KILLZONE 2 - input lag now? if you want a reskinned COD4, go play WaW
- Thread starter Wollan
- Start date
- Status
Tom Penny said:
There are a couple, but Veteran is perfect generally. It really depends on you skills tho.
For seasoned players, I totally suggest starting on Veteran.
Also, dieing is not really frustrating as every time you start again a section it plays somewhat differently. This mitigates the frustration.
This said, dieing a lot at the same spot can disrupt your willingness to play the game as intended. You might want to rush through much like what happens when continuously failing at a stealth game. This approach leads to more failure and perseveration with it might eventually lead to frustration. In this case, you need to stop playing and let it settle.
MvmntInGrn
Member
beast786 said:
Ok now thats stupid. Opinion of one is more than another? And when exactly do they decide to alter the status of one site?
Valkyr Junkie
Member
beast786 said:
Them applying weight like that is even worse :lol :lol
Tom Penny said:
Yes, you can do that. Not really on the fly tho. You have to go back to title screen, select the level and then select the lower difficulty setting.
There are no "difficulty level depending" trophies, aside the Elite one. There are just a complete game trophy and a complete game on Elite trophy.
For getting Elite, I think you don't even have to start a new campaign. You can simply pick each level from the level selection screen and go through it on Elite. Once all levels are Elite-beaten, you should get the Elite trophy.
Haunted
Member
Which is why true review score whores only use gamerankings. No rounding bullshit, just taking the average and presto. (93,2% vs 91,6%)Valkyr Junkie said:
from their site:MvmntInGrn said:
I'm sure this process is completely transparent and not influenced by advertising deals or anything.
In short, Metacritic is worthless shit. Even more so than Gamerankings.
EschatonDX said:
I was thinking about that kind of reasoning myself indeed. The AK-74 is still regularly used despite having been designed in the '70s after all. But as you said, it's not perfect. Assuming the Earth population stops fighting right now and starts living on cannabis for the next 300 years, you'd still have something more advanced than what we see in KZ2. At least double fire weapons
MvmntInGrn
Member
EschatonDX said:
I guess not solely but I assume they pour more money into it compared to any other party right? So much so that if the military didn't move firearms forward who really would?
spwolf said:
that's only when you're lying down sniping or something. But when you're running out and about, you move the gun up to you.
Well, it's technically true both ways. you move your head closer to the gun while also bringing the gun up to your eyes.
I mean, that's how I do it in painballing.
but the way how much you manage to "zoom" in on the target in a lot of FPSes makes it unrealistic
TTP said:I was thinking about that kind of reasoning myself indeed. The AK-74 is still regularly used despite being designed in the '70s after all. But as you said, it's not perfect. Assuming the Earth population stop fighting right now and starts living on cannabis for the next 300 years, you'd still have something more advanced than what we see in KZ2. At least double fire weapons
Hey man, don't doubt stoner innovation. Some of those elaborate bongs take a decent amount of physics know how to make :lol
I also doubt that the societies on Helghan and Vekta were both utopian as well. I'm sure that there would be internal strife on both worlds. These states are too big to not be constantly evolving and improving on the arms front.
3rdamention
Member
beast786 said:
This sounds like a very fancy way of saying, "We can adjust the Metacritic Average Score to be whatever we feel it should be, regardless of the reviews, since all you look at is the Average Score anyways. Our system is too advanced for you to understand so just trust the averages we give you!!!"
Valkyr Junkie
Member
Fersis said:Pretty much yeah.
Its a fancy way of saying : Our review averages arent averages at all.
More like: "We get to craft our own subjective, opaque reviews without writing a single damn word of original content. Best of luck to all of those developers that lose their jobs because they don't make our cut."
Lovely Salsa
Banned
I'm in the middle of the
and my god the graphics R AWESOME!
Does it get any better than this?
desert level
Does it get any better than this?
KZObsessed
Member
McBacon said:
Perfect 10! Yeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaah!
edit: site wont load lol
It was mentioned before, that the ISA is pretty much just a ghetto militia.TTP said:As I said earlier in this thread, I think Guerrilla has been too conservative when thinking about future military technology. They basically wrapped modern warfare with a futuristic look. I hope they push technology ahead in KZ3, albeit I have no idea how they could justify it story-wise. They might set the game in year 2500 or whatever, but it wouldn't be enough. I need a reason as to why, in the year 2350, military tech is less advanced than in GRAW. Ian, good luck with that
UCA/UCN is sitting on the cool shit. Those vertical invasion cruisers are a taste of their tech:
The Librarian
Banned
Way to spoil it. Thanks.Lovely Salsa said:
ChryZ said:
Not the whole thing please, but if you want to post some quotes that'd be real nice.
Haunted said:So basically it's a 100 at Metacritic and Gamerankings.
*continues his crusade against scores and aggregation sites*
Don't worry, those sites won't touch our 4-point-scale with a 10 foot bargepole
PjotrStroganov
Member
Lovely Salsa said:
Spoiler tag that shit you stupid!
Okay, I'm out of this topic. See you when I finished the game.
Tylahedras
Banned
So we're off input lag now and onto guns aren't futuristic enough?
- Status