• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Jason Scheier: Blizzard Co-Founder left Blizzard because he was tired of dealing with Bob Kotick

Draugoth

Gold Member
Blizzard co-founder Mike Morhaime left Blizzard because he was reportedly tired of fighting with former Activision CEO Bobby Kotick, according to those who worked closely with him, the two leaders having butted heads for years regarding the future of Blizzard.

New details about Morhaime's 2018 departure and Blizzard's contentious relationship with Activision come via an excerpt from Bloomberg reporter Jason Schreier's upcoming book Play Nice: The Rise, Fall, and Future of Blizzard Entertainment , which releases on October 8 (the same day Blizzard's first expansion for Diablo 4, Vessel of Hatred, launches).

For years, Morhaime attempted to keep Activision, which acquired Blizzard in 2007, at bay. That goal of keeping Blizzard insulated from outside Activision pressure became harder in 2013 when Blizzard canceled project Titan, an FPS MMO that had been intended to be the next World of Warcraft, according to Schreier.

Source
 

Spukc

always chasing the next thrill
Nothingburger.
season 3 burger GIF
 

Embearded

Member
When you are purchased the culture will change, you can slow it down but the parent company will inject everything into your company over time. It is the price for accepting the money.

That is what i've been saying since the day MS announced the acquisition of Activision/Blizzard.
I was banned in the acquisition thread of Era for saying that.

When a publisher with multiple studios purchases another Publisher or studio, they have to fully intergrade them or they will lose the trust of their existing studios. You cannot have double standards, it will backfire in one way or another.
 

AJUMP23

Parody of actual AJUMP23
That is what i've been saying since the day MS announced the acquisition of Activision/Blizzard.
I was banned in the acquisition thread of Era for saying that.

When a publisher with multiple studios purchases another Publisher or studio, they have to fully intergrade them or they will lose the trust of their existing studios. You cannot have double standards, it will backfire in one way or another.

I said it with elegance.
 
Can't say I'm surprised. Kotick always appeared as a "money first, ingenuity second" kind of CEO. He doesn't exhibit a single creative bone in his body nor did he care. He got extremely lucky that Infinity ward made CoD for him. Same goes for Guitar hero, which he never had much faith in until it went the way it did.
 
Last edited:
Can't say I'm surprised. Kotick always appeared as a "money first, ingenuity second" kind of CEO. He doesn't exhibit a single creative bone in his body nor did he care. He got extremely lucky that Infinity ward made CoD for him. Same goes for Guitar hero, which he never had much faith in until it went the way it did.

Yep

Just a lucky ass dude that had little to do with their success
 

Cyberpunkd

Gold Member
Yep

Just a lucky ass dude that had little to do with their success
You are kidding, right?

In 1987, Kotick tried to acquire Commodore International. He planned to remove the keyboard and disk drive from the Amiga 500 and turn it into a video game system. He was unsuccessful in persuading Commodore's then-Chairman Irving Gould to sell control of the company.[6]
The guy was 24 years old at that time.

In December 1990, Kotick sold his stake in Leisure Concepts and purchased a 25% stake in the almost-bankrupt Activision, then known as Mediagenic, with business partner Brian Kelly. In 1991, Kotick changed the name back to Activision, performed a full restructuring of the company, and refocused the company on making and marketing video games.[6][9][5] Kotick became CEO of Activision in February 1991.[10][11] From 1997 to 2003, Activision acquired nine development studios and released its first hit game in 1995.[5]

He is probably the most successful executive ever in a videogame industry. The guy knows how to do business.
 
I want to say it's hard to have sympathy for higher ups that sell out and complain afterwards, but in the case of Blizzard it's a bit more nuanced as they made their first deal that goes back to 1994 for the release of Warcraft, which was followed by several acquisitions by different companies eventually leading to the current Activision Blizzard. I don't think the Blizz OG's had much deciding power in this string of acquisitions. Also, without these acquisitions we probably wouldn't have the Warcraft, Starcraft and Diablo entries as good and popular as they were.
 

Cyberpunkd

Gold Member
I want to say it's hard to have sympathy for higher ups that sell out and complain afterwards, but in the case of Blizzard it's a bit more nuanced as they made their first deal that goes back to 1994 for the release of Warcraft, which was followed by several acquisitions by different companies eventually leading to the current Activision Blizzard. I don't think the Blizz OG's had much deciding power in this string of acquisitions. Also, without these acquisitions we probably wouldn't have the Warcraft, Starcraft and Diablo entries as good and popular as they were.
Thank you for this, it looks like they sold in 1994 probably just on the curb of making it big with Warcraft.
 

lh032

I cry about Xbox and hate PlayStation.
Thought Microsoft is going to fix the issues according to the acquisition beggars?
 
Top Bottom