It seems awfully reductive to me to take all of the gameplay complexities, world building, visual and audio experience, and the emotional effects of a powerful story and put all of that into a stupid number.
So you could say I do not like scores being assigned.
That's pretty persuasive!
I always prefer review discussions via video, like their Order video. It's one of the reasons I like Giant Bomb so much. Yes, they still do written reviews (albeit at a much slower pace than they used to), but even before a review is done there, you essentially get their opinions on a game by watching a quick look. You don't need a numbered score. You can see firsthand their reactions (good or bad) to a game. To me Kinda Funny is an evolution of what Giant Bomb started: A small team formally of a major video game site, focused heavily on video content, with some written content. Kinda Funny goes a step further by making it all video content. To me, these type of sites will become the major players in video game coverage. Sure IGN and Gamespot will still be there, but written reviews will probably go the way of the dodo, to the dismay of many, as there are some very talented writers like Colin.
Absolutely agree. I really enjoyed the Kinda Funny Order discussion. If review scores do result in shutting down that more explorative / conversational / informal approach to focused game discussions then I'd be dead against it.
I guess I'm just stuck in the habit of checking metacritic and living in that numbered world. Although I think a 5 or 10 point system is the best. I don't think it needs to be any more granular.