't taken any creepshots for EviL Travels, or I'd have to Amir0x them! ;b

igajpp80ipyTg.gif
 
What have the mods said over and over in this thread about qualifying statements?
I don't know, I haven't been keeping up with this thread. Today was my first time reading it, actually.

I'll let you in on a little secret. Most people get banned not because of their opinions in and of itself but because those opinions are laced with stupid comments.
So if "most" people get banned for lacing their opinions with stupidity, then that means "some" are being banned for the opinion itself. And let's be honest here, "stupid" is a very vague term which can vary wildly depending on the particular mod's definition and belief system.
 
So if "most" people get banned for lacing their opinions with stupidity, then that means "some" are being banned for the opinion itself.

We already know some people get banned for their opinions, because they're sexists/racists/transphobes/Nazis/what have you.

Some people instead get banned for being KIND of sexist/racist/etc., and also being a jerk.
 
So if "most" people get banned for lacing their opinions with stupidity, then that means "some" are being banned for the opinion itself. And let's be honest here, "stupid" is a very vague term which can vary wildly depending on the particular mod's definition and belief system.
Not necessarily. They could get banned for unrelated reasons.
 
So if "most" people get banned for lacing their opinions with stupidity, then that means "some" are being banned for the opinion itself. And let's be honest here, "stupid" is a very vague term which can vary wildly depending on the particular mod's definition and belief system.

Posted earlier:

Yeah, and the mod staff has said so explicitly like thirty times in this thread. There are opinions that are against our TOS and we will ban you for expressing them.
 
I don't know, I haven't been keeping up with this thread. Today was my first time reading it, actually.


So if "most" people get banned for lacing their opinions with stupidity, then that means "some" are being banned for the opinion itself. And let's be honest here, "stupid" is a very vague term which can vary wildly depending on the particular mod's definition and belief system.

We already know some people get banned for their opinions, because they're sexists/racists/transphobes/Nazis/what have you.

Some people instead get banned for being KIND of sexist/racist/etc., and also being a jerk.

Hey, I didn't even have to answer the question. Thanks pigeon!
 
How did AlphaNoid get banned? I looked through his recent posts and didn't see anything outside his normal shtick...

Also Now Tayne I can get into.
 
his normal shtick is probably why he got banned

Yep.

They should make him pass an exam before he's allowed back in. One question, multiple choice:

1. Does it make sense to take a $100k pay cut in order to stay out of a higher tax bracket?
a) Of course, my dad/uncle/brother totally did that!
b) No, that would be ridiculous and stupid.
 
Right, but a person who says they don't think licking an imaginary vagina should be illegal is not necessarily endorsing that behavior either. Yet, on GAF, that is the conclusion that is immediately drawn and that person will likely be banned for having a "sexist" opinion. It's ludicrous.

Who got banned for saying X objectionable behavior should nonetheless be legal?
 
Yep.

They should make him pass an exam before he's allowed back in. One question, multiple choice:

1. Does it make sense to take a $100k pay cut in order to stay out of a higher tax bracket?
a) Of course, my dad/uncle/brother totally did that!
b) No, that would be ridiculous and stupid.
I'd totally pick A, as a poor person.
 
It was for the good of all. When you're a coward who essentially runs off as soon as he has his opinions questioned, and yet you still repeat the same old talking points in dozens of threads, it's time to go.

That's a lot of the shit-and-run trolls out there.
 
You can just check the list that has been posted in this thread about the casualties.

Oh hi there, zon.

The list of death:
Linked posts are verification of the user being banned, not necessarily the post that got them banned.

First batch of unfortunate souls
  1. Dennis
  2. PinkCrayon
  3. f0lken
  4. Baby Milo
  5. Apeopleman
  6. Pandaman
  7. Kite
  8. PumpkinPie
  9. Instigator
  10. polyh3dron
  11. Foliorum Viridum
  12. Phat Michael
  13. Chun-Li On A Bike
  14. Raiden
  15. Jake McLargeHuge
    [*]
    Kloteweer
  16. Panzon
  17. Ooccoo
  18. shinobi602
  19. TeethMummy
  20. phosphor112
  21. ThisWreckage
  22. Gospel
  23. curttrad
  24. Jangocube
  25. lush
  26. Forceatowulf
  27. itxaka
  28. BPRD
  29. LeBrick James
  30. Trey
  31. joelseph
  32. JDinomite
  33. GraveHorizon
    [*]
    akira28

Second batch of unfortunate souls

  1. depths20XX
  2. Blasty
  3. disappeared
  4. apocalidiot
  5. Ryaaan14
  6. thehypocrite
  7. nilbog21
  8. Psychological Intellect
  9. sk3
  10. Pecan1
  11. Newline
  12. fuzzyreactor
  13. sky
 
The only beef that I have with Gaf is an overdose of politically correct speech, but that has more to do with posters than mods, me thinks, since we have been able to have quite "politically incorrect" topics about sensible subjects such as gipsy's convivence or the whole Mohammad's cartoon riots.

We already know some people get banned for their opinions, because they're sexists/racists/transphobes/Nazis/what have you.

Some people instead get banned for being KIND of sexist/racist/etc., and also being a jerk.

True freedom of expression can only be found in Stormfront's halls of knowdegle, it is known :p
 
Right, but a person who says they don't think licking an imaginary vagina should be illegal is not necessarily endorsing that behavior either. Yet, on GAF, that is the conclusion that is immediately drawn and that person will likely be banned for having a "sexist" opinion. It's ludicrous.

Saying ni@@er isn't illegal as well but it will get you banned here

GAF is about creating a safe environment to post in

A creeper thread is not that


Just like a bar or restaurant would kick you out for licking that imaginary vagina at it's customers
 
Right, but a person who says they don't think licking an imaginary vagina should be illegal is not necessarily endorsing that behavior either. Yet, on GAF, that is the conclusion that is immediately drawn and that person will likely be banned for having a "sexist" opinion. It's ludicrous.

Calling trans people "faggots" like you do in the fighting game gaf IRC isn't illegal either, and most people would agree that it shouldn't be illegal, but it'll get you banned.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom