CrunchinJelly
formerly cjelly
Bring back the Game Boy brand, Nintendo.
Kayo-kun said:There's 0 3DS games out that interests me. If they don't release far more quality games, it looks like I'll skip it. Nintendo did an awful job with 3DS, especially after what they accomplished with DS. Guess they thought more people would buy it only due to the the 3D fad.
The price will most likely go down again in a year or so and I'll buy it when a bomba deal comes out.
VanMardigan said:
Lord Ghirahim said:Silly media, it's "Nintendo Submits Defeat".
short-lived 2009 NeoGAF meme
jjasper said:So are they going to try a different marketing approach with this price drop? Surely they will do something to fix the current issue of customers thinking it is just a DS.
Nintendo is far from emergency mode, analyst Jesse Divnich told Wired.com last week. And yet the Japanese gamemaker slashed the price of its Nintendo 3DS Thursday from $250 to $170.
Just at that moment, someone somewhere in Kyoto flipped a big switch labeled Emergency Mode.
The warning lights had been flashing for a while. Nintendo itself pointed out that sales of the 3-D portable game machine had dropped below expectations. Key software partners were delaying and canceling games, bad news for a platform that had not been on the market six months.
Thats a fair-minded assessment; Nintendo does the bulk of its business during the Christmas season. But its telling that not even Nintendo was willing to give itself a holiday season. At some point during the past few months, the company apparently had its come-to-Jesus moment. It wasnt enough for Nintendo execs to hold their breaths and think of Christmas. 3DS was way too expensive.
Even at $170, its still too expensive.
The price cut, said Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter in an e-mail to Wired.com, is pretty dramatic, but it really just reflects that they (and I) were out of touch with the market. They (and I) thought they could sell out at $249, and they (and I) were wrong.
Hey, as long as were doing the mea culpas, I blew it too: What is all but certain is that Nintendos momentum coming off the ridiculous success of DS, coupled with the wonderful novelty of the 3DS display and the handhelds strong software lineup, will cause the 3DS to fly off shelves at launch, spread like wildfire this year and be the hottest Christmas present of 2011.
On the one hand, the drastic nature of the cut, unprecedented in the companys long history, puts Nintendo 3DS in a totally new pricing bracket. As Stephen Totilo pointed out on Kotaku, it is no longer more expensive than an Xbox 360; its now cheaper than an iPod Touch.
Except its not really cheaper than an iPod Touch. Sure, the price of entry is lower now, but what happens after that? New 3DS games cost $40 each. There are no demos, and third-party publishers seem to be taking active steps to make used games less appealing.
I have played more Super Stickman Golf (99 cents) on my iPhone than I have played any 3DS game. Meanwhile, the Nintendo 3DS eShop download service is full of expensive games (fuzzy black-and-white Game Boy games from 1989 start at $3, and the good ones you actually want cost $4). The ridiculous payment structure will only take your money in increments of $5, then give you nothing to buy with it: Nintendo declined to even re-release a single Game Boy title in this weeks update.
At the Game Developers Conference in March, 3DS producer Hideki Konno said Nintendo was reluctant to ever put its digital content on sale, a basic practice that can boost long-term sales even after the sale is over.
Id be a little sad to see if there was a product that I worked on for a couple of years go on sale for a buck, he said.
It is thus the height of irony that Nintendos plan to appease the poor suckers who paid $250 for Nintendo 3DS is to give them 20 free digital games. On Sept. 1, youll be able to download 10 major Nintendo Entertainment System titles and 10 games from the Game Boy Advance library.
Nintendo says it currently has no plans to make the Game Boy Advance games available on the eShop to the general public. Of course not. Why would it do something that makes all the sense in the world?
I think that both Vita and 3DS compare unfavorably to iPhone and Android devices.
The X factor here is Vitas downloadable games service, which we know absolutely nothing about. Sony has said all retail games will be sold online day and date with the cartridge versions. Sony says a lot of things, though. I will believe that when I see it.
Whether or not that happens, Sony is clearly much more serious about pushing digital game sales than Nintendo. But this is no longer a fight between two handheld gaming machines. Its a fight between traditional handhelds and smartphones. Sony doesnt need to show what Vita can do that 3DS cant it needs to show why youd pay $40 per game when the competitions price is $0.
Reuenthal said:It seems that Investors were scared and run off due to short term loss of profit. I see it becoming profitable due to the price and new software coming but I doubt as profitable as Iwata expects in that short period. But I see his gambit paying off in the long term.
Also if I had Nintendo shares I would keep them.
Mael said:Comparing Other M to Zelda 2 is laughable to the extreme, Zelda 2 had excellent market reception. It sold fairly well and it's only recently that it's been seen as the black sheep.
Seriously it sold at least 8 times better on NES with a vastly reduced market on a smaller userbase than Other M on Wii.
It's not comparable AT ALL.
orioto said:Yeah, you're trying to avoid my real message here![]()
DD made those little games possible, sure, but what i'm trying to show is clearly that you can innovate with a piece os paper and a pen, and i don't like when Miyamoto (as id did recently) tries to make us believe that gaming is dead without Nintendo hardware gimmicks. gaming can evolve without Nintendo forcing this changes.
And that's what i'm saying exactly about the 3ds. You say nintendo can innovate and this is not the problem, but this time they just bullshited us. Well i say, they did that cause their strategy is to innovate at all cost and to sell hardware based on those innovations, more than the games. Except now that there is no "free" innovations that they can use while nobody had think about it before, well.. they have to bullshit us.
IceDoesntHelp said:Everytime I see your posts, you always, ALWAYS hate on Nintendo...whats your problem? Ironic since your avatar is Ghirahim from Skyward Sword. I know Nintendo's in a tight spot, but god is it necessary to be such an ass about it? I say Nintendo is NOT doomed, just in an extremely tight spot right now. One false move could make things really, really bad for Nintendo.
Graphics Horse said:Where was this said? I assumed there was simply confusion over this game being a 2d Mario extruded into the 3rd dimension. I'm talking about the '2 3DS marios' rumour rather than Wii U NSMB of course.
lawblob said:Well, of course you would keep them, at least short term. The last thing you want to do is sell your position the day *after* the big selloff occurs, when the company still has good fundamentals.
Kusagari said:I really don't like Iwata giving it a time limit to resurrect. He's basically forced his hand now by making such a claim. If 3DS doesn't become a huge success in those 4 months, Nintendo's going to be looking a lot worse.
FuzzyNorman said:People have to remember that gamers on GAF are different than the majority of people who own a DS. Kids don't pass on the 3DS because of the lack of RPG's or certain 3rd party games. They pass on it because their parents see the price tag. The lower price + Mario + good advertising would make the 3DS boom.
Currently the average consumer does't know that/doesn't care plus the standard DS library is massive, I think there would still be a portion of consumers that would rather have a DSi/XL.Lonely1 said:The new software that the 3DS will receive that isn't compatible with the older DSes?
He's confusing you with Joke poster BurntPork who has a similar profile picLord Ghirahim said:¿Qué?
You've got the wrong Ghirahim.IceDoesntHelp said:Everytime I see your posts, you always, ALWAYS hate on Nintendo...whats your problem? Ironic since your avatar is Ghirahim from Skyward Sword. I know Nintendo's in a tight spot, but god is it necessary to be such an ass about it? I say Nintendo is NOT doomed, just in an extremely tight spot right now. One false move could make things really, really bad for Nintendo.
Vinci said:No, that's not what I'm saying. I think Nintendo and its developers truly think 3D is awesome. They think it's amazing. They've dedicated years of effort on trying to get it into one of their systems. The problem is, they lost sight of what the audience wants. This was stupid. The same thing happened when Sony decided to stick Blu-Ray into the PS3. People, at that time, didn't have the slightest interest in replacing DVD. That was an internally focused decision, just as the 3DS is from Nintendo.
So no, I don't think Nintendo lied or try to do anything purposely deceitful. I think they just care about 3D significantly more than the mainstream audience does.
BurntPork said:Four months isn't enough, sadly. This will probably go down as the Virtual Boy 2. In fact, the only reason it hasn't been killed yet is because the market is larger than it was when VB was introduced. 3DS will be discontinued very soon.
slopeslider said:He's confusing you with Joke poster BurntPork who has a similar profile pic
Well that article was written with quite a bit of emotion and negativity no? Even as an editorial it doesn't seem very considered. If the dsi and dsi xl sold at around that price then the 3ds should too unless the hardware has a fundamental flaw of some sort in terms of consumer perception.madmaxx350 said:I don't see why people say at 170 that the 3DS is too expensive, I think for what it offers the price is right.
slopeslider said:He's confusing you with Joke poster BurntPork who has a similar profile pic
Brazil said:You've got the wrong Ghirahim.
slopeslider said:He's confusing you with Joke poster BurntPork who has a similar profile pic
So I do...my bad. Sorry about that :/Brazil said:You've got the wrong Ghirahim.
What does it even mean to be a joke poster, can't you get banned for that cuz his comments are ridiculous and almost always derail the topic.slopeslider said:He's confusing you with Joke poster BurntPork who has a similar profile pic
I like my 2D Mario. And I like it 2D.jett said:I dunno about you by 3DLand looks like a NSMB successor to me.
Valnen said:Even with a drastic price drop, even if they release amazing games, I still won't buy one. Not until they fix the issues with the system like the screens scratching each other and such with a new hardware revision.
I laughed when he played the "sarcasm" card earlier in this topic. Never change BurntPork, never change.artwalknoon said:What does it even mean to be a joke poster, can't you get banned for that cuz his comments are ridiculous and almost always derail the topic.
Remember GameCube? If Iwata doesn't believe in something he slashes the price and halts a bunch of projects and cuts budgets in half. Nintendo isn't going to subsidize their system in the long run like Sony did with the PS3. They'll just announce a new 'Nintendo X' in 2 years time.Piercedveil said:I agree with you. I didn't understand that part either.
Kintaro said:Thing is, he is 100% correct here. Nintendo digital model is a piece of shit and that's why I don't trust them for a second on the free games bit.
The GC had a normal 5 year lifespan.[Nintex] said:Remember GameCube? If Iwata doesn't believe in something he slashes the price and halts a bunch of projects and cuts budgets in half. Nintendo isn't going to subsidize their system in the long run like Sony did with the PS3. They'll just announce a new 'Nintendo X' in 2 years time.
Theonik said:Currently the average consumer does't know that/doesn't care plus the standard DS library is massive, I think there would still be a portion of consumers that would rather have a DSi/XL.
orioto said:Well our opinions are not that far from each other. Maybe i shouldn't see Nintendo as so evil, and maybe you see them in a too positive way.
Let's say they like 3D, and i know they do cause they wanted to put that in something since the nes (that's why they were blinded i think), but that doesn't mean some strategy guys at Nintendo didn't say at some point "ok so yeah guys, we don't have a lot of new things here, maybe that's the good time for the 3D"
Kusagari said:I really don't like Iwata giving it a time limit to resurrect. He's basically forced his hand now by making such a claim. If 3DS doesn't become a huge success in those 4 months, Nintendo's going to be looking a lot worse.
DNF said:Oh come on.
Because Nintendos online isn't as good as their competition you don't believe that the early 3ds buyers get 20 free nes +gba games ?
what kind of logic is this ? really ?
[Nintex] said:Remember GameCube? If Iwata doesn't believe in something he slashes the price and halts a bunch of projects and cuts budgets in half. Nintendo isn't going to subsidize their system in the long run like Sony did with the PS3. They'll just announce a new 'Nintendo X' in 2 years time.
Billychu said:Who is ghirahim? He looks like a gay vampire.
notsureifserious.pngGravijah said:Ganon's Dad.