wait since when is wearing a mask a felony?
Open carrying pieces of shit try to scare people all the fucking time and they don't get any punishment whatsoever.Can't say I feel sorry for him, even if it is an extreme punishment. It looks like he's intentionally trying to scare people.
I'm OK with this. This dude seemed like he was gonna get up to some shit. The author of this article is bending backwards to give this guy the benefit of the doubt.
Should have been first postWhy so serious?
Yeah who cares about that whole innocent until proven guilty thing.. Especially when nothing actually happened.I'm OK with this. This dude seemed like he was gonna get up to some shit. The author of this article is bending backwards to give this guy the benefit of the doubt.
Yeah who cares about that whole innocent until proven guilty thing.. Especially when nothing actually happened.
Don't a significant amount of women wear full-face make up that significantly changes their true appearance?
That's not what he is being charged for. You can't arrest somebody for one charge simply as a pretext for something else that isn't illegal.Are they doing it to cause panic while armed?
The sword is fine but not that facepaint. ICP meet ups must be fun.
LOCK HER UP!!!
*Nods*
Though I think the punishment is a bit lax? Perhaps life in prison would be more appropriate for this act.
As far as the logic of this arrest goes, makeup like that is a mask that is a felony. She is clearly disguised from her true identity in that make up. Clearly, this is the act of a felon.That's the same
As far as the logic of this arrest goes, makeup like that is a mask that is a felony. She is clearly disguised from her true identity in that make up. Clearly, this is the act of a felon.
There is no way that anybody would identify the first picture and last picture as the same person if they had no prior knowledge of the person. She has fully covered her face in makeup. The makeup is literally designed to alter the features of her face. Many people use makeup to look completely different. This isn't news. Let's not pretend that some don't do this.Her makeup doesn't disguise her features they just subtly alter them and her original shot is still recognizably her and doesn't disguise her identity
I am not a lawyer but maybe it could be considered participating in a theatrical production, which is exempt.Does this mean that luchadores can't work in Virginia?
Lets just go ahead and co-opt all clothing and masks/makeup that some killers used to now be a signal of being a killer then.....Remember that time a couple dressed as Joke and Harley Quinn shot a cop in LA?
Or that guy in Belgium who murdered a bunch of kids dressed as the Joker?
The whole mask vs. Makeup thing is ridiculous, but I understand people feeling cautious around someone casually wearing full serial killer makeup on the street if there isn't a Con or particular reason.
The whole mask vs. Makeup thing is ridiculous, but I understand people feeling cautious around someone casually wearing full serial killer makeup on the street if there isn't a Con or particular reason.
Does this mean that luchadores can't work in Virginia?
The issue isn't people feeling cautious, it's someone getting arrested. This is obviously not okay.
According to VirginiaCode 18.2-422: It shall be unlawful for any person over 16 years of age, with the intent to conceal his identity, wear any mask, hood, or other device, whereby a substantial portion of the face is hidden or covered, so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, to be or appear in any public place, or upon any private property in this Commonwealth, without first having obtained from the owner or tenant thereof consent to do so in writing. However, the provisions of this section shall not apply to persons (i) wearing traditional holiday costumes; (ii) engaged in professions, trades, employment, or other activities, and wearing protective masks which are deemed necessary for the physical safety of the wearer or other persons; (iii) engaged in any bona fide theatrical production or masquerade ball; or (iv) wearing a mask, hood, or other device for bona fide medical reasons upon (a) the advice of a licensed physician or osteopath, and carrying on his person an affidavit from the physician or osteopath specifying the medical necessity for wearing the device, and the date on which the wearing of the device will no longer be necessary, and providing a brief description of the device, or (b) the declaration of a disaster or state of emergency by the Governor in response to a public health emergency, where the emergency declaration expressly waives this section, defines the mask appropriate for the emergency, and provides for the duration of the waiver. The violation of any provisions of this section is a Class 6 felony.
The law's origins were to curtail kkk activity. It's in the snippet in the op. While the kkk may not be bold enough to do it broad daylight anymore, modern day applications include curtailing furry activity. Seems fair enough to me.... what?
The law's origins were to curtail kkk activity. It's in the snippet in the op. While the kkk may not be bold enough to do it broad daylight anymore, modern day applications include curtailing furry activity. Seems fair enough to me.
Underappreciated post
If you have a reason to wear a mask, you're good. Cosplayers will be fine
It wasn't. And since it's not Halloween the holiday exception wouldn't apply. Still there's only mention of masks and devices. I'm sure a lawyer could argue makeup is neither.Recreation was not an enumerated reason in that.
Recreation was not an enumerated reason in that.
The question is whether it conceals his identity. Doesn't matter what device it is. Pantyhose would count too even thought they're partially see through.