• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Late to the party: The Last Samauri and analysis of other 'cultural impact' films

Status
Not open for further replies.

Phoenix

Member
I just watched this movie on Comcast On Demand. I don't know why I never made it to see this one in theaters and I'm kicking myself for that (as even the best home theater can't compete with the big screen). This movie was actually very good - I enjoyed the entire thing. I never pay much attention to critics, but when this movie came out there were many people - especially here, with much hate for this movie and I just don't understand why. This was a good film. It was very 'personable' and while I'm sure its not accurate to the lifestyles of the Samauri or its portrayal of the modernization of Japan (though I have learned that some of the effects were actually like that), I have at least a bit more understanding of the death of the 'old ways' of a society that I respected very much.

And then it made me wonder - would there ever be a film of even THAT caliber about the people of Native America who were driven to what is best considered 'endangered society' status or of the peoples of Africa? It really made me think about how these two cultures of people are so neglected in their accurate portrayal on the big screen.
 

Amneziak

aka The Hound
The Last Samurai is a great film. Ken Watanabe and Hiroyuki Sanada are excellent and steal the show from Tom Cruise (Not to say he wasn't great--he was, though some of his dialogue is too modern). My only problem with the film is the "Hollywood" ending (at least the narrator states that know one knows for sure), though that's only a nitpick.

Now I'm dying to see The Twilight Samurai (starring Sanada), but I have yet to find it anywhere in San Diego.

If you haven't already, read Lone Wolf & Cub or Samurai Executioner. Each story explores a different aspect of old Japanese society and is very meticulously researched.
 

Vicious

Member
Phoenix said:
And then it made me wonder - would there ever be a film of even THAT caliber about the people of Native America who were driven to what is best considered 'endangered society' status

Dances with Wolves comes to mind.
 

Macam

Banned
I enjoyed The Last Samurai quite a bit despite the ending. It's well done and about as good as big budget Hollywood drama movies get. I think a large part of the reason I enjoyed it is simply because of the supporting actors more than anything, at least the Japanese ones; they did a great, great job and outshone everyone else. Not to mention Hans Zimmer does a fantastic job with the soundtrack.

Twilight Samurai is a good film that took me some time to absorb for some reason. It's definitely a more paced film than what one may expect from the title, but it's very well done. Amazon has it for $18 new (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00065GX0K/?tag=neogaf0e-20) which is cheaper than you'll find in retail stores, if you find it.
 

bionic77

Member
One of my favorite movies. I understand why some people couldn't get into it because when you know something of the actual history involved it is very hard to get involved into a movie. I feel that way about most portrayals of American history, but knowing nothing about Japanese history or its culture I could just watch it as a movie.
 

jenov4

Member
Great film, it deserved to do better at the box office. And I personally didn't mind Tom Cruise at all in this film.
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
This film would've been in my Top 20, easily.

But unfortunately, it had one of the worst endings ever. The ending ruined it. And I couldn't take it seriously afterwards. What a horrible, horrible ending.

And such promise that one of the best movie moments with...

NINJAS FIGHTING SAMURAI!

I was surprised that it wasn't just Dances with Samurai, but disappointed that Hollywood could ruin a film with that horrible ending.

Fuck you, Tom Cruise.
 

Mama Smurf

My penis is still intact.
I suspect he didn't like
that the guy who killed this woman's husband ends upw ith her.

Maybe I'm wrong though, that didn't bother me personally.
 

Rei_Toei

Fclvat sbe Pnanqn, ru?
That, and
Algren should have died with the rest. Another Samurai could have (and would have probably done a better job) delivering to the emperor
.

But besides that, awesome movie :). Beautiful scenery, altough a bit heavy on portraying an overly idyllic Japanese rural scenery/society.
 

Phoenix

Member
Rei_Toei said:
That, and
Algren should have died with the rest. Another Samurai could have (and would have probably done a better job) delivering to the emperor
.

But besides that, awesome movie :). Beautiful scenery, altough a bit heavy on portraying an overly idyllic Japanese rural scenery/society.

Nope. Any other samauri would have killed himself in defeat. Really, he is the only one that could have 'survived' the battle and 'lived' afterwards to do anything.
 

Rei_Toei

Fclvat sbe Pnanqn, ru?
Hmm, well,
you have a point, but maybe one would be captured or something.

And
why do you keep calling them samauri? :p
 

Boogie9IGN

Member
I loved it, but
Algren dying would have made it more dramatic or something. Then again the fact that he returned to the village was kind of nice.
 

ManaByte

Gold Member
Phoenix said:
That was purely an orgasmic experience. I went back to watch just THAT part of the movie :)

Yeah for the whole movie you're like "Hey this is a pretty good movie so far..." and when that part happens you're like
HOLY FUCKING SHIT NINJAS FIGHTING SAMURAI! HOLY FLAMING NINJAS BATMAN!
 

Dice

Pokémon Parentage Conspiracy Theorist
I loved all the fight scenes because they didn't seem choreographed. The people fighting seemed skilled, but they all had a very raw and desperate feel to them.

And I don't see a problem with the ending...
Nope. Any other samauri would have killed himself in defeat. Really, he is the only one that could have 'survived' the battle and 'lived' afterwards to do anything.
Yeah, and isn't that the point of the whole movie? They teach him how to live with honor and that saves him from his past and restores him to be a decent human being, and he teaches them the resilient tenacity that saves their culture in return for teaching him that. If he died then that would defeat their cause, disprove his lesson to teach them and killed off in him their lesson to pass on to him. And if they didn't die, their lesson of honor wouldn't have truly passed on to him, because it was a lesson of honor even unto death. And not only that, but death by his side because they accepted him as their own not because of blood but on the basis of that honor and character they passed on to him. His going back to the villiage is like the fulfillment of both of these lessons and the overall lesson of the common human condition beyond cultural differences.
Freakin' excellent movie.
 
Mama Smurf said:
I suspect he didn't like
that the guy who killed this woman's husband ends upw ith her.

Maybe I'm wrong though, that didn't bother me personally.


I guess you didn't like Samurai X Then right?
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
I thought it was lame as hell that
Algren lived
. Just atrocious. The movie nosedived hard for me when that happened. I just thought that was an awful happy Hollywood ending that lost everything it had been working towards.

Also, I liked this movie a lot better when it was called Glory. I think the director's done great work, but c'mon, several scenes were ripped straight from his earlier Glory and just transplanted them almost directly into The Last Samurai. Talk about being creatively bankrupt. There were just too many little scenes that were identical.
 

karasu

Member
It was a really fun watch, but the ending was full of sentimentality. Every ending was.
Algren living(but he was NOT the Last Samurai) , possibly ending up with the woman who's husband he killed, and the emperor suddenly realizing the error of his ways. All of that was pretty cheesy. Not all Samurai would have committed Seppuku.
 
The movie is a good Dances with Wolves clone. Not a "great movie" by any means, but well done. Ken was great, Tom was ok. Story was cool, cinematography was good. Nothin' groundbreaking or anything, and it's all been done before.

Samurai flicks? Kurosawa »»»» All.
 

karasu

Member
Foreign Jackass said:
The movie is a good Dances with Wolves clone. Not a "great movie" by any means, but well done. Ken was great, Tom was ok. Story was cool, cinematography was good. Nothin' groundbreaking or anything, and it's all been done before.

Samurai flicks? Kurosawa »»»» All.


Let's not forget Kihachi Okamoto. Everyone should go get Sword of Doom!
 

Rei_Toei

Fclvat sbe Pnanqn, ru?
True. Seven Samurai >>>> all. Although I can't precisely explain why I like the movie so much. I know it sounds stupid :).
 
The Ending with Cruise and the Emperor was REALLY FUCKING CHEESY! :lol

I was laughing at the melodrama there. Otherwise it was an awesome movie
 
karasu said:
It was a really fun watch, but the ending was full of sentimentality. Every ending was.
Algren living(but he was NOT the Last Samurai) , possibly ending up with the woman who's husband he killed, and the emperor suddenly realizing the error of his ways. All of that was pretty cheesy. Not all Samurai would have committed Seppuku.


I have never watched a movie where the Samurai didn't commit a
seppuku
.... they all do once they have been found guilty of something or thr wrongfullness of their ways.

The movie was pretty good and was perfectly told through the eyes of the narrator. Tom Cruise didn't
die because he wasn't a god damn samurai, he just happened to have had a changed of heart and had decided to join the samurai to rebel against the emperor

WTF is wrong with that?
 

jett

D-Member
The Last Samurai is an awesome movie, and I didn't have a problem with the ending. :p There's too much Cruisehating in this forum.
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
The problem with the ending is three fold...

1. The fact that the white guy (who has only had three months of samurai training, yet is magically the greatest samurai ever by the end of the film!) lives is absolutely retarded. What, did he have a bulletproof vest that the other samurai did not? Incredibly, incredibly lame. Everyone dies, he lives. Of all the fucking samurai, these people trained in the art of discipline and war, the white guy lives. What-fucking-ever. He wasn't even a fucking American super soldier, he was a lieutenant.

2. How come Tom Cruise throws a FUCKING sword like 100 feet through that asshole American general guy and kills him, but NOBODY THINKS TO DO THAT TO ASSHOLE JAPANESE TRAIN BARON GUY? Why? BECAUSE THE ENDING IS STUPID.

3. He ends up in the village, happily ever after? Oh it must be good times for everyone else, since all the men are DEAD and he's the only one who lived, not to mention he's banging the wife of the guy he killed in the beginning of the movie.

Worst. Ending. Ever.

Dan said:
I just thought that was an awful happy Hollywood ending that lost everything it had been working towards.

Bingo!

Also, I liked this movie a lot better when it was called Glory.

:lol

jett said:
The Last Samurai is an awesome movie, and I didn't have a problem with the ending. :p There's too much Cruisehating in this forum.

My disdain for the ending has nothing to do with Tom Cruise. I think he's a good actor, but that ending was horrible and it didn't matter who was playing the main character. It could've been Denzel or Tom Hanks or anyone, and if the ending was the same, it would still be one of the worst endings ever.
 

Dice

Pokémon Parentage Conspiracy Theorist
2. How come Tom Cruise throws a FUCKING sword like 100 feet through that asshole American general guy and kills him, but NOBODY THINKS TO DO THAT TO ASSHOLE JAPANESE TRAIN BARON GUY? Why? BECAUSE THE ENDING IS STUPID.
Hmmm.. Ok so I disagree with the other stuff but this is a good point.
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
Mama Smurf said:
Your first point should make you hate a hell of a lot more than just the ending.

I was kind of willing to let it slide because they never really had a side-by-side comparison making Cruise look as good as all the samurai. They sorta did it with the
ninja warefare omg!
and I was little peeved that Tom Cruise was able to dispatch them so easily, whereas fuckin' Ken Watanabe struggled. But the fact that we had
SAMURAI vs NINJA!
kind of made me not care as much as I should have.
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
Dances with Wolves is a better movie. And it's not cheap either. Nobody can really walk away from the ending feeling upbeat about the future of the main character or the people he spent time with.
 

Mama Smurf

My penis is still intact.
I just figure Tom Cruise's character is a natural, taught by the best. Saves a lot of hassle.

The film had a few humourous moments in too, which was nice as way too many films of this sort think you can't put anything funny in.
 

karasu

Member
norinrad21 said:
I have never watched a movie where the Samurai didn't commit a
seppuku
.... they all do once they have been found guilty of something or thr wrongfullness of their ways.

The movie was pretty good and was perfectly told through the eyes of the narrator. Tom Cruise didn't
die because he wasn't a god damn samurai, he just happened to have had a changed of heart and had decided to join the samurai to rebel against the emperor

WTF is wrong with that?


So only Samurai die in battle? That's absurd. To me it would have been great for a character who survived so much hell and so much that disgusted him to die fighting for something that he actually believed in. Living to give a speech that enlightens the emperor where all others have failed, and going to sleep with a woman who you made a widow, is too much.

As far as Seppuku, all samurai didn't believe in it. But in western films they can never stop talking about it. Too much hagakure
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
Mama Smurf said:
I just figure Tom Cruise's character is a natural, taught by the best. Saves a lot of hassle.

It is definitely one of those movies where you have to suspend disbelief, but you can only take it too far before it is ridiculous.

The film had a few humourous moments in too, which was nice as way too many films of this sort think you can't put anything funny in.

Having a drama with no laughter is stupid. Life is funny.

I'm with Dan, though. This movie had so much going for it, and it just falls apart at the end. And it really has nothing to do with Tom Cruise, but everything to do with the script and some extremely illogical storypoints.
 
karasu said:
So only Samurai die in battle? That's absurd. To me it would have been great for a character who survived so much hell and so much that disgusted him to die fighting for something that he actually believed in. Living to give a speech that enlightens the emperor where all others have failed, and going to sleep with a woman who you made a widow, is too much.

As far as Seppuku, all samurai didn't believe in it. But in western films they can never stop talking about it. Too much hagakure


So in your opinion a man achieving inner Peace is a sin, all men who have committed evil act

deserve to die? This i thread is turning into a Tom Cruise bashfast by the minute
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
norinrad21 said:
deserve to die? This i thread is turning into a Tom Cruise bashfast by the minute

Uh, where?

There's a difference between disliking what happens to Tom Cruise's character and Tom Cruise himself.

I don't see anyone really complaining about Tom Cruise.
 

Amneziak

aka The Hound
Willco said:
The problem with the ending is three fold...

1. The fact that the white guy (who has only had three months of samurai training, yet is magically the greatest samurai ever by the end of the film!) lives is absolutely retarded. What, did he have a bulletproof vest that the other samurai did not? Incredibly, incredibly lame. Everyone dies, he lives. Of all the fucking samurai, these people trained in the art of discipline and war, the white guy lives. What-fucking-ever. He wasn't even a fucking American super soldier, he was a lieutenant.

2. How come Tom Cruise throws a FUCKING sword like 100 feet through that asshole American general guy and kills him, but NOBODY THINKS TO DO THAT TO ASSHOLE JAPANESE TRAIN BARON GUY? Why? BECAUSE THE ENDING IS STUPID.

3. He ends up in the village, happily ever after? Oh it must be good times for everyone else, since all the men are DEAD and he's the only one who lived, not to mention he's banging the wife of the guy he killed in the beginning of the movie.

My disdain for the ending has nothing to do with Tom Cruise. I think he's a good actor, but that ending was horrible and it didn't matter who was playing the main character. It could've been Denzel or Tom Hanks or anyone, and if the ending was the same, it would still be one of the worst endings ever.

Good points, but...

1. He was already a good fighter, as shown before his capture when he killed Taka's husband. And as I said, the ending didn't thrill me either; but the story was ABOUT him, so if another character survived instead of him, it wouldn't make much sense storytelling-wise.

2. The only reason Algren could even reach Colonel Bagley is because Bagley arrogantly rushes in to meet the Samurai's final charge. Omura was hiding behind the machine guns.

3. Also as I said, at least the narrator says that no one knows what actually happened to him.

I hate having to defend contrivances that bother me too, but these rationalizations keep them from ruining what is otherwise a great movie.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
Willco said:
Are you laughing with me or at me for making the comparison to Glory? I kind of figure most people wouldn't see it - especially with the obvious comparison to Dances with Wolves - but having loved Glory for many years, I just saw way too many similarities and parallels with Glory, outside of the romance obviously. Everything from Algren training the Japanese army, Algren's personal issues with his actions to his slow social insertion into the samurai culture and even the concept of the climax is straight from Glory. Entire scenes and dialogue exchanges were all but lifted from Edward Zwick's first war epic.

Between the sampling of Glory to the utter meltdown at the end, this one really disappointed me.
 

karasu

Member
norinrad21 said:
So in your opinion a man achieving inner Peace is a sin, all men who have committed evil act

deserve to die? This i thread is turning into a Tom Cruise bashfast by the minute


What? I didn't say that. What do you mean Tom Cruise bashfest? He was fine as an actor. :/
 

Gorey

Member
The Hound said:
If you haven't already, read Lone Wolf & Cub or Samurai Executioner. Each story explores a different aspect of old Japanese society and is very meticulously researched.
Now we're talking. I've been reading LW+C over the course of the last year, slowly, trying to savor it. Amazing stuff. My only gripe is the format- I wish it was bigger, as my eyesight sorta sucks and the art begs to be appreciated. Oh well.

Oh, and I thought Last Samurai was great. For a hollywood samurai flick, I though it treated the material very respectably, and delivered the goods.
 

Dan

No longer boycotting the Wolfenstein franchise
The Hound said:
1. He was already a good fighter, as shown before his capture when he killed Taka's husband. And as I said, the ending didn't thrill me either; but the story was ABOUT him, so if another character survived instead of him, it wouldn't make much sense storytelling-wise.
But that's half the point. No one needed to survive for the film to make its point, or perhaps the point that should have been made. The whole thing with Algren surviving and then seeing the Emperor again was just a nonsensical and dumbed down way of telling stupid audience members exactly how they were supposed to feel about the movie. It was just lame catering to the lowest common denominator combined with the happy ending for the lead character. I mean, give me a break, did Shaw's death in Glory negate the film's themes? I don't think so. In fact, it made the film much stronger.

*I'm not bothering with spoiler highlights. It's a thread for analysis of the film. If you haven't seen the movie, there's no real reason to be in here unless you're looking to be spoiled.
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
Dan said:
Are you laughing with me or at me for making the comparison to Glory?

No, I'm laughing with you. It's the same director isn't it? Zwick or something? There are definite parallels not just to Glory, but other films as well. If it's done tastefully, as Tarantino does in every film he's ever made, it's fine, but the ending kinda ruined it for me.
 

Amneziak

aka The Hound
Dan said:
But that's half the point. No one needed to survive for the film to make its point, or perhaps the point that should have been made. The whole thing with Algren surviving and then seeing the Emperor again was just a nonsensical and dumbed down way of telling stupid audience members exactly how they were supposed to feel about the movie. It was just lame catering to the lowest common denominator combined with the happy ending for the lead character. I mean, give me a break, did Shaw's death in Glory negate the film's themes? I don't think so. In fact, it made the film much stronger.

I agree, I'm just trying not to let the ending ruin the rest of the film. He could have died, according to the narrator, just not on the battlefield. And it was Katsumoto's sacrifice, not Algren, that changed the emperor.
 

Phoenix

Member
Dan said:
I thought it was lame as hell that
Algren lived
. Just atrocious. The movie nosedived hard for me when that happened. I just thought that was an awful happy Hollywood ending that lost everything it had been working towards.

Also, I liked this movie a lot better when it was called Glory. I think the director's done great work, but c'mon, several scenes were ripped straight from his earlier Glory and just transplanted them almost directly into The Last Samurai. Talk about being creatively bankrupt. There were just too many little scenes that were identical.


I can't disagree with this more. WHile I'm a huge fan of the extremely excellent Glory movie as it is one of the most underrated movies of all time, you'd have to point out 'stolen scenes' for me.
 

Phoenix

Member
Willco said:
The problem with the ending is three fold...

1. The fact that the white guy (who has only had three months of samurai training, yet is magically the greatest samurai ever by the end of the film!) lives is absolutely retarded. What, did he have a bulletproof vest that the other samurai did not? Incredibly, incredibly lame. Everyone dies, he lives. Of all the fucking samurai, these people trained in the art of discipline and war, the white guy lives. What-fucking-ever. He wasn't even a fucking American super soldier, he was a lieutenant.

Actually he was a captain and 'billed' as one of America's best. Otherwise why would the Japaneese government be so intently interested in HIM?


2. How come Tom Cruise throws a FUCKING sword like 100 feet through that asshole American general guy and kills him, but NOBODY THINKS TO DO THAT TO ASSHOLE JAPANESE TRAIN BARON GUY? Why? BECAUSE THE ENDING IS STUPID.

Because it would be difficult for them to throw a sword several hundred yards and hit a guy who is up on the bluffs where the cannons are. That would be my guess ;)


3. He ends up in the village, happily ever after? Oh it must be good times for everyone else, since all the men are DEAD and he's the only one who lived, not to mention he's banging the wife of the guy he killed in the beginning of the movie.

This one I will grant you to a certain point. Since I don't completely understand the cultural aspects I don't know how realistic it would be for her to really accept the 'he did his duty, you did yours' thing. Perhaps it would have been better if they didn't show the scene with him coming to the village since it was supposed to be a 'speculative' ending according to the narrator.
 

Willco

Hollywood Square
He was hired as a "war hero".

Just so you know, there's a difference between a war hero and a great soldier. The two are not always, and quite often aren't, the same.

I concur that Tom Cruise's character was a good soldier by the description from early in the film, but - c'mon! - by the end of the film he was practically the Terminator. That whole scene is bullshit and it doesn't make any sense, no matter how you slice it.

And I don't think his
character living
is necessary for the film, at all. I would also be less critical if
he wasn't the ONLY samurai that lived
. The fact that that's the case is a slap in the face to all the damn samurai!

You mean Ken Watanabe, THE KING BADASS SAMURAI of ALL SAMURAI, dies and Whitey McWhite White lives?

I call bullshit!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom