OG_Original Gamer
Member
THE LATEST GAMESPOTTING ARTICLE: http://www.gamespot.com/features/6128136/p-18.html
Innovation is what it's called when your console has a unique feature. Otherwise, it's called a gimmick.
It makes perfect sense to insult a company's lineup one moment and at the same time hope that company will go third party and develop for your console the next.
A sequel on another console is a "rehash," while a sequel on your console is not; in fact, it's highly anticipated.
It makes perfect sense to insult a company's lineup one moment and at the same time hope that company will go third party and develop for your console the next.
OG_Original Gamer said:I see some have viewed the thread, but choose to not post any comment. I wonder why that is?
Disco Stu said:Ah, save me from smarmy opinion pieces like that.
The Take Out Bandit said:Yeah, it's great to be lectured about your preferences by a group of folks with access to courtesy / review copies of the latest games, and god knows what other wonderful perks (complimentary hardware, etc.). Keep on truckin'.
But hey - it panders to the consumer whore sensibility, so it must be true! Don't stop to think of the impact on your wallet.
The One Console Future is inevitable. ^_^
pilonv1 said:No mention of Nintendo, they're obviously anti-Sony and anti-Microsoft!
chespace said:who wrote that?
i wanna buy him a drink. (we all know gamespot does not have female editors![]()
bill0527 said:Some of us have to make choices.
Gamespot said:You must realize, that some companies are evil, and some are inherently good. Some companies do it for the money, others do it... so, well, you can brag about them.
Zeo said:Aw, poor guy can't handle an opinion?
Offended?
bill0527 said:Exactly.
Let these fuckers go damn near bankrupt if they had to spend their own money to own 3 consoles and a high end PC and all the latest games, and then come lecture me about being a fanboy.
Unless you're getting your shit free.. hello Gamespot, hardly anyone has 2k a month, 4k during holiday season to shell out for all the latest everything. Some of us have to make choices.
moku said:It's a stupid article, and all it does is point out a Human charactoristic; Loyalty.
too true! While i believe even game reviewers have a bit of bias in them, these are great! :lolOG_Original Gamer said:A game that is scored less than a 9.5 on any platform you don't own is called a flop. If it does achieve that score, it's called overrated. (According to the GameSpot rating system, a game rated 8 or above is "great," but we all know that it really means "flop.")
It makes perfect sense to insult a company's lineup one moment and at the same time hope that company will go third party and develop for your console the next.
Yeah pretty much. Fanboys are all retarded despite the platform for which they champion. Seems to be a fairly accurate portrayl of the wonderful thing that is the fanboy mentality. No gamer is 100% unbiased but that doesn't bean you have to delve into the depths of the fanboy realm.Pachinko said:It's my firm belief at this moment that anyone who disagrees with what this article says or critisizes it harshly would obviously answer YES to the question posed in this threads title.
There's no difference... but you can keep telling yourself there is between your family and a corporation.Geek said:Loyalty to a corporate entity is as puerile as it is stupid. This characteristic should be reserved for friends, family, and loved ones, not name brands. Like an individual or team's work? Fine. Loyalty to a coyright? Misguided.