Okay, then refer to people out here that cosplay that have never had an issue, between attending events, going to and fro, and eating at restaurants. This is not a charge the police hand out easily.
It's one thing to be walking around a shopping center by yourself, or wandering around some random neighborhood at night with a mask.
Hey this happened in my town! From what I understand he was in front of the Mission BBQ for a while, customers got uncomfortable and it was the business manager that called the cops. I think the arrest is an overreaction. The guy is probably going to lose his job now.
It's weird but this area seems to have some weird fascination with clowns. It's cooled off a little bit now, but last fall you would hear multiple reports per week of people in clown masks scaring people at night.
http://www.whsv.com/content/news/Front-Royal-man-arrested-for-wearing-clown-mask-394053381.html
So I think the arrest was more of a statement in regards to these instances rather than this guy actually breaking any laws.
So basically what you're saying is that it's okay to make vague laws that the police only both upholding when they want to detain someone for other reasons.
That isn't a good thing.
I don't understand why someone would defend this in general. In this specific situation it's even worse because you apparently want this guy locked up for open carrying a sword, which is legal, and looking weird. If you don't understand how that's problematic you really should reflect on what you think governments and justice systems should be doing.
Where did I attempt to defend the law? The article specifically mentions cosplayers. I know from experience this is not an issue for them and the activities they engage in. You're reading really far into my comments.
Edit: the law said this: (iii) engaged in any bona fide theatrical production or masquerade ball;
Lawyers can also argue that can mean comiccons
It's one thing to be walking around a shopping center by yourself, or wandering around some random neighborhood at night with a mask.
Halloween must be a bloodbath.... what?
This seems to me like you're trying to defend it?
And sure a lawyer could argue that. though honestly seems far more of a stretch than arguing that makeup like this doesn't fall under the parameters the law set out. That doesn't make this okay though.
After the theater shooting where the gunman was "dressed like the joker" can you really blame the officers for arresting another Joker walking around with a sword?
According to VirginiaCode 18.2-422: It shall be unlawful for any person over 16 years of age, with the intent to conceal his identity, wear any mask, hood, or other device, whereby a substantial portion of the face is hidden or covered, so as to conceal the identity of the wearer, to be or appear in any public place, or upon any private property in this Commonwealth, without first having obtained from the owner or tenant thereof consent to do so in writing. However, the provisions of this section shall not apply to persons (i) wearing traditional holiday costumes; (ii) engaged in professions, trades, employment, or other activities, and wearing protective masks which are deemed necessary for the physical safety of the wearer or other persons; (iii) engaged in any bona fide theatrical production or masquerade ball; or (iv) wearing a mask, hood, or other device for bona fide medical reasons upon (a) the advice of a licensed physician or osteopath, and carrying on his person an affidavit from the physician or osteopath specifying the medical necessity for wearing the device, and the date on which the wearing of the device will no longer be necessary, and providing a brief description of the device, or (b) the declaration of a disaster or state of emergency by the Governor in response to a public health emergency, where the emergency declaration expressly waives this section, defines the mask appropriate for the emergency, and provides for the duration of the waiver. The violation of any provisions of this section is a Class 6 felony.
Based on my experience as a reporter covering crime, cops will get you on what they can get you on. They can't literally charge this guy for being creepy, so they charge him with something they can.
He's guilty of wearing a mask per the ordinance.
Still a better Joker than Suicide Squad.
Can't say I feel sorry for him, even if it is an extreme punishment. It looks like he's intentionally trying to scare people.
I'm OK with this. This dude seemed like he was gonna get up to some shit. The author of this article is bending backwards to give this guy the benefit of the doubt.
Except...they didn't? A mask would mean you can't see his face whatsoever. He has facepaint on, and you can still see his face.
I love the combination of "felony to wear a mask" and "legal to open carry a sword"