Didn’t enjoy this nearly as much on console as I did on PC.I've been eyeing on this game for quiet some time. How is it? It's currently on sale on xbox.
Fine, I'll do itThis thread needs that pic collage of the based developers responses to the soy army
How they usually accuse people of being racist in current year, is racist itself. Since its pointed at one race, much, much more often than not, and mainly due to the color of one's skin.Fine, I'll do it
I'm sure if Egypt developed a game with only black people the pushback would have been similarFine, I'll do it
I understand. To you 30 fps is similar to the step down people feel when they're used to 30 fps and go back to n64 games running at 15 fps.I understand what you're saying, but 30fps just hurts me. So not really physical pain, but it doesn't work for me anymore. I find it really uncomfortable, I noticed the days still with the mafia remake. The game is great, but I can't enjoy it. Probably same for KCD.
Newer tvs have vrr as well so in moments when fps drops its not nearly as visible, which also helpsI understand. To you 30 fps is similar to the step down people feel when they're used to 30 fps and go back to n64 games running at 15 fps.
How good your TV is might also be a factor. I personally still game on a plasma because motion is what I value the most in a game, not resolution. It has served me well, probably helps.
Well-written explanation of your point-of-view. Seems like Henry's age and characterization was a concession made for mass appeal reasons. No way would I want to play as a 13-year-old, even if that would've fit the story and setting better.From what a rep from the company said some time ago, Henry is 27. Yet he acts like he is 13. It's very unrealistic for a game that prides so much on historical accuracy.
For example, in the middle ages, common people would marry at 19-20 years old, on average. But he is still single and lives with his parents.
His father is a top blacksmith, that makes the best sword for the castle Lord. Henry should have started learning his father craft when he was a teen, and should be a master blacksmith at 27. Yet he is just doing errands for his father.
Most man in the middle ages had to be proficient in the use of a weapon, such as a bow, sword or polearm. For example, in many German kingdoms of the time, man were mandated to own a sword and train a number of hours per week. Yet, Henry is untrained in any of these.
He also starts a fight with the heir of the castle, where he became a guard. No way a commoner would start a fight with a Lord, as the penalty would be severe.
At 27, henry has no skills at all and doesn't know how to act in his own society. By all accounts, he is the village idiot. Someone with a mental disability.
Yet, he is supposed to be the hero, that the player identifies with.
Dragons in Skyrim, are more realistic than Henry in KCD. He is one of the worst written characters in videogames.
Maybe not an "excuse", but there are certainly a few reasons: time, staff, and money.Since this had sold so many copies it's even more pathetic that they havnt released a 60 fos patch for it. That's a developer who doesn't give a fuck about their fans, to not upgrade from 30 fps which they know is an absolute must for first person gameplay to control well. Doesn't matter if your studio isn't the biggest or richest. There's no excuse for us to still only have 30 fps on next gen consoles.
Henry is 17-18 actually and no he does not act like 13. Nowhere and nobody from Warhorse ever said Henry is 27.From what a rep from the company said some time ago, Henry is 27. Yet he acts like he is 13. It's very unrealistic for a game that prides so much on historical accuracy.
Since this had sold so many copies it's even more pathetic that they havnt released a 60 fos patch for it. That's a developer who doesn't give a fuck about their fans, to not upgrade from 30 fps which they know is an absolute must for first person gameplay to control well. Doesn't matter if your studio isn't the biggest or richest. There's no excuse for us to still only have 30 fps on next gen consoles.
Henry is 17-18 actually and no he does not act like 13. Nowhere and nobody from Warhorse ever said Henry is 27.
Your post is verbal diarrhea.
I did say Warhorse. Will Powers doesn't know shit, he is just speculating there out loud. The actor looks older than Henry actually is.Here is a representative of Deep Sliver, presenting the game to IGN, and stating that Henry is 27-ish. (7:35)
I did say Warhorse. Will Powers doesn't know shit, he is just speculating there out loud. The actor looks older than Henry actually is.
Yes, even publisher hired PR guys can be wrong. I am shocked, frankly. (that was sarcasm)He is not some random talking in youtube. He was hired by the publisher to present the game, so he has some insight about it.
So can you present any proof that henry is 16 years old, like you claimed?
Yes, even publisher hired PR guys can be wrong. I am shocked, frankly.
I did not claim he is "16" or anything specific, because Warhorse were never that specific (for obvious reasons, you can have sex in a game). I said 17-18, as in, still a teenager.
I will post the proof you seek (eventhough it is really obvious from the game itself) later, if I find it/get it.
Here is a representative of Deep Sliver, presenting the game to IGN, and stating that Henry is 27-ish. (7:35)
That's not his argument.So you just don't like his answer, therefor he is wrong.
Nice argument mate.
That's actually a good point, marketing wise 17 years old, or under 21 (for US of A) might be an issue.I did not claim he is "16" or anything specific, because Warhorse were never that specific (for obvious reasons, you can have sex in a game). I said 17-18, as in, still a teenager.
That's not my argument at all. I know with a certainty that Henry is a teenager. I have seen developers speak about it. But I don't have links to half a decade old interviews in my head. Got it?So you just don't like his answer, therefor he is wrong.
Nice argument mate.
Well, he might have been wrong seeing it's an interview and he is saying a lot of things from the top of his head and it wasn't corroborated since, but even if he isn't... Why does it matter as much?
I recall JPRG's do the opposite. Often main characters who seem young adults are are 16-17 years old, and older brother/father figures are either 21 or 27 years old. It doesn't bother me because I don't even look at that shite. They do it for stupid cultural reasons and because they think their main public are teens but for me it remains that they're only that age because somebody wrote that shit down because of marketing reasons.
Even in real life, we often treat people by how they behave and not for how old they appear to be. Henry behaves like a 17 year old or younger. An interview outside of the playable medium doesn't change anything, he could be 80 years old on the lore and that would change nothing.
If Henry is 27 it's the same as the JRPG example, someone with a pen and paper decided towards the end of development that it would be more marketable to the target public (which is probably 27 year olds, on average) if the character was their age. Nothing was changed story-wise where everything implies he is a 17 year old and is basically a load of crap.
Implications wouldn't be just for him, he grew up with Bianca and Theresa, so they would be 25-28 as well. Unmarried women that old in ancient times? Not likely. Mathias, Matthew and Fritz are more believable to be older.
Hans Capon is 15 years old. No way Henry is 27 so 12 years older than him for the developers who did and wrote the game.
That's not his argument.
It's deduction really. Doesn't make sense for the story for not one, not two but probably 100 reasons. So it's a discrepancy.
Which is what he and I are saying. If he is 27 it's a big discrepancy and you're better off ignoring it (or doubt it) because nothing else points towards that. It's not written anywhere in the game so why do we have to take into account some IGN interview to temper our enjoyment of a game and define the character as a retard instead of a kid and how that changes everything?
Who cares if he is a retard and some things are not factually 100% accurate in a game that actually made an effort to be accurate? Most games don't and are not burned at the stake for it.
The best part is they'd slap there fins together like trained seals then resume complaining about Rami Malek playing a PharoahI'm sure if Egypt developed a game with only black people the pushback would have been similar
It's one thing to intentionally make people a villain due to their race, it's fucking retarded to target a specific developer for lack of inclusion.
Can't wait for the first worldwide Arab developed AAA game, I'm sure it will be praised for its inclusion and fair treatment of jews
I'm still upset about lack of hispanic representation in ac origins tbh
I'm sure that LITERALLY EVERY 18-27 year old in these times adhered to your laundry list of requirements, especially the ones that are explicitly made out to be lazy like HenryEven if he is 16-18 years old, he should already be competent with a sword, bow or polearm.
He should already be proficient in blacksmithing, working with his father in the shop. Not doing errands.
With 16-18, he might not be doing swords for Lords. But he would be crafting agricultural implements, and even some armor and swords for low rank soldiers and peasants.
And considering that a blacksmith is a highly regarded craft in medieval times, when leaving for the second castle, he would be hired as one. Not as a mere patrol guard.
He would also know his place in society, that a commoner should not disrespect a Lord, let alone start a quarrel with him.
All these faults would only make sense if he was 13 or less. And even then, not much.
Kids were taught from a young age to respect their "superiors", especially the King, nobility and clergy. That a 16-18 year old would start a fight with a Lord is complete non-sense.
And that he would get away from it with almost no consequences is idiotic.
It's like the devs wanted to make him younger, and have him grow up, but didn't get the time and/or budget to make several models and hire more actors for it.
So they just crammed all together, with no regard for historical accuracy.
And yes, his age matters in a game that takes so much pride in historical accuracy.
At 16-18, lacking these skills and behaving like this are very weird flaws for a medieval character.
Remember that in medieval Europe, most kingdoms had rules for men to own their own gear and to practice a number of hours per week.
It doesn't make sense for a 16-18 year old to be completely untrained.
But at 27, it becomes a huge problem, as in this era this age would require a lot of responsibilities from every men in town.
A man, in a medieval town that has no combat skills, no trade and still lives with his parents, would be considered the town's fool.
He went from the 8.8 to ideological cuck in the span of a decade.One of the big reasons I stopped listening to Giant Bomb was when Gerstmann, with a straight face, claimed that they weren't going to cover this game due the audience having 'no interest'.
Puh-lease. The game is fucking great. We all know why GB didn't cover it.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/379430/discussions/0/3192489717252010538/?ctp=2Even if he is 16-18 years old, he should already be competent with a sword, bow or polearm.
He should already be proficient in blacksmithing, working with his father in the shop. Not doing errands.
With 16-18, he might not be doing swords for Lords. But he would be crafting agricultural implements, and even some armor and swords for low rank soldiers and peasants.
And considering that a blacksmith is a highly regarded craft in medieval times, when leaving for the second castle, he would be hired as one. Not as a mere patrol guard.
He would also know his place in society, that a commoner should not disrespect a Lord, let alone start a quarrel with him.
All these faults would only make sense if he was 13 or less. And even then, not much.
Kids were taught from a young age to respect their "superiors", especially the King, nobility and clergy. That a 16-18 year old would start a fight with a Lord is complete non-sense.
And that he would get away from it with almost no consequences is idiotic.
It's like the devs wanted to make him younger, and have him grow up, but didn't get the time and/or budget to make several models and hire more actors for it.
So they just crammed all together, with no regard for historical accuracy.
And yes, his age matters in a game that takes so much pride in historical accuracy.
At 16-18, lacking these skills and behaving like this are very weird flaws for a medieval character.
Remember that in medieval Europe, most kingdoms had rules for men to own their own gear and to practice a number of hours per week.
It doesn't make sense for a 16-18 year old to be completely untrained.
But at 27, it becomes a huge problem, as in this era this age would require a lot of responsibilities from every men in town.
A man, in a medieval town that has no combat skills, no trade and still lives with his parents, would be considered the town's fool.
The original idea was Henry is in teen age. Remember, that in medieval time you are taken almost adult in 14-16, helping with the work already from 10-12, some girls alraedy married in 15 etc. Of course the actor is older, the movements of the character scaned in the motion capture studio are "adult", so you have rather impression of a guy in twenties. But the idea was he is very young, uneducated, unexperienced teenager and before end of KCD he actually become a man, not aging of course, but in the similar way boys become men, rather inside. I hope I explained it little bit more :-] In the end, doesnt matter, the important is the emotional connection you get to Henry on his way, I believe.
Their assessment of what their audience is and isn't interested in, based on the views of a bunch of San Francisco left-wing gaming journalists seems to have turned out well for them.He went from the 8.8 to ideological cuck in the span of a decade.
Feels bad man.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/379430/discussions/0/3192489717252010538/?ctp=2
Check post 21. Developer himself says:
Teenager. Also of note, the real life person Henry is based on Jan Ptacek (Hans Capon) would have been 15/16 in 1403 and fictional Henry is noted as being "close" in age.
Warhorse have nothing to do with Switch version. They never even intended it. It was internally proposed by their sister studio Saber who ported Crysis to Switch and thought they could port Kingdom Come too.Honestly i would rather them develop and spend resources on the sequel rather than porting it for the Switch. But if they can do both they all the power to you, i just dont buy it, i think Switch audience is not really going to care that much about these kind of games, i would rather spend that power and money on a new game or a sequel.
Couldnt get into it too realistic for me. Its like a skyrim type game with survival elements. I guess you can say its a true roleplaying game.