• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

John Marston vs Arthur Morgan. Better game cowboy?

Better/tougher Cowboy

  • Arthur Morgan

    Votes: 116 58.0%
  • John Marston

    Votes: 84 42.0%

  • Total voters
    200

Gamer79

Predicts the worst decade for Sony starting 2022
Both are badass in their own way and not afraid to admit that I and about 99% are pussies compared to these men. That was an unreal way of life. There were no hospitals for everyone who didn't live in a city , 911, GPS, etc. Besides that often times medical treatment itself was deadly. Back then if you ran your mouth or looked at a guy the wrong way, that was your ass. These guys shot first and didn't care to question. So who is the better Cowboy?
 

LectureMaster

Gold Member
I love Arthur more but John Marston John Marston keeps giving me gold so I have to vote for him.

9js87v.jpg
 
Last edited:

MiguelItUp

Member
Loved both games, and both characters are incredible.

But I love Marston so much as a character, I didn't think Morgan would hold a candle to him, and he did. If not more so for me, personally. So I have to go with Morgan.
 

Pimpbaa

Member
Arthur, but didn’t mind playing as John in the post game stuff in RDR2. Playing as Jack at the end of RDR1 was painful, hated him so much.
 

bender

What time is it?
Playing Jack was akin to having Niko Bellic killed within the 1st 30 minutes then playing the game as Roman.

Or Brucie. But Niko "I've come to America to change my life...*ten minutes later*..."oh sure Rastafarian drug dealer I just met, I'll murder your competition" Bellic is no John Marston or Arthur Morgan.
 

LRKD

Member
Arthur sucked ass, the muh 21st century morals cowboy who loved feminism and his mixed race friends, and hated committing crimes.

Yeah right, the cowboy gang of criminals is actual a bunch of good guys with hearts of gold who love every one and preach tolerance. Like who tf actual eats up this slop?
 
Arthur is an amazing character, incredibly written and acted, just all around one of the greatest protagonists. But so is John. In my opinion John Marston is a better cowboy.

Also, at the end of red dead 1, I hated playing as Jack, like most people. At the end of red dead 2, I loved playing as John, and many others did as well, or at least most didn’t mind.
 
Last edited:
Arthur sucked ass, the muh 21st century morals cowboy who loved feminism and his mixed race friends, and hated committing crimes.

Yeah right, the cowboy gang of criminals is actual a bunch of good guys with hearts of gold who love every one and preach tolerance. Like who tf actual eats up this slop?
Exactly, it really didn't make sense at all. Very unrealistic and inauthentic character for the time period, and he was one of the aspects that made the game so progressive - especially compared to the first game.
 

Rush2112

Member
Who was the villain in the revenant that tom hardy played? Wish red dead had a character like that.
 
Last edited:

Dacvak

No one shall be brought before our LORD David Bowie without the true and secret knowledge of the Photoshop. For in that time, so shall He appear.
I heard that everyone who votes for John Marston John Marston will get GAF gold 😂
 

Roberts

Member
Perhaps Arthur is a bit more interesting, but the story surrounding these characters is better told in RDR1.
 
Top Bottom