S
slugbahr
Unconfirmed Member
Your avatar is generic as fuck.Music evolved way past that generic rock sound. It's boring af to listen to now.
Ironically.
Your avatar is generic as fuck.Music evolved way past that generic rock sound. It's boring af to listen to now.
lolYour avatar is generic as fuck.
Ironically.
Now you're dissing vanilla ice cream!?!lol
Hey I'm not talking about alternative stuff... I love that stuff.
Vanilla/butt rock on the other hand can simply fuck off.
been dead for a long time now.
yes without a doubt. i got into a local punk/DIY scene around 2000 and was big into that for a solid 10-15 years. tons of bands, shows, albums, releases, etc. i barely paid attentiont to modern pop or rock or whatever they call it. i didn't listen to the radio unless it was college. some of my friends got jobs DJing and i performed live on radio a few times. all of this was with guitars/bass/drums, standard rock setup. alternate music can entirely replace mainstream music, and in many ways, it's a far better replacement.
yet outside of the White Stripes and the Strokes there really has been nobody in the mainstream holding the torch for a long time. ultimately it comes down to that, if you are letting mainstream define what is music. just because mainstream media doesn't know of good music doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
for me, it never went away, there have always been interesting guitar based musicians, there still are. the MGMT and Andrew WK albums that came out last year were incredible, with lots of great Pink Floyd and Queen style classic rock between both those new albums. but still with a fresh approach.
automation, largely. the rock bands of the 60s 70s and 80s all played their instruments. nowadays you can just make songs out of loops. that's what "modern rock" acts like Imagine Dragons do. it is a fundamentally anti-performance way to construct music, yet it is economically cheaper, so the industry favors it. why have a band run through a song for hours and hours getting better and better until they get the right performance when you can just program it all to be a perfect sterile robotic sequence in 30 minutes? you save time and money. yes, the performance is greatly simplified and reduced to a digital sequence, but it will still sell because it serves a primary function. that's the beauty of placement. it doesn't need to be good music.
there are many reasons why modern music is horrible, from favoritism to nepotism to production techniques (everything is over compressed these days, eliminating natural dynamics) to marketing, etc. one of the Grammy CEO's stepped down recently, saying there was massive favoritism in the industry. plus, the convenience has made artists lazy, or at the very least, making music has become too easy to do. music can be made by one person entirely on a laptop, without anyone else involved. this is great and freeing but it also results in a far less musical production than a song that is rehearsed and learned by a group of musicians that all perform it together. actual music still exists. it's just that the
"music industry" hasn't cared about music for decades (just look at the Universal fires).
IMO Nirvana actually did kill the music industry like Kurt Cobain wanted. but that's a story for another time.
I mean Weather came out the other week. Dude still has it.I heard the heart of Rock and Roll is in Huey Lewis
Or keep complaining about the kids and their bippity boop music.I mean Weather came out the other week. Dude still has it.
Everyone in this thread wants a dad rock revival. It's not gonna happen. Either accept the New Wave or stay silent.![]()
I, for one, would be interested to hear that Nirvana story.
Ironically, modern musicians that portray that rebellious kind of character are part of the establishment. They are products of the industry and whenever one dies or lays low, another comes along to replace him. There is nothing anti-establishment in going through the motions the industry tells you to.Now the rockers are the boring looking people in the music world. They speak better, more intelligent, and don't really cause any scandals. Rockers are no longer anti establishment because that's what kids want. They want shit their parents hate, and their parents grew up on rock and metal.
I second this!
Ironically, modern musicians that portray that rebellious kind of character are part of the establishment. They are products of the industry and whenever one dies or lays low, another comes along to replace him. There is nothing anti-establishment in going through the motions the industry tells you to.
Nope, watch this. Rock lives, just more niche.
I, for one, would be interested to hear that Nirvana story.
Ed fucking Sheeran. His music is mediocre.
Can you elaborate on that?
I don't like his style. But technically, harmonically and vocally he's super good.
For example I can agree that JJ (Kaleo) has more drive and is much more old-school-rock-n-roll, but the quality of Sheeran stuff is simply better.
I mean he's fucking lift music. No energy. It's about as exciting as listening to Celine Dion. It's for bored housewives. It has all the dynamism and excitement of a duck fart.
Trust me, inside they're housewives. And you're right, drive is not popular right now, as I pointed out in my post. We need drive back.Ah. Ok. But drive is not popular right now.
It's seasonal.
And last time I've checked Ed is pretty popular amongst hot girls. No housewives.![]()