-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Love Boat [Mafia] |OT| Till Death Do Us Part
- Thread starter Burbeting
- Start date
I'm picking nits here but I could see bolded being an out in case this vote goes poorly. Like, "oh, now that I understand how the tracking aspect of their role could help town I take back my decision to policy lynch all millers."
And that thinking feels slightly reinforced by Flame saying "if we all agree" they will rescind the vote. Personally if I was policy voting someone I am going to do it whether or not people agree with me, you usually policy vote because you feel strongly about something.
Yes, last game before Season 5. Total madness, full on bastard 11/10. Inception game in a game. Ghosts giving out power roles to living people. Medium roy. The most insane Day 1 shenanigans, while no role was actually given out. Kingkitty immortal winning ghostbuster, and so on and so on.
Moderator: Splinter
This game was very... special. It has absolutely zero significance as a comparison when it comes to power roles in a normal game.
It was very entertaining to watch from the sidelines, I loved it. But Splinter of all the people knows how to rate this unique experience and consequently about the validity of his argument above.
I'm doing it right now and there isn't much agreement that I can tell. However I also think that it is pointless if I'm the only one on the lynch train. If consensus is that we'll address Blarg Day 2/3/4 or whenever, then I'll wait till then and then try and lynch the miller. I get what you are pointing out, but in a game where it probably will take around 10 or 12 votes to lynch someone, if that level of support isn't there right now, I'd rather come back to him later. After all, we do need a Day 1 lynch to start working on player trends, I mentioned that in my first post, though no one seemed to address No Lynch V Lynch. (I'm strongly for lynch)
I don't know whether Flux is telling the truth or not, but I'll just say from my limited experience in Gafia game's that premise doesn't really hold true. Having a miller does mean there is at least one alignment cop, but it doesn't preclude there also being a role cop. Granted my two large games may have been the ones that were a little....looser with roles and powers (Harry Potter and Volcano Island).
If Flux/Time can provide me and Blarg's actual name, then I think there are two cops for town, one alignment and one name. Which is good news given the...strange approach our name cop took.
rest & karu (1)
fluxwavez 257
launchpadmcq & gorlak (0)
cabot 264 (372)
*splinter & cabot (1)
kingkitty 267 (386
gorlak 401)
timeaisis & fluxwavez (2)
coppanuva 279
*splinter 295 (297)
*splinter 301 (387)
camjo-z 319
blargonaut & kawl_usc (1)
flame_ac 353
kingkitty & hyperactivity (1)
hyperactivity 373
el topo & mirarcle (1)
cabot 388
coppanuva & flame_ac (1)
batsnacks 393
16 Votes Needed for Majority
fluxwavez 257
launchpadmcq & gorlak (0)
*splinter & cabot (1)
gorlak 401)
timeaisis & fluxwavez (2)
coppanuva 279
camjo-z 319
blargonaut & kawl_usc (1)
flame_ac 353
kingkitty & hyperactivity (1)
hyperactivity 373
el topo & mirarcle (1)
cabot 388
coppanuva & flame_ac (1)
batsnacks 393
16 Votes Needed for Majority
I meant it more as a joke, hence the "I don't know if that's for or against your claim though"
I expect Burb to have much saner roles
Flux, I can't really see why you wont disclose why Timeaisis didn't agree with this roleclaim (and why you'd do it anyway). You both have the same exact role and alignment.
You're just stalling.
The fact that you did this hot out the gate without any provocation also tells me that this was planned well in advance.
You're just stalling.
The fact that you did this hot out the gate without any provocation also tells me that this was planned well in advance.
Wait, what do you mean I won't disclose why Timeaisis didn't agree with it? No one asked. Of course he wouldn't agree with it, why would anyone sane want to claim a role minutes into a game? Especially since we have a PR, he wanted to lie low, and not be thrust into the spotlight.
Of course this was planned in advance; we have our own private chat, don't we? I talked about the plan in there; how else would I know Time didn't agree with it? It didn't happen after the fact.
I'm going to take this comment and use it to address 2 things here:
1) My vote is fluid. I'm not a player who typically votes on one person and leaves it there. I use my vote to get answers to questions I have and address issues. If someone doesn't answer me, I consider it anti-town. You can read my vote as an early pressure vote if you want. I do, however, want to ask Flux one more question, then it'll probably move on to its new home.
2)This speaks more to what you're trying to imply in the above rather than anything concrete: How is it that a pair splitting their vote early on is considered unusual? We're partners, but we DO have separate votes and we are in no way forced to vote for the same person. Dividing our votes out just gives us more investigative room and allows us to pressure people more easily. If a pair both comes to wildly different conclusions by the end of the day and each votes on wildly different targets, I'd be a bit more concerned. Early in a phase? Not in the least.
That said, I want to see how Flux and Time react to Blarg and Kawl. Flux: You've posted since yet avoided talking about them and their claim. What's your take on this situation?
Yes they did.
I mean I find it quite funny that you gave no fucks about his opinion and put a target on yourselves, but now when asked to explain Time's side of the story, you don't want to step on his toes?
Didn't expect another early role claim. I don't like how Kawl attaches it to us and claims that it's to corroborate our role.
I wanted to edit that in, actually, since I realized that's what you were talking about. "How against it was he?" How am I supposed to answer that, I'm not in Time's head. Ask him; he'll tell you the extent of how against it he was.
When it's something actually concrete like what you were asking, I can definitely answer that because there is no subjectivity.
So what you're saying is that I should have ignored Coppanuva's question. Got it.
Just to clarify, me and blarg were coming out at the start regardless. Your claim just provided an additional opportunity to try to get something worthwhile out of a semi anti-town role.
Being able to corroborate your claim is a bonus, not the reason for our claim.
Not in Time's head? You have a private chat with him, and he presumably had at least more than a few words to say about the "let's roleclaim cop 6 minutes into the game" idea. You actually have a written record of how against it he was.
Nope, he actually had very little to say about the plan and I don't even know the extent of how against it he was.
LaunchpadMcQ
Banned
I find it odd how little regard was given to Time in this situation, I hope he shows up sometime soon so we can hear what actually went on. Flux, you keep on giving dodgy answers. You seem to not want to speak for your pair, but yet you're clearly the one at the front, so you have to just answer for the both of you.
What dodgy answers? What do you want to ask? LITERALLY the only thing I'm not addressing is how against it Time was because I don't even know; we haven't posted too much in the private chat yet.
Could you answer:
Do you believe Blarg/Kawl? Why/Why not?
Are you considering checking their name as they seem to be suggesting for you to do?
Why did you do the role claim other than to get reactions, which you could have done on Day 2?
Are you pro lynch Day 1? (Totally should be)
???
Where's the contradiction? What are you even trying to point out anymore?
1. Time was against it.
2. I don't know how much Time was against it.
Here, let me check the number of replies that's in our private chat between me and Time: 12. We didn't even start posting in that thread until February 12.
And yet you decided to roleclaim Cop?
lol...
Alright, Flux. Let me tell you what I think.
You don't care that Timeaisis is currently available, because you have other scum friends who can vouch for you right now. "Role Cop" is an easy claim to fake as scum. Scum may very well even have a Role Cop of their own to help your claim. Your role is probably low on the scum totem pole, or you have something that activates reactively.
1. I don't know if I believe them. They claim that their plan was to role claim early due to their power role, and that mine made the situation more appropriate for it. Not enough to go by to say either way.
2. Sure, we could do that if we survive D1.
3. This was gone over a bit before, but it was primarily to give us something to talk about and to gauge certain reactions. Better than having empty conversation, and ending up lynching a townie power role anyways.
4. Of course.
VOTE: Karkador
The last time I had someone try to call me out with nonsense that wasn't actually a contradiction but a slip-up on the part of the person doing the calling out, they turned out to be Mafia (Ourobolus in Heist).
Rest
All these years later I still chuckle at what a fucking moron that guy is.
Role claiming day one, post one? Not acceptable. Demanding a policy lynch on this fool and his partner.
Vote: Timeaisis & FluxWaveZ
I specified in my very first post. We see role names.
Rest
All these years later I still chuckle at what a fucking moron that guy is.
Where the fuck did you guys did a second Blargonaut out from?
One is entertaining, I'm not sure I can handle two.
He said he doesn't see alignments, others jumped to name and I'd like Flux to clarify
Since you seem to be in thread Rest, could you provide your thoughts on what is going on. Specifically the Flux situation and then Blarg/Kawl?
I know you don't, but apparently you've been voting and unvoting us several times without even knowing what you were voting about.
Is it too late to change partners?
I'm all seriousness, this "plan" was briefly mentioned by Flux in our chat yesterday but I did not have get a chance to say whether or not I was cool with it. Like I said, I'm out of town today. I'm just as blindsided by this claim as the rest of you guys.
I'm all seriousness, this "plan" was briefly mentioned by Flux in our chat yesterday but I did not have get a chance to say whether or not I was cool with it. Like I said, I'm out of town today. I'm just as blindsided by this claim as the rest of you guys.
LaunchpadMcQ
Banned
Flux has said several times now that you were not, in fact, "cool with it"
Sorry about what's happened, can you at least verify what he's claiming?
Still going back and forth between options B and C. I hope for all our sakes it isn't A