"MAJOR HULL DAMAGE, CAPTAIN"I think it's the right thing to do. Now they can introduce a new character. If I was in charge, I'd give more attention to this dude.
![]()
I think it's the right thing to do. Now they can introduce a new character. If I was in charge, I'd give more attention to this dude.
![]()
Time for that White haired bridge officer lady from into darkness to step up.
But yeah. Not recasting is the right call. Say the character is in command of another ship or something.
I think it's the right thing to do. Now they can introduce a new character. If I was in charge, I'd give more attention to this dude.
![]()
Trill from Insurrection please
Yeah cant say i agree either. If he was the first to play the character I could maybe see it, but he wasnt. I could see skipping out on any appearance in the next movie as a sign of respect, but thats it.
Okay, this has my vote.I like the way youthink
That's fine. Gives them an opportunity to try out a brand new character.
The only major female they have is Uhura in the TOS. I say bring in a woman replacement for that bridge position.
He got permanently aged into Walter Koenig.I really liked Chekov, but I think this is the for the best. Sad to see it happen, because he was wonderful.
If they were to recast him in the Abramverse (which I hope goes the distance and eventually hits Next Gen), I'd prefer if there were in continuity reasons as to why he looks different. If they wrote him transforming or whatever, I'd be down with that. But to quietly replace him with another actor? All I'd be asking is "in the context of this film series, why did this one character transform with nobody pointing it out?"
So I think it's best to avoid the issue entirely and not have the character in the films. I wish Beyond the best of luck in the box office, and I will absolutely be watching it and thinking of Yelchin.