ComputerMKII
Banned
Fillon just stated that the commitee's decision (to declare Copé winner of the election) was 'illegal'.
Fillon just stated that the commitee's decision (to declare Copé winner of the election) was 'illegal'.
![]()
I'm in awe at the resounding success of conservative parties hijacking the idea of what is to be a "centrist", when the reality is that their positions are getting increasingly rightist and the mainstream parties on the left are going through some serious identity crisis after realising that they pushed themselves into the same place where old school conservatives used to be, barring a few points like social issues.
We are slowly reaching Fox News levels of delusion.
Nah, that's science fiction. Anyway, there won't be an election before 2014, lots of things can happen till then.UMP imploding + Hollande getting eroded in the goverment due to the crysis = FN winning an ellection
If the center-right in Italy actually goes through their "primaries" (as it seems), I expect it to be 1000x as lulzworthy.
I await Berlusconi's triumphant return to politics.
This is only happening in the US. The Spanish center is far, far at the left of Germany's, England's or France's
http://www.france24.com/en/20121126...d-winner-ump-leadership-battle-fillon-sarkozyThe UMP's internal Electoral Appeals Commission announced that the outspoken Copé, 48, had won the battle to become president of the UMP by 952 votes over his fierce rival Francois Fillon, 58. Around 173,000 votes were cast in total.
(...)
Fillon, who has questioned the impartiality of the appeals commission, ignored Copés call for "forgiveness", labelling the commission's confirmation on Monday as an illegal power grab.
According to his spokesman Jerome Chartier, Fillon, who had been favourite to win the election, expects a new leadership ballot to be held. His inner circle are set to meet on Tuesday to decide their next move.
This is only happening in the US.
Nah, that's science fiction. Anyway, there won't be an election before 2014, lots of things can happen till then.
Missed this thread somehow.
Heh. I'd just advise to read the last few posts on Authueil's blog. Let's just say I agree that this breakup is a good thing for everyone including the right, far better than having five years of UMP under Copé's leadership.
The PS could benefit from a better opposition. Being in the light isn't their thing.
Copé and le Pen, heheh... lulz.
Funny that no one gave a shit about about this election before all this mess. Hungry for blood.
He wasn't. Leftists like to believe that leftists policies are actually centrist and try and tell the world that anything that isn't left wing is "extreme right".
952 votes?It went from 98 to 24 to 952?
Nothing fishy about that.
Is there anything about Hollande that isn't 'soft'?France's economic policies generally lean towards the left by international standards anyway. Even the FN loves our welfare state (well, at least for the whites & christian).
But on social issues, Hollande is generally seen as center-left, or "soft left". Which is softly for gay marriage, softly for human and immigrants rights etc. However, Sarkozy really reached for the extreme during the campaign on these, threatening to leave Schengen, focusing on family and christian values... even his closest advisor, Patrick Buisson, was a former journalist from a nationalist newspaper. Hell, this guy could even be the very reason why the UMP is breaking up now, between those who agree with his views (Copé) and those who think it's better to go back to the middle (Fillon).
Look, a gold nugget in a pool of manure!stop public funding for unions
His girlfriend's penisIs there anything about Hollande that isn't 'soft'?
Leftists are correct and the right has become extreme right (as known as neoliberalism) the last few decades. If you want to call Hollande a leftist then point me to his socialist policies, and I mean socialist as in the people controlling the means of production socialist.
Look, a gold nugget in a pool of manure!
Grâce à Copé tout va bien aller ; la COCOE va devenir responsable des statistiques économiques et le chômage aura disparu en 6 mois et le taux de croissance du PIB passera à 10 % Merci JF Copé !
No, not really. Our unions are crap but they're not Chicago ganster union crap.
French unions are a heck more combative than the complacent filth we have over here, but public funding of unions (unless secured in a completely transparent and fair way) is the best recipe for corruption. I'm really uncomfortable with such notion. I've seen way too many "fake" strikes called just to save face at the time when unions were reveling in public money while not moving a finger for their workers.
...add to the Constitution that France is a "Secular Republic of Christian Tradition"...
This is some pure FN bullshit, look at this shit.
Thou askth, thou get answers
Seriously that's the second most hot topic of the day...behind this drama.
And the leftist are correct? Like in the 80's?
Cause last time they pulled this crap we ended up with the very golden rule they were so much against.
No, not really. Our unions are crap but they're not Chicago ganster union crap.
edit : One of the comments in one of the article I linked cracked me up :
add to the Constitution that France is a "Secular Republic of Christian Tradition"
Nationalized natural resources isn't just a socialist concept, many sensible nations that don't want their national wealth being pillaged by multinational corporations have done that at some point and very few were socialist. Again, this isn't workers controlling the means of production, say that when they're nationalizing factories and redistributing farms on a massive scale. I don't think you realize what socialism is.
There is no identity crisis among Democrats in the US. We've been a straight center party since Bill Clinton and we're happy where we are. The Republicans are the ones with the identity crisis. They can't agree on what they stand for and they have no leader to rally behind.
If that ever happens, I'll just leave.
Just vote for the Socialist Party, there's no difference from the UMP apart from social issues.I've been across the ocean in NYC since early July, and despite occasional reading of Le Monde/Le Figaro I hadn't really followed this until I that even Chinese newspapers here were talking about it :lol
As someone who very reluctant voted for Sarkozy in May (after voting Bayrou two weeks earlier, :lol), I'm actually hoping for a split. I want Fillon to drop all the far right fear mongers so we can finally have a center-right party that is on the right side of history when it comes to social issues such as gay rights or immigration.
Just vote for the Socialist Party, there's no difference from the UMP apart from social issues.
:lolActually there is,
UMP doesn't have someone as stupid as Montebourg or Sapin...
But they have...
http://thegeekydream.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/i_see_what_you_did_there_super.jpg
Nah, that's science fiction. Anyway, there won't be an election before 2014, lots of things can happen till then.
stop public funding for unions
There is no identity crisis among Democrats in the US. We've been a straight center party since Bill Clinton and we're happy where we are. The Republicans are the ones with the identity crisis. They can't agree on what they stand for and they have no leader to rally behind.
Science fiction or not, the original Le Pen was able to be the second most voted presidential candidate with a much less radicalized ellectorate and better economic conditions...
Having several relatives inside of non goverment funded unions I say: hell yes. Public funding of unions is one of the worst ideas ever. EVER.
Just vote for the Socialist Party, there's no difference from the UMP apart from social issues.
If Valls and (who is with Valls anyways?) would split from Aubry/Montebourg, I'd vote for that center-left party easily.
lolwut
And the reason it happened wasn't because the turnout for LePen was higher but that the turnout for Jospin was an historical low. Lepen didn't do any better than the election before (was it European?).
That's not happening again considering how the political class is absolutely scare shitless of that ever happening again.
Here if your union is representative enough it gets funds, the rules are pretty clear.
But barely anyone ever get into the unions, they're deemed pointless and worthless.
I can tell that in my company they're worse than worthless.
Well it's a fact that France is country of predominantly Christian tradition, can't deny that.
But either it's a secular republic or it's not, there is no "of Christian tradition"bullshit since a secular republic is supposed to be neutral toward all religions. Wanting to include this in the constitution goes against the core principle of separation of church and state where the state should not recognize any religion as its own.
They like to claim they are attached to patriotism (what's the pride in this by the way) but it's like everything they propose is in direct opposition to the french moto Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite. They disgust me and I don't even consider myself Left leaning.
They should also consult some specialists to address their obsessional fear of Islam, it's getting ridiculous.
Thanks fucking God for that, seriously. I was playing the devil's advocate here, I just wanted to be sure that won't have a bigger case of Golden-Dawn-itis as the crisis unfolds.
Spanish unions are some of the worker's worst enemies, and this is not hyperbole. Always looking to help their political, subsidy - provider political party pimp rather than the worker's interests, always coward towards big business and downright abusive and exploitative with the smaller ones (they need to get "street creed" by thugging easy targets), God help you if the company you work at happens to be big, ruled by an ex - politico or *shudders* both things at the same time (I am looking at you, Iberia, Telefonica, Renfe, Endesa and a loooong etc).
What you're describing is not socialism though, at least not in the context of this thread.
What american call socialism is not what we, in France, call socialism that much is clear.
What you're describing is actually what we call here communism.
Best would be to look up the schism between the SFIO and the communist party at the turn of last century because they haven't changed much since then.
If you're claiming that your definition of socialism is the only one, well we're left in a true Scotmans fallacy were anyone but Poutou is not a socialist.