mightynine
Member
olimario said:I don't understand how, if she is in such a state, a court could conclude her wishes about being in such a state. It doesn't make sense.
And if she can swallow water and jello on her own, isn't it against the law that they withold her nourishment.
Oli, Oli, Oli.
Think about this for a second. The woman who claimed this, to the best of my knowledge, NEVER testified in court. She testified in an affidavit. If these claims were true, we would be hearing from PLENTY of people besides just one or two nurses. But this is not the only nurse that has ever taken care of Terri.
It's not against the law in this case because many patients every day decide to end their lives through lack of food and water. Of course, they're able to vocalize this. In Terri's case...well, that's not the case. But that's why her husband brought the question to court in the first place. And it has been decided she would not want to be kept alive in this manner. And, this is THE ONLY LEGAL WAY to carry out her demands.
If it had been determined that she would want to be kept alive, and a feeding tube was being kept from her, then we'd be talking about laws being broken.
And all this "she responds to her parents" talk? I talked to someone who saw people in this condition for years and he says chances are, it's a reflexive reaction to someone blocking the light.