John Dunbar
correct about everything
There would need to be some big agricultural changes. Humans currently consume more than the Earth is able to produce.
not according to world food programme.
There would need to be some big agricultural changes. Humans currently consume more than the Earth is able to produce.
Immigration helps for one and they're not losing as much as Japan is.Most first world countries haven't seen a significant increase of their populations. It's all about the efficieny of the working group.
This problem isn't going away in a generation. There are DEEPLY rooted cultural mores that are very anti-women and very outdated. These aren't easy fixes if people cared, but people in Japan for the most part are incredibly politically and socially apathetic.
This is going to get much worse before it gets better. But it will, in time, get better. Because it has too.
Not surprising given their immigration policies.
This world could easily support 30 billion people
The stat is something like in the US, 97% of Americans live on 3% of the land America has.
The world isn't even close to overpopulation.
Nigeria is a good example why the population growth must be stopped.
That's the problem, don't you think? It certainly shouldn't be one or the other. It's not in any other 1st world country that I can think of. They need to fix their culture and attitudes towards such things while they still have time. Shit standards, outdated customs and attitudes will sink them at this pace.
Economic growth will hopefully curb that shit.
Why is it a good example?
It's honestly one of the most interesting stories of our current time. Makes you wonder if it's just a human reaction to overpopulation. Makes you wonder if it'll spread.
That's the thing about playing Persona 4. That cute little town of Inaba you play in likely won't exist in the near future. That tension between rural and urban is very interesting.
Immigration helps for one and they're not losing as much as Japan is.
Nevertheless, I see more consolidation in the future. We're already becoming more urbanized.
Honestly, the goals should be
1) Getting radical life extension done by 2050
2) Gradually starting to wind down sexual reproduction as our main method of propagation and getting cloning facilities set up that will operate at a replacement level (which should be quite low once we get #1 accomplished).
Ideally both of these would be well accomplished by the end of the century.
But Japan could probably go ahead with the cloning facilities today. They could probably be up and running by 2020 if they put some money into the project.
Its not like Japan hasnt drastically restructured their society in a relatively short time frame before. I just dont know what is the direction.
Need a combination of immigration and changing your economic system to be less abusive towards workers so they have more time and money to establish families.
This is a trend that will affect many western countries.
'open the borders' is an easy thing to say, but I don't really think it would stop the declining population.
There will be European countries facing population decline too, even with more immigration than a country like Japan.
Need a combination of immigration and changing your economic system to be less abusive towards workers so they have more time and money to establish families.
without immigration US probably is showing the same trend. People in developed economy can not afford or are not willing to have children.
without immigration US probably is showing the same trend. People in developed economy can not afford or are not willing to have children.
I'm pretty sure birth rates in the US have been a bit below the replacement level for a few years now, but for the US immigration is still big enough to overcome it.But in the US isn't the end goal still to move to the suburbs and have a few kids? I know I've seen a few polls posted in a thread here where it's taking us millennials longer to enter the housing market but people polled still saw themselves living the old fashion American dream eventually.
This is a trend that will affect many western countries.
'open the borders' is an easy thing to say, but I don't really think it would stop the declining population.
There will be European countries facing population decline too, even with more immigration than a country like Japan.
And even the families that want to have kids will often just have 1.
Japan isn't even in the top 100 countries for equality for women, so it's super dangerous to even take a break from your career as a woman in Japan to be pregnant, since the "work forever" culture is amplified for them if they take time off.
This. Many modern economies will face this problem eventually. In some places immigration is enough to keep the population stable or growing for the time being but eventually things will slow down for all modern ecnonomies.
It's unclear to me if overall this is a bad or good thing though. Obviously the implications for social programs based on continued growth will not be sustainable, but that doesn't mean there isn't a workable solution somewhere. Meanwhile, global population on a downward trend might help the environment.
I don't know if I like the idea of cloning people as a means to populate the planet. It just sounds weird.
I think countries like Italy, Greece, and Portugal are already showing the same problems.This. Many modern economies will face this problem eventually. In some places immigration is enough to keep the population stable or growing for the time being but eventually things will slow down for all modern ecnonomies.
It's unclear to me if overall this is a bad or good thing though. Obviously the implications for social programs based on continued growth will not be sustainable, but that doesn't mean there isn't a workable solution somewhere. Meanwhile, global population on a downward trend might help the environment.
It's already happening in pretty much every developed country if you exclude immigration. For example Germany has had declining population since 1970s if you exclude immigration. Japan really isn't as big outlier in this as most people think.
And even the families that want to have kids will often just have 1.
I'm not really sure I'd say it's a good thing.On topic though population decline is a good thing. It will force us to value things in a more healthy, sustainable manner. In particular the focus of economic policy in developed countries should be efficiency, not growth.
Many of the people I've encountered in Japan who do have kids, will very often have just 1. Or at least that's what I've noticed. Maybe two at most. And I believe a replacement rate is considered 2.1 not 2.From what I've heard that's not really an issue, at least not in Japan. The problem is the large number of people who stay single for life, if you were to cut them out of the equation you'd have a stable fertility rate of 2.0 children per woman.
I'm not really sure I'd say it's a good thing.
You're going to have a larger and larger elderly population, supported by a smaller and smaller workforce.
I'm not really sure I'd say it's a good thing.
You're going to have a larger and larger elderly population, supported by a smaller and smaller workforce.
There would need to be some big agricultural changes. Humans currently consume more than the Earth is able to produce.
If Nigeria can keep it together, they are going to be a giant force in the future.
So what happened in the last 100 years everywhere?
People shouldn't forget that a lot of the increasement of the total population is just a result of people also getting older.
I don't know if that is necessarily true.
The median age in the US in 1950 for example was 30 years old. 20 years later, after the population had increased by over 50 million, the median age had actually gone down to 28 years. That increase isn't a result of people getting older.
More like lots of scarcities are virtual creations of market economies where you have a shitton of resources getting funneled to a wealthy minority who wastes them uncontrollably, while billions get by on an incredibly small percentage of the resources produced globally every year.
We don't really have an agricultural/production problem so much as we have an ridiculously unequal resource allocation problem.
While a constant decline is a problem, isn't this a good thing as far as beating overpopulation goes?
EDIT: Maybe people will finally get to live in homes that aren't box sized
I don't know if that is necessarily true.
The median age in the US in 1950 for example was 30 years old. 20 years later, after the population had increased by over 50 million, the median age had actually gone down to 28 years. That increase isn't a result of people getting older.
Don't take this the wrong way but do not open borders.
Their culture should be kept pure.
Don't take this the wrong way but do not open borders.
Their culture should be kept pure.