Ghosts are confirmed as the WU tribe.Ghosts are W/U. Well, they actually show up in all five colors but theyre concentrated in white and blue. What tribe is left for white and green? Talk amongst yourselves. I will say that it will make a lot of sense when you hear it.
Kurtofan said:Ghosts are confirmed as the WU tribe.
Personally I'd say humans.Enordash said:Nice nice. So what does everyone think the GW one is?
Kurtofan said:Personally I'd say humans.
Monster hunters, pitchfork carrying townsfolk, witch hunting clerics.
White definitely, but green? Green is opposed to black and blue because it doesn't like black's selfishness and it doesn't like blue's desire to interfere in the natural order. So yeah that places green pretty diametrically opposed to zombies and vampires but what about other kinds of monsters? Werewolves and more "natural" monsters.Enordash said:From what I've seen, I'd have to agree. They seem to fit GW pretty well, and it just seems right for the story.
Zeke said:I want to make a vampire deck but a lot of vampire cards are rares or mythic rares and some of the prices on those cards suck ;(
as of now I have the following vampire cards
vampire lacerator
bloodthrone vampire
Bloodrage vampire
malakir bloodwitch
anowon, the ruin sage
I also threw in blood tribute, repay in kind, and haunting echoes. I really want a few kalastria highborn's and a captivating vampire cards but fuck those are between 5 and 6 bucks. Also wanted to throw some vampire nighthawks in there. Anyone have some recommendations on putting a vampire deck together?
Do you think you'll use Jace more then Chandra? I think Firebrand is better in Limited formats and/or as a splash.Zaraki_Kenpachi said:Someone wants to trade their Jace Memory adept for my Chandra Firebrand straight up. Do you guys think I should do it?
I tend to play casually the same way as you do. That's one reason why Commander is such a great format.ajf009 said:so i typically just play with my brothers and a couple friends and my decks are made out of cards from so many different sets. I was wondering if most of you play like this as well or do you only play using recent cards like standard format?
The_Technomancer said:Do you think you'll use Jace more then Chandra? I think Firebrand is better in Limited formats and/or as a splash.
ultron87 said:Split a big box of M12 boosters with two friends. Got a nice big pile of boring crap.
Other friend got a Chandra, a Furyborn Hellkite and a Primeval Titan.
And since this was our "start playing Magic again" plan I just have a few random things to make my boring white/green intro deck slightly better.
Same. It makes things horribly imbalanced, but it is great fun.ajf009 said:so i typically just play with my brothers and a couple friends and my decks are made out of cards from so many different sets. I was wondering if most of you play like this as well or do you only play using recent cards like standard format?
ajf009 said:so i typically just play with my brothers and a couple friends and my decks are made out of cards from so many different sets. I was wondering if most of you play like this as well or do you only play using recent cards like standard format?
Leunam said:My friends and I play like this but we do use ban lists.
r - b - x said:i've seen it in a few decklists now, but what's with people splashing inkmoth nexus into decks that aren't infect focused? is to ram into and weaken flyers? because sacrificing a land for that seems like a pretty heavy price for that.
Kurtofan said:Personally I'd say humans.
Monster hunters, pitchfork carrying townsfolk, witch hunting clerics.
Okay for those that have to have me actually say it - Humans are the GW tribe.
Brettison said:So I have a n00b question that is probably gonna be dumb, but whatever.
Like all games such as this I wonder... what's everyone's stance on who goes 1st? Does going 1st give you an inherent advantage or does it not really matter?
Depends on the deck you're playing for me. If I'm running a fast game I'll almost always take the play because I want to be a turn ahead on my 1, 2 and 3-drops. If I'm running a slower deck then the single card advantage of drawing can be useful.Brettison said:So I have a n00b question that is probably gonna be dumb, but whatever.
Like all games such as this I wonder... what's everyone's stance on who goes 1st? Does going 1st give you an inherent advantage or does it not really matter?
ajf009 said:That's interesting. why?
Brettison said:So I have a n00b question that is probably gonna be dumb, but whatever.
Like all games such as this I wonder... what's everyone's stance on who goes 1st? Does going 1st give you an inherent advantage or does it not really matter?
Brettison said:So I have a n00b question that is probably gonna be dumb, but whatever.
Like all games such as this I wonder... what's everyone's stance on who goes 1st? Does going 1st give you an inherent advantage or does it not really matter?
An-Det said:General rule of thumb for me has been to go first in constructed (unless I'm playing dredge), and to draw first in limited (unless I'm playing a very aggressive deck).
Not a whole lot. Mindslaver had to have a "no mana burn" clause when that was still relevant, but its not anymore.ultron87 said:So I bought some more M12 boosters and got a Sorin. Are there any horribly malicious things you can do while controlling someone's turn that isn't immediately apparent?