I saw this in theaters on opening day and it blew my mind. This film deserves the Academy Award of 1997-and this still holds up today. I didn't see many articles celebreating it's anniversary this year, but here's a good one:
Why LA Confidential is Hollywood's last great noir
ts appropriate that 1997's LA Confidential begins with the most cynical sales pitch committed to film:
u could even be discovered, become a movie star... or at least see one.Come to Los Angeles! The sun shines bright, the beaches are wide and inviting, and the orange groves stretch as far as the eye can see. There are jobs aplenty, and land is cheap. Every working man can have his own house, and inside every house, a happy, all-American family. You can have all this, and who knows...yo
Thats what they tell you anyway says Danny DeVito, to finish his voiceover. You dont need to know that hes playing a blackmail-fond showbiz hack to understand that the Californian glamour has to come at a price. It's money we've always been willing to put up, at least in fiction. Few places have so willingly basked in their shadow to tell exciting stories, and only LA can turn a profit on it. As a genre, noir could reach its potential without having to leave Los Angeles County.
We were already familiar with the city's underbelly thanks to adaptations of Raymond Chandler, and films such as Double Indemnity and In A Lonely Place. These films settled as a period between the 1920s and the 1950s, in time to be revisited in 1974 by Roman Polanskis Chinatown. Robert Townes script set the detective story against a background of the process through which Los Angeles became a modern city, with water crises and new immigrant populations. What could have been a simple pastiche exercise became something else, but still looked part of a tradition.
Even so, Chinatowns formula was difficult to replicate (as its own 1990 sequel demonstrated), or feel authentic and worthy of the period setting. As time went on, the concrete jungle offered new types of stories - riots and the crack epidemic instead of sleuthing and feel-bad romanticism.
Contemporary neo-noir was the closest descendant but its directors were determined to escape the LA of the past: Michael Manns Heat (1995) shot the city in a stark ahead-of-its-time manner, blues and greys and modern architecture. From the same year, David Finchers Se7en was filmed in LA, but its story kept the citys location anonymous for the purpose of atmosphere. There was no great demand for romanticism about Los Angeles, and even if there was, how much of the old city was available for filming? If that were possible, what was there left to express, beyond nostalgia?
The director Curtis Hanson was aware of this when he first became interested in adapting James Ellroys 1990 novel, LA Confidential. But the nature of modern Los Angeles acted not as a repulsing force, but as a reason for him to persevere.
While Chinatown had alluded to the social cost of turning LA into a modern city, Hanson believed the construction process was ongoing, and that Ellroys novel supported that view. Unlike any other metropolis, Los Angeles had a manufactured image...sent out over the airwaves to get everybody to come there.
People who fell for the siren song might have tolerated not getting talent-scouted, if they still got to live in prosperity in California; but as Curtis said, the truth of [the opening voiceover] was literally being destroyed to make way for all the people that were coming there looking for it. It was being bulldozed into oblivion.
And for so many people, that is when crime became a way out, or entered involuntarily into their lives. A message about the evolution of the American dream's Californian version would make old Los Angeles worth visiting again. LA Confidential would, Hanson hoped, show where the rot started.
Much of the films success was down to luck, and not even in a pejorative sense. Having to satisfy the visions of both the original author and Warner Bros before production was a challenge that could only reasonably be met with the assistance of good fortune. Luckily for Hanson, he was joined in assembling the script by Brian Helgeland. Helgelands enthusiasm for Ellroys crime novels had made him lobby his way into the job ahead of better-known screenwriters. Luckily again, both men agreed on how they should structure the story.
This confidence was going to be needed. Helgelands background was mostly in writing horror films, but making L.A. Confidential filmable would involve an even greater act of on-page dismemberment. James Ellroys novel was just under 500 pages, but it was not a regular 500. This was a writer who had once excised verbs from a manuscript to meet his publishers page limit; who referred to himself unironically as the greatest crime novelist of all time, and who threw adaptations of his work under the bus before they even entered production (see his dismissal of 2006s The Black Dahlia).
Though it took seven drafts for Hanson/Helgeland to feel it could be shown to Ellroy, they had not been afraid to do what was necessary to the source material. Of all the overlapping storylines, only those of the three protagonists remained. Their interplay was enough to have a sense-making narrative that retained the feel of the book and said what Hanson wanted to say about Los Angeles.
In the end, Ellroy gave the film his blessing (though he called the plans for a climactic gun battle bullshit... but inspired bullshit), understanding that there was only so much of his world that could be visited in two hours. Hanson and Helgelands cuts to the story were however matched by an addition that would be the reason for much of the movies fame, Rollo Tomasi: a name, a secret, heroic last words and the greatest film twist not involving parentage.
Despite the confidence with the script, Hanson still faced studio interference. Warner Bros were sceptical that an ensemble period film could work and wanted to amalgamate the protagonists, to make it a star vehicle in the least to stand a chance financially. The director persisted with his vision, but knew that with a budget as streamlined as his script, he would have to employ almost strategic casting.
Much more at the link-a great tribute to a masterpiece. And here's the original trailer (a very 90's trailer):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sOXrY5yV4g
And my favorite scene involving Russell Crowe and a chair:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-opqUSOUDQY