Support NeoGAF

[Horseganador]

It depends on the game, in some it has been seen closer to Series S in dock mode and in others to a base PS4.

 

[Liopleurodon]

As someone who spent most of my gaming life on Playstation, and finished very few Nintendo titles, IMO, Zelda: BotW at 60fps on Switch 2 looks far more visually pleasant than 95% of stuff I've seen on PS4, and even PS5.

 

[Fake]

Is stronger or not doesn't make much difference to me, it doesn't change the fact its HUGE improvement over original Switch which what I was hoping for.

Only fanboys get triggred by that. For me, being like 10x better than the original Nintendo Switch is already a win.

I gonna get NS2 soon or later anw.

 

[Esppiral]

I mean... Street Fighter 6 uses PS4 settings and has the same 30fps lock in World Tour fights as PS4.
Series S is full 60fps and uses slightly higher settings.
Series S 1080p 60fps in WT Fights / Switch 2 720p 30fps in WT fights

Fortnite uses Lumen GI on Series S as well as Nanite. on Switch 2, no nanite no Lumen GI.

Hogwarts used 99% PS4 assets with slight modifications here and there, and has the same amount of load screens as PS4.

Cyberpunk runs lower res and half the framerate as Series S... half Series S performance is a bit above what you'd expect from a PS4...
Series S 800p~1080p 60fps / Switch 2 dynamic 720p 30fps and lower settings.

Go somewhere else with your facts, we want to believe the Switch 2 is a beast here.

 

[Kataploom]

Koei Tecmo: 'Switch 2 Is Closer to the Series S Than PS4' - yes in docked mode. The challenge for devs is how Switch 2 to not drain the batteries in 10 min.
So I expect a big differences between docked and handled modes. And that is costly - so less support for Switch 2 from big devs.

Like if this was a phone or handheld PC lol. The thing is designed for that, that's why it's not boosting full CPU/GPU clocks

 

[Kerotan]

Not exactly something to be proud of. The series S is a pathetic piece of hardware that should have never existed.

 

[Karim]

As someone who spent most of my gaming life on Playstation, and finished very few Nintendo titles, IMO, Zelda: BotW at 60fps on Switch 2 looks far more visually pleasant than 95% of stuff I've seen on PS4, and even PS5.

 

[LordOcidax]

Go somewhere else with your facts, we want to believe the Switch 2 is a beast here.

The Switch 2 is exactly what people with brain expected here…

 

[RoadHazard]

In pure GPU power it definitely isn't. But it's closer to an XSS than a PS4 in other ways.

 

[Kataploom]

Internal rendering resolution doesn't matter much when the output IQ outclasses the native res by a good margin.

Most PS4 games are not maintaining at the target resolution. CP2077 PS4 dropped to 720p in most of cases.

We are in the era of post processing/Machine upscaler and DLSS is sitting at the top of the hierarchy. DLSS version that Switch 2 is currently using by far producing much better visual clarity than PS4 version in all games.

Switch 2 DLSS low internal rendering resolution >> PS4 blurry native resolution.

There are many visual comparisons available on YouTube where Switch 2 version of games producing much better visual IQ than PS4 pro. PS4 is in another league below Switch 2.

Not too mention that every new gen isn't just raw power increases but also efficiency increases, mesh shader, direct GPU data I/O, VRS, etc. All of this is just efficiency tools to allow the consoles to punch above their weights, the fact that Switch 2 just have the biggest efficiency gain and the lowest quality loss (or arguably a quality gain) doesn't invalidate it using DLSS, PS4 Pro had CBR and current consoles can use FSR 2 and above.

Last gen consoles could also but they preferred not to because they don't have the minimum raw performance to make it worthy.

I mean, imagine if people downplay Doom or RDR2 performance because they can use Vulkan instead of brute forcing DX11 or DX12, or if people tried to downplay virtualized geometry as cheating instead of championing infinite handmade LOP meshes. LOL.