A Link to the Past
Banned
It doesnt matter if embargo's are beneficial to gamers. Reviewers sign a contract for it. Positive breaks are just as bad. Instead of your straw man argument that you see it all the time can you point to any other reviewers that have dropped little hints in regards to this specific game?
Read the thread to literally see what you asked for. Reviewers have contradicted Jim's warning throughout. And as someone noted, the embargo allows discussion of the first two worlds, so in this case, Jim certainly is not breaking embargo (and even if he was, like has been pointed out, reviewers frequently make very vague comments without issue - usually positive ones, coincidentally).