Support NeoGAF

[peakish]

I'd personally recommend doing this instead:

Auto-apt uses apt-get to find and satisfy any dependencies. CheckInstall creates a deb and installs the program using the deb, allowing you to use apt-get later to remove it.

That's pretty cool, I've been thinking about looking for a program like checkinstall sometimes but never bothered.

 

[Error]

So I'm using Ubuntu in one of my PCs, and it works great. Except when I use NVIDIA drivers, I notice stuttering, and when playing vids the pc would freeze for some seconds (I can hear sound and all), this doesn't happen when I take out the NVIDIA drivers. Any reason for this?

is the video card too old or something?

 

[D-Pad]

Firstly, thanks to everyone for the replies!

To add a ppa in a terminal do:

sudo add-apt-repository ppa:sevenmachines/flash

sudo apt-get update

sudo apt-get install flashplugin64-nonfree

1st method didn't work (flash is still sped up), so I tried the second method and got errors:

terrel@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get purge flashplugin-installer
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
  lib32bz2-1.0 lib32ncurses5 nspluginwrapper ia32-libs libc6-i386 lib32gcc1
  lib32asound2 lib32z1 lib32stdc++6 lib32v4l-0
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  flashplugin-installer*
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 to remove and 13 not upgraded.
After this operation, 188kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y
(Reading database ... 162505 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing flashplugin-installer ...
Purging configuration files for flashplugin-installer ...
terrel@ubuntu:~$ sudo add-apt repository ppa:sevenmachines/flash
sudo: add-apt: command not found
terrel@ubuntu:~$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:sevenmachines/flash
Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /etc/apt/secring.gpg --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv 454FEDB228E1455D687C9CBE35DA01C261E46227
gpg: requesting key 61E46227 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com
gpg: key 61E46227: public key "Launchpad Default PPA" imported
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:               imported: 1  (RSA: 1)

terrel@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get update
Hit http://archive.canonical.com maverick Release.gpg                          
Ign http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ maverick/partner Translation-en       
Ign http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ maverick/partner Translation-en_US    
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick Release.gpg                              
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net/doctormo/wacom-plus/ubuntu/ maverick/main Translation-en
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net/doctormo/wacom-plus/ubuntu/ maverick/main Translation-en_US
Hit http://archive.canonical.com maverick Release                              
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security Release.gpg                   
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/main Translation-en   
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/main Translation-en_US
Get:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick Release.gpg [316B]                     
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net/sevenmachines/flash/ubuntu/ maverick/main Translation-en
Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net/sevenmachines/flash/ubuntu/ maverick/main Translation-en_US
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick Release                                  
Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick Release.gpg [198B]                 
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main Translation-en          
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main Translation-en_US       
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/multiverse Translation-en
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/multiverse Translation-en_US
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/restricted Translation-en
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/restricted Translation-en_US
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/universe Translation-en
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/universe Translation-en_US
Hit http://archive.canonical.com maverick/partner amd64 Packages               
Get:3 http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick Release [39.8kB]                       
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security Release                       
Get:4 http://dl.google.com stable Release.gpg [197B]                           
Ign http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main Translation-en          
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/multiverse Translation-en    
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/multiverse Translation-en_US
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/restricted Translation-en  
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/restricted Translation-en_US
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/universe Translation-en    
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/universe Translation-en_US 
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates Release.gpg                  
Ign http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main Translation-en_US       
Get:5 http://dl.google.com stable Release [1,347B]                             
Get:6 http://dl.google.com stable/main amd64 Packages [1,072B]                 
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/main Translation-en  
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/main Translation-en_US
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/multiverse Translation-en
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security/main Sources                
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/restricted Translation-en
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/restricted Translation-en_US
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/universe Translation-en
Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-updates/universe Translation-en_US
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick Release
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security/restricted Sources            
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security/universe Sources    
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security/multiverse Sources
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security/main amd64 Packages 
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security/restricted amd64 Packages
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security/universe amd64 Packages
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security/multiverse amd64 Packages
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick/main Sources                   
Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick/main amd64 Packages
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates Release
Get:7 http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick/main Sources [491B]
Get:8 http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick/main amd64 Packages [962B]  
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick/main Sources
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick/restricted Sources
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick/universe Sources
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick/multiverse Sources
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick/main amd64 Packages
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick/restricted amd64 Packages
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick/universe amd64 Packages
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick/multiverse amd64 Packages
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/main Sources
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/restricted Sources
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/universe Sources
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/multiverse Sources
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/main amd64 Packages
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/restricted amd64 Packages
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/universe amd64 Packages
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages
Fetched 44.4kB in 2s (18.3kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done

terrel@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install flashplugin64-nonfree
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package flashplugin64-nonfree
terrel@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install flashplugin64-nonfree
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package flashplugin64-nonfree

Restarted, tried again. Same thing.

Edit - Don't know how to fix that blank space in the code box... Sorry.

 

[itxaka]

Firstly, thanks to everyone for the replies!



1st method didn't work (flash is still sped up), so I tried the second method and got errors:


Restarted, tried again. Same thing.

Edit - Don't know how to fix that blank space in the code box... Sorry.

Yep, you are rigth. I had the same ppa but the packages don't appear on my apt-get...strange

Ok, you can always try this other method.

Open Synaptic package manager -> Configuration -> Repositories -> Activate partner repositories on the Other software tab

now on a terminal apt-get update && apt-get install adobe-flashplugin

Check if that works

 

[Angelus Errare]

So has any news come from that Linux conference in which they were attempting to create a appstore that works on all flavors? For linux it would be huge and would easily propel Linux to mainstream limelight. (I still prefer the old school method.)

 

[Vanillalite]

So has any news come from that Linux conference in which they were attempting to create a appstore that works on all flavors? For linux it would be huge and would easily propel Linux to mainstream limelight. (I still prefer the old school method.)

No news yet though I'm extremely intrigued. Hell if we just had .rpm .deb and .yum in a unified repository that would be ball'n!!!

 

[D-Pad]

Yep, you are rigth. I had the same ppa but the packages don't appear on my apt-get...strange

Ok, you can always try this other method.

Open Synaptic package manager -> Configuration -> Repositories -> Activate partner repositories on the Other software tab

now on a terminal apt-get update && apt-get install adobe-flashplugin

Check if that works

Sorry for the late response... For apt-update I get:

terrel@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get update
Hit http://archive.canonical.com maverick Release.gpg
Ign http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ maverick/partner Translation-en       
Ign http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu/ maverick/partner Translation-en_US    
Hit http://security.ubuntu.com maverick-security Release.gpg                   
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/main Translation-en   
Ign http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick-security/main Translation-en_US
Hit http://archive.canonical.com maverick Release  

[...]

Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/restricted amd64 Packages
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/universe amd64 Packages
Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com maverick-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages
Err http://dl.google.com stable Release.gpg            
  Something wicked happened resolving 'dl.google.com:http' (-5 - No address associated with hostname)
Ign http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main Translation-en
Ign http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main Translation-en_US
Get:1 http://dl.google.com stable Release [1,347B]
Ign http://dl.google.com stable/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex
Get:2 http://dl.google.com stable/main amd64 Packages [1,072B]
Fetched 2,419B in 10s (229B/s)     
W: Failed to fetch http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/Release.gpg  Something wicked happened resolving 'dl.google.com:http' (-5 - No address associated with hostname)

E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

Then...

terrel@ubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install adobe-flashplugin
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree       
Reading state information... Done
Package adobe-flashplugin is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

E: Package 'adobe-flashplugin' has no installation candidate
terrel@ubuntu:~$

 

[D-Pad]

Also, the whole Wacom Linux thing is seriously complicated, so I'm just going to hold off on that until I get a better grasp at this. I have no idea where to even start. Hehheheh

Edit - Whoops, meant to edit. :\

EDIT 2 - Still can't get the install to work... But now the flash apps are playing normal speed ( ), just with no sound.

 

[itxaka]

Also, the whole Wacom Linux thing is seriously complicated, so I'm just going to hold off on that until I get a better grasp at this. I have no idea where to even start. Hehheheh

Edit - Whoops, meant to edit. :\

EDIT 2 - Still can't get the install to work... But now the flash apps are playing normal speed ( ), just with no sound.

Strange, it appeared on my laptop it doesn't on my desktop?

Anyway, last try. Doenload ubuntu-tweak and install it from it. Easiest way to do it and it should work. Don't forget to install ubuntu-restricted-extras as well!


Edit: Now it has come back, and from the ppa:

itxaka@zeus:~$ sudo apt-get install flash
flashgot                 flashplugin64-installer  flashplugin-installer    flashplugin-nonfree      flashrom                 flashybrid               
itxaka@zeus:~$ sudo apt-get install flashplugin64-installer 
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias       
Leyendo la información de estado... Hecho
Paquetes sugeridos:
  firefox xulrunner-1.9 konqueror-nsplugins ttf-bitstream-vera ttf-dejavu ttf-xfree86-nonfree xfs
Los siguientes paquetes se ELIMINARÁN:
  flashplugin-installer
Se instalarán los siguientes paquetes NUEVOS:
 [B] flashplugin64-installer[/B]
0 actualizados, 1 se instalarán, 1 para eliminar y 0 no actualizados.
Necesito descargar 8206B de archivos.
Se liberarán 24,6kB después de esta operación.
¿Desea continuar [S/n]? s
Des:1 [B]http://ppa.launchpad.net/sevenmachines/flash/ubuntu/[/B] maverick/main flashplugin64-installer amd64 10.3.162.29-0ubuntu0~sevenmachines2 [8206B]

 

[D-Pad]

Strange, it appeared on my laptop it doesn't on my desktop?

Anyway, last try. Doenload ubuntu-tweak and install it from it. Easiest way to do it and it should work. Don't forget to install ubuntu-restricted-extras as well!


Edit: Now it has come back, and from the ppa:

itxaka@zeus:~$ sudo apt-get install flash
flashgot                 flashplugin64-installer  flashplugin-installer    flashplugin-nonfree      flashrom                 flashybrid               
itxaka@zeus:~$ sudo apt-get install flashplugin64-installer 
Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho
Creando árbol de dependencias       
Leyendo la información de estado... Hecho
Paquetes sugeridos:
  firefox xulrunner-1.9 konqueror-nsplugins ttf-bitstream-vera ttf-dejavu ttf-xfree86-nonfree xfs
Los siguientes paquetes se ELIMINARÁN:
  flashplugin-installer
Se instalarán los siguientes paquetes NUEVOS:
 [B] flashplugin64-installer[/B]
0 actualizados, 1 se instalarán, 1 para eliminar y 0 no actualizados.
Necesito descargar 8206B de archivos.
Se liberarán 24,6kB después de esta operación.
¿Desea continuar [S/n]? s
Des:1 [B]http://ppa.launchpad.net/sevenmachines/flash/ubuntu/[/B] maverick/main flashplugin64-installer amd64 10.3.162.29-0ubuntu0~sevenmachines2 [8206B]

Cool! So with Ubuntu-Tweak I was able to install flash! The videos now play at normal speed in both Firefox and Chrome but without sound. Is this a seperate issue? Thank you for the help, by the way.

 

[zoku88]

Dumb question, but are you sure chrome and firefox aren't muted by pulseaudio or something?



Tried gnome-shell for the first time in months. I like how they got rid of keeping those notify messages in the bottom bar. Something they need to fix is what happens when you right click on an icon down there. The bar itself overlaps the bottomost option (which is usually close). So, that's a bit annoying.

I also like how they changed displaying of workspaces (and that you no longer need to click a button to create a new workspace.

EDIT: Apparently mutter has problem with Steam of all things... lol

 

[cntr]

That's pretty cool, I've been thinking about looking for a program like checkinstall sometimes but never bothered.

This also may interest you.

 

[Vanillalite]

On a side note I must say thanks to all who have posted and used this thread! As we inch closer to a mega thread and 10 or 20 pages depending upon your settings on GAF it's just been a joy to post in.

I say this because I feel this thread is a TON different than many other linux threads or places on the web. Everyone always seems uber hardcore, standoffish, grumpy, wanting to help yet unwilling to actually help (odd I know), and very haterish on all things not the way they like or do things both outside of Nix with stuff like Windows and MS and even inside Linux with different distros and such.

I really feel this thread in particular has helped me and my love for GNU/Linux really grow and flourish. It's also an example of how things in the FOSS world should be done verses the way things normally come off IMO. The normal Linux hardcore might just be well to hardcore, and I think scare people off.

I just hope things like this thread seep into the average nix community and things take a change for the better. Thanks again everyone and happy computing no matter what device or OS you are using!

 

[Flying_Phoenix]

I found this awesome add-on to CompizConfig.

It's very easy to install and it works well for the most part.

I love it.

 

[Tworak]

ever any server talk in here or is it mostly ubuntu tech support?

 

[Flying_Phoenix]

ever any server talk in here or is it mostly ubuntu tech support?

From my observations people here primarily use Ubuntu, Arch, or Fedora.

 

[zoku88]

There's a couple of us who use Gentoo! (maybe as many as Arch people.)

I think there was some person using alpha Natty for a server (why you would want to use alpha software for a server, I do not know.)

You know, I'm not sure why I didn't think of this before. I usually multitasked while playing games by playing them in windowed mode. But I never realized that I could just use a different workspace for a full screen game and then just switch to another one for chatting/web browsing. Genius! >.>

 

[Vanillalite]

ever any server talk in here or is it mostly ubuntu tech support?

There are some people that use server stuff at work, but we mainly talk in here about our home solutions. I know a couple of people in the thread have mentioned they use centos at work.

 

[itxaka]

ever any server talk in here or is it mostly ubuntu tech support?

Not usually but we can talk about them

Actually trying a Red Hat server 6.1 beta only available for RHCEs. Seems that they are changing the subscription models to the RHN and the way they are gonna deliver and charge for it.

Just released a couple of hours ago, will update if I find something interesting but for the moment I can only see that as new.

 

[Ignatz Mouse]

I've been on the Mac platform for about 6.5 years now, and still not particularly missing Windows. However, I have Ubuntu on a couple of devices (netbook, old tablet) and I pretty much like it. Linux as a desktop OS has come a long way. So as my current Macbook ages and I consider replacing it, I am considereing jumping to Linux as my main platform.

I'm curious about other people's experience, particularly with:

Photo libraries/editors
Music management
Interfacing with iTunes libraries on other machines (is it even possible?)
Misc.

I don't game, and mostly I websurf and do office-y things. I do a little artwork, but I like Inkscape and I think I might be able to adapt to Gimp via Gimpshop. I do that stuff mostly on the old tablet anyway, which is already Linux.

I have zero fear about the overall OS stuff-- I switched to Mac in the firstplace because of the Unix-like underlayer and how that made my life easier.

Your stories?

 

[Vanillalite]

Photo management is perfectly fine as is music management.

I'm not a big itunes user though so I'm not sure how well that will go down in terms of interfacing with other comps and stuff.

I'd HIGHLY suggest downloading some isos and trying them out without installing. I love this feature about linux. You can just run as a live cd and test out your os.

I personally use this nifty usb creator that lets me put my isos on a usb stick to try, but it's windows and linux only it appears. Here is the link to Unetbootin anyways!

If you just want stuff to work IMO despite what the hardcore will tell you go with an easy distro. This means either Ubuntu or if not that go with an Ubuntu derivative like Linux Mint. Installing is easy, and you can get them to install all of the non foss codecs in the install so shit will just work like flash and mp3s.

If you go this route then you'll have full access to anything that runs on Ubuntu so basically anything that has a .deb extension which means basically any linux program is supported. Plus Ubuntu has it's big software center ala an appstore where you can just browse and download what you need.

That being said 3/4ths of the stuff I'd want is already preinstalled. My best friend switched full time on his laptop after not using linux since the ghetto linux 90s last Oct. because Vista just wasn't working out. He couldn't be happier, and his wife who's hardly comp savy does fine with it as well.

Firefox, Chrome, and Opera all work with flash, dropbox officially supports Linux, mplayer and vlc work on linux, and there are 4 or 5 big name audio players so you can find one you like. Only issue you'll have is if you use some kind of niche windows software or maybe are really use to some of Apple's own software included in say iLife.

The only thing that jumps out for normal users as a pain would be if you have an iphone or a wp7 device and need itunes or zune. You can get them to work, but I've personally never bothered with it so no clue how easy that is. I dual boot with win7 so not an issue for me.

 

[Ignatz Mouse]

I already have Linux installed (ubuntu) on two laptops-- it's just that I only use them for certain things. Right now, I'm trying out some of the apps I've always ignored. I'm wondering mostly if I could live without my Mac.

I do have an iPod, but I am not using much these days, using my phone instead. In that regard, I can whip up a simple rdist./rsync script to sync music to the phone, it's drag-and-drop. I'm wondering how the management it. I really like Foobar on Windows a few years ago.

I have no worries for browsing and Office.

I would like to be able to share/snag music from other computers, though I suppose I might have to do that via fileshare. I like the iTunes function of being able to copy music across computers. I have a Mac in my entertainment center that's the main music library.

I'm also going to have to give Gimpshop a run.

Also, I'm interested in whatever WINE has evolved into-- does it still exist? Does it work? I would probably like to run the odd Windows app now and then, without having to fire up in dual-boot mode or running a whole virtual machine.

 

[Ignatz Mouse]

I also have a scanner I use sometime, don't know what's available to drive that. But that's infrequent, I suppose I could just use the Mac from time to time.

 

[Vanillalite]

Wine is still there and still constantly being worked on as well as just virtualbox if you want to virtualize windows or something.

If you want to share music you could always just dropbox music on over.

I'm sure you can probably use wine and run itunes I'm just not sure how well it runs and if all of the features work.

 

[Ignatz Mouse]

Wine is mostly for Battleplanner, a collecatble game database. It works "OK."

Dropbox will require a step-- I'm going to see if I can set up a share of some sort that goes straight to the library.

Anyway, this is kinda fun-- I've had my netbook for 9 months or so but used it mostly as a portable internet tablet/MAME box-- exploring apps is fun.

 

[Vanillalite]

With FF4 going into RC do we know if FF4 will make it into the next versions of both Fedora and Ubuntu?

 

[Flying_Phoenix]

When I watch some Flash videos I get white bars flickering on the video.

Anybody else have this problem?

 

[zoku88]

Also, I'm interested in whatever WINE has evolved into-- does it still exist? Does it work? I would probably like to run the odd Windows app now and then, without having to fire up in dual-boot mode or running a whole virtual machine.

I use wine for games all of the time. Works well for about 70% of them. I think newer software tends to run better than older software. (Run better meaning more accurately.)

There's actually a wine app database.

http://appdb.winehq.org/

So you can check.

 

[DUFFMCWALIN]

Get vim if Ubuntu doesn't have that by default, and then do all of your programming in it

OMGUbuntu.co.uk has a lot of tips, news and programs and it's updated daily. Great resource.

Cool thx guys! I have vim and I am going to start to learn how to use it. Seems so fast and straight forward but with a learning curve.

 

[Vanillalite]

When I watch some Flash videos I get white bars flickering on the video.

Anybody else have this problem?

What browser? What version of Flash? What video drivers?

 

[Ignatz Mouse]

So, my story continues.

As an experiment, I'm leavign my Macbook aside most of the time, seeing what it feels like to just stick to the Netbook.

Music management seems like it will not be an issue, and of course, libraries of stuff will need to be moved over if I stick with this.

After some software installs and some customizations, I really like the environment. My biggest issues are the netbook itself, with it's less-than-stellar trackpad and small screen.

One question-- I rely heavily on Spotlight to launch software and find files-- what is a good replacement? I've tried Google Desktop in the past, any others?

Also, I don't really use desktop widgets, but it there an option for me if I did? Again Google, or something else?

 

[Vanillalite]

Download Docky...

It's a desktop dock that also has search built in both local and online!

 

[Flying_Phoenix]

What browser? What version of Flash? What video drivers?

- Firefox 4 and well really any
- The latest version of Flash
- I have the following video card: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)

 

[Ignatz Mouse]

Download Docky...

It's a desktop dock that also has search built in both local and online!

Only if I can hide it and pull it up with a hotkey. I don't like docks. I hide the dock on my mac and never no use it.

 

[Vanillalite]

Only if I can hide it and pull it up with a hotkey. I don't like docks. I hide the dock on my mac and never no use it.

Not sure about the hotkey, but I know you can set it to autohide. Just a thought. LOL

 

[Ignatz Mouse]

I just grabbed Google Desktop. Not as slick as Spotlight or Quicksilver, but does the job.

edit: and then I found Gnome Do, which is even better.

 

[itxaka]

Cool thx guys! I have vim and I am going to start to learn how to use it. Seems so fast and straight forward but with a learning curve.

If you get more curious and start doing more advanced things in linux, howtoforge.com has loads of tutorials on everything. From a perfect server setup to vmware server and bind. It an incredibly resource when you strat doing more production work in linux, related to servers and such or even if you only want to setup a simple proxy-cache or a software firewall for your home network.

edit: and then I found Gnome Do, which is even better.

gnome-do is godly. Super+space bar has become the most used shortcut for my pc. Also it has a docky theme that makes it work as a dock. Fun fact, docky standalone came from this gnome-do theme, people thougth it was so awesome that they separated them in order to exploit their own strenghs instead of having a do it all mixed launcher/dock.

 

[Withnail]

I'm sure this has been discussed a lot but what music players do people use? I'm running Ubuntu and have tried a few but always go back to Rhythmbox for the tight integration with Gnome, however I don't feel completely satisfied with it as I think the UI is pretty ugly and it lacks some advanced features related to tagging and so on. Actually I miss Foobar 2000 from Windows and I'm thinking about maybe trying to get it running in Wine.

BTW I tried Foobnix which is supposed to be a Linux equivalent of Foobar but I didn't think it was very good at all.

 

[dude]

I use Banshee, It's not perfect, but it does the job for me...

 

[Withnail]

I use Banshee, It's not perfect, but it does the job for me...

I haven't tried Banshee but it looks quite interesting, I will give it a go tonight, cheers.

 

[Dimmuxx]

I'm sure this has been discussed a lot but what music players do people use? I'm running Ubuntu and have tried a few but always go back to Rhythmbox for the tight integration with Gnome, however I don't feel completely satisfied with it as I think the UI is pretty ugly and it lacks some advanced features related to tagging and so on. Actually I miss Foobar 2000 from Windows and I'm thinking about maybe trying to get it running in Wine.

BTW I tried Foobnix which is supposed to be a Linux equivalent of Foobar but I didn't think it was very good at all.

Audacious, it's like winamp.

 

[-KRS-]

Yeah I also use Audacious. But it may not be what you want since it doesn't support tags or have things like a media library or such things. It's just a basic music player. But it plays pretty much everything and is easy to use.

I don't use the winamp interface though. It has support for Winamp 3.x skins but I use the regular GTK UI.

 

[Threi]

Exaile and Amarok are good as well.

 

[Vanillalite]

I haven't tried Banshee but it looks quite interesting, I will give it a go tonight, cheers.

Banshee is taking over the default role in Ubuntu 11.04 as well so it'll be "tightly" integrated into the next version.

PS: Funny I almost recommended Gnome Do in my above post but recommended Docky instead. LOL

 

[Red]

I'm sure this has been discussed a lot but what music players do people use? I'm running Ubuntu and have tried a few but always go back to Rhythmbox for the tight integration with Gnome, however I don't feel completely satisfied with it as I think the UI is pretty ugly and it lacks some advanced features related to tagging and so on. Actually I miss Foobar 2000 from Windows and I'm thinking about maybe trying to get it running in Wine.

BTW I tried Foobnix which is supposed to be a Linux equivalent of Foobar but I didn't think it was very good at all.

Guayadeque for me.

 

[-KRS-]

If you really wanted to you could use Audacious + Methlab.
It's a simple stand-alone music-library that can open the files in a variety of different music players. I've tried it myself and it does what it says, but I never really liked having my music organized in media-libraries in general so I never use it anymore.

 

[Schlep]

I've been on the Mac platform for about 6.5 years now, and still not particularly missing Windows. However, I have Ubuntu on a couple of devices (netbook, old tablet) and I pretty much like it. Linux as a desktop OS has come a long way. So as my current Macbook ages and I consider replacing it, I am considereing jumping to Linux as my main platform.

About the same here. I've been on Mac since about this time in '99. I ran Ubuntu starting with 8.10 for about a year, but never as a replacement, and it was off of what was once a pretty impressive gaming PC that's gigantic and now has a dead PSU.

I'm becoming very frustrated with Apple's increasing prices. At one point I had a G4/400 PowerMac and used the hell out of that thing. It was the entry level pro machine, and back then it was $1799. The entry level pro machine now is $2499...yeesh. iMac isn't really an option for me as I don't want to pay for a monitor when I already have one, and the Mac mini is the red headed step-child of the Mac family. Anyways...

I'm curious about other people's experience, particularly with:

Photo libraries/editors
Music management
Interfacing with iTunes libraries on other machines (is it even possible?)
Misc.

Can't really help you with photo apps, although I know there's no shortage of them. For music, I also prefer Banshee. It has an iTunes feel to it, along with a rating system and smart playlists, and built-in syncing for Android and access to the Amazon MP3 Store. I'm not sure how integrated it is with the OS since I haven't used Ubuntu in a bit over a year now. For syncing with other libraries back then, I stored the music on my NAS and gave both comps rights over NFS, which worked great. This time around I'll probably just store everything on the Ubuntu box, though. All it takes is one brain fart to wipe out files forever on a non-RAID1 NAS.

I have zero fear about the overall OS stuff-- I switched to Mac in the firstplace because of the Unix-like underlayer and how that made my life easier.

Your stories?

I think there's definitely a bit more involved in maintaining an Ubuntu box than a Mac. On the Mac, you hit software update and that's pretty much it. On Ubuntu, you might have to drop to the command line from time to time to update video drivers and whatnot. Nothing too terrible, but not the "it just works" experience of the Mac.

On the other hand, the box that I'm looking at building is quite a bit faster than the Mac mini. The CPU alone benches almost twice as fast, nevermind the dedicated vid card. And I'm talking $600 or so shipped with maybe an hour's worth of work putting it together.

I enjoy the feel of Ubuntu, as it is very Mac-like, and the speed/cost savings are hard to ignore. I'm anticipating the MBP announcements on Thursday to see what the 13" will look like, as that's probably what the mini will end up being. Short of an i3, I think my Mac experience for at least the next year will be relegated to iPad syncing duty.

 

[Vanillalite]

In recent editions of Ubuntu never had to go to the command line for anything in regards to general OS usage or updates. Plus you can just search for the non installed drivers and boom my ATI drivers come up.

Command line is a non factor for me except when I am trying something that I'd consider outside of the box.

 

[Schlep]

That's good to hear and makes me all the more excited about jumping back in, short of an Apple miracle on Thursday. Every kernel update I was having to drop to the CLI and re-compile the stupid nVidia drivers. That was honestly the only complaint I ever had about my experience. Ubuntu's just a solid OS.

 

[Flying_Phoenix]

About the same here. I've been on Mac since about this time in '99. I ran Ubuntu starting with 8.10 for about a year, but never as a replacement, and it was off of what was once a pretty impressive gaming PC that's gigantic and now has a dead PSU.

I'm becoming very frustrated with Apple's increasing prices. At one point I had a G4/400 PowerMac and used the hell out of that thing. It was the entry level pro machine, and back then it was $1799. The entry level pro machine now is $2499...yeesh. iMac isn't really an option for me as I don't want to pay for a monitor when I already have one, and the Mac mini is the red headed step-child of the Mac family. Anyways...

Apple replaced the pro line from prosumers to professionals. The Mac Pro's are workstation computers. Apple's putting its design price/performance brawn on their laptops and with the new Macbook Air it shows.

The highend prosumer market simply wasn't enough to justify the development nor does it fit into Apple's current philosophy.